Jump to content

Derrico

Members
  • Posts

    8,889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Derrico

  1. Then Jack remains a Buffalo Sabre. He doesn't want to play? Too bad he has 5 more seasons left on his contract. He can bitch and moan all he wants. The Sabres have all of the leverage here. The only way they trade him under these conditions is if they truly see a high probability he will never recover from this injury.
  2. The reality may also mean don’t believe everything you read in the media. Teams have an incentive to say one thing publicly and then do another. This is Jack freaking Eichel. I know there is the injury issue but there’s also a decent chance in 6 months he’s back to being a top 10 nhl player. It would be absurd to trade him for that Columbus package. We CANNOT have another ROR trade. That will set this franchise back years…
  3. I’m done bowing to players. If Sam wants to be here great. I’m not making him the priority of a Jack Eichel trade. If I’m trading the whale I’m getting the best return possible. Be that futures or present players IMO.
  4. Then I'm walking away. He's a replacement level goalie that is injury prone at this point in his career.
  5. I'm normally this guy. But the Sabres have given me so little faith in their competence that I can no longer give them the benefit of the doubt.
  6. If the Kings were interested in Jack, do we really think we're going to hear the Mayor of the LA Kings come out and announce it? You guys put way too much into tweets.
  7. Ok if Beniers has a Cirelli floor then that may be the guy I want. That’s not what I’ve read though. All I want is the sabres to take the guy who will end up the better player in a couple years regardless of position. If it’s Beniers then that’s great but I’m not passing on Power simply because I have a Bryson or Samuelson. Those guys are far from locks and I’m done relying on a bunch of unknown non top 5 draft picks.
  8. Jfc I must be getting old. Never heard that term in my life. Thanks for the explanation. I thought it was an autocorrect or something misspelled lol.
  9. You hated the Samuelsson pick....
  10. If that is the description that is who I want. We haven’t had that since....
  11. I know this is a Power thread so I will check out the Beniers thread next. Saying that, you will never convince many who want Power that we should go Beniers because we have drafted D in the recent past and can’t score. But I would love to hear the attributes of each player and why you feel Beniers should be the pick. I’m very open to a 2-way centre but all I keep hearing as don’t pick Power because we have Dahlin. That’s not a very worthwhile conversation IMO.
  12. What do you mean drivers of play? I would argue the D making the initial outlet pass out of the zone would actually be more of a ‘driver of play.’
  13. No we didn’t. We didn’t take the right guys.
  14. If Beniers reminds you of Patrice Bergeron I want to have that conversation. Please elaborate. Nobody who wants Power will even entertain your first point. Our D has been God awful for years now. We have a couple maybes who were late first or non first round picks in our system. They’ve played a handful of games on a terrible team playing meaningless games. Sorry if I’m not going to assume these kids are going to be NHL players. Let’s not over estimate their abilities and assume that we are all set at that position. Isn’t that exactly what we’ve been doing over and over again (along with horrendous drafting).
  15. You don’t know KA personally lol. Having said that, I would enjoy your posts and with you on Power.
  16. To be fair 31 and 32 OA are far from nhl prospects let alone ones we should be relying on. They are nothing more then magic beans at this point.
  17. I’m kind of like this too. But whatever happens I would still much rather have one then three.
  18. Same. But this year I'm giving zero expectations of who I want or care what the boards immediate reaction is. I just hope they don't ***** up the pick.
  19. I would definitely be interested in a D. I really don't think our D is so good and have so many defensive prospects coming that you would exclude them due to position. IMO Colorado has an unbelievable top line but it's their top 4 that drive their offense IMO. I wouldn't mind copying that model.
  20. Nope. I think we're all sick of it and odds are we're going to lose anyways.....
  21. To be fair I also agree that not doing anything in the off-season with goaltending was his worst blunder and I’ve shouted that from the rooftops. What was concerning with this decision was that Eakin vs Larry looked like a bad decision from an analytics perspective from the very moment he signed and that’s exactly how it played out. So it begs the question: is Nightengale terrible at his job as head of analytics or does KA not give a ***** about analytics altogether. Both situations are very concerning in their own right.
  22. Jack freaking Eichel was hurt basically the entire season no?
×
×
  • Create New...