Thorny Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 Juolevi is not worth Reinhart though, regardless of if they asked for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 There's a period there, as in either or ;) If you are trading Reinhart to Vancouver you get Juolevi and Boeser and something else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 Juolevi is not worth Reinhart though, regardless of if they asked for that.Agreed, but they will, and the deal will die Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 Agreed, but they will, and the deal will die If Vancouver was smart they wouldn't trade Boeser or Juolevi. If I can trade for either I do everything I can to get one of them. Boeser I love and Juolevi is a good young defender so there ya go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 Agreed, but they will, and the deal will die Indubitably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 Also I don't think GMTM is going to trade Jack Eichel's roommate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 (edited) I'm not saying what Reinhart is worth, or that he's moving. But invariably every deal we talk about in here, the starting point for the other team is going to be him Edited November 8, 2016 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 I'm not saying what Reinhart is worth, or that he's moving. But invariably every deal we talk about in here, the starting point for the other team is going to be him Perhaps. I think Zemgus has value to certain teams. Not Brock Boeser value but value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 Perhaps. I think Zemgus has value to certain teams. Not Brock Boeser value but value.I'm impressed by how calm you're being, aren't you a mega Boeser fan? If a prospect I drooled over was possibly available I'd be flipping out haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 I'm not saying what Reinhart is worth, or that he's moving. But invariably every deal we talk about in here, the starting point for the other team is going to be him The feeling I get lately is that Reinhart is the desired starting point around here, as well. Guy's name has been in trade proposal talk here since GMTM walked off the stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 I'm impressed by how calm you're being, aren't you a mega Boeser fan? If a prospect I drooled over was possibly available I'd be flipping out haha I hated Lehner because it meant we lost Boeser so yes I am a huge fan. That said I don't think it is possible to get him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted November 8, 2016 Report Share Posted November 8, 2016 (edited) More on the Kane to Minny Rumor from Michael Russo BrodieManMN:[/size] Do you have more detail on what Wild GM Chuck Fletcher and Sabres GM Tim Murray had cooking with Evander Kane?[/size] Russo: I can only say that I’ve been told by multiple sources multiple times that there were trade talks. But you can assume that in order to add $5.25 million in salary (even if salary/cap space were retained), it would have had to be a “hockey trade.” Kane for Pommers straight up! The man is completely at sea.makes sense that he is in Vancouver, after being in Boston Edited November 8, 2016 by apuszczalowski Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted November 14, 2016 Report Share Posted November 14, 2016 Any interest in TVR from Chicago, I doubt he'd be expensive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted November 14, 2016 Report Share Posted November 14, 2016 Any interest in TVR from Chicago, I doubt he'd be expensive. It's a shame TVR isn't Russian, otherwise we could call him the Russian Supercar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 Canucks looking at Evander Kane per McKenzie. They looked this summer as well. Virtanen a possible return, but Mc Kenzie mentioned the Sabres looking for D help http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/insider-trading-canucks-still-keeping-tabs-on-evander-kane-s-availability~995461 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 (edited) Juolevi... Can anyone give a quick rundown on Virtanen? Edited November 15, 2016 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 ... Jake Virtanen... did he say Virtanen? Juolevi...Can anyone give a quick rundown on Virtanen? yes. Fast, good release, powerful, stands up for teammates. Needs to work on his defensive zone stuff. He is still raw though. Don't expect him to show up and score 30goals or anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 (edited) Sweet, thanks Liger. What does he project as? Saw his stats, 55 gp in the NHL with 7-6-13 Just read his bio. He sounds exactly like Evander Kane. Probably not as dumb, but the same skill set Edited November 15, 2016 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 Canucks looking at Evander Kane per McKenzie. They looked this summer as well. Virtanen a possible return, but Mc Kenzie mentioned the Sabres looking for D help http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/insider-trading-canucks-still-keeping-tabs-on-evander-kane-s-availability~995461 Don't get your hopes up don't get your hopes up don't get your hopes up. Welp, didn't work, my hopes are up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 Don't get your hopes up don't get your hopes up don't get your hopes up. Welp, didn't work, my hopes are up. It's been so long, I'm clinging to anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 Sweet, thanks Liger. What does he project as? Saw his stats, 55 gp in the NHL with 7-13-20 Well remember that he was a 19yr old on a roster that really lacks a true center which he needs to be successful. A general thought would be his ceiling is around 30g and 35a. could be a little more depending on NHL game changes and his development. His floor is probably around 10g and 12a. He could end up as just a good 3rd line player. Hard to say as I didn't watch more than a few highlights of Vancouver games from last year. I love him but if I am trading them Kane they would need to add things. Jake on Jack's wing... that would be intriguing. We really don't need a RW though. He should have had about 15.2 points in his first NHL season and he had 13 in 55games so looking at the numbers he translated almost exactly as you would have predicted. That's not a bad sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 Just imagine Kane and a 2nd and 3rd for Tanev and Virtanen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted November 15, 2016 Report Share Posted November 15, 2016 Just imagine Kane and a 2nd and 3rd for Tanev and VirtanenAll I'm imagining is Juolevi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted November 16, 2016 Report Share Posted November 16, 2016 Well remember that he was a 19yr old on a roster that really lacks a true center which he needs to be successful. A general thought would be his ceiling is around 30g and 35a. could be a little more depending on NHL game changes and his development. His floor is probably around 10g and 12a. He could end up as just a good 3rd line player. Hard to say as I didn't watch more than a few highlights of Vancouver games from last year. I love him but if I am trading them Kane they would need to add things. Jake on Jack's wing... that would be intriguing. We really don't need a RW though. He should have had about 15.2 points in his first NHL season and he had 13 in 55games so looking at the numbers he translated almost exactly as you would have predicted. That's not a bad sign. True, but it would free up Reinhart to be center full time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabres Fan in NS Posted November 16, 2016 Report Share Posted November 16, 2016 All I'm imagining is Juolevi Eugene Levy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.