Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Buffalo is reportedly worth 1.36 billion. That's 29th in the league. They also managed to generate 174-183 million in revenue last yr which is shocking considering how awful they've become and how run down the arena is. 

"next six lowest revenue-generating clubs — Buffalo, Utah, Ottawa, San Jose, Anaheim and Winnipeg — still made between $174 million and $183 million last season."

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6680260/2025/10/01/nhl-franchise-valuations-team-worth-sportico/

Posted
1 hour ago, LGR4GM said:

Buffalo is reportedly worth 1.36 billion. That's 29th in the league. They also managed to generate 174-183 million in revenue last yr which is shocking considering how awful they've become and how run down the arena is. 

"next six lowest revenue-generating clubs — Buffalo, Utah, Ottawa, San Jose, Anaheim and Winnipeg — still made between $174 million and $183 million last season."

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6680260/2025/10/01/nhl-franchise-valuations-team-worth-sportico/

It’s only shocking if people have believed the long held myth that these franchises lose money. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, tom webster said:

It’s only shocking if people have believed the long held myth that these franchises lose money. 

There is a difference between franchise values and operating in the red. Does $180MM/yr pay the bills? I don't know all the Sabres expenses.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Without Winnipeg, that's a whole lot of playoff drought on that lowest revenue list (I know, Ottawa).  That whole thing feels like a big chicken or the egg thing on what is coming first.  I'll hold off on Utah for now because who the hell knows what they have there yet.

Posted
29 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

The is a difference between franchise values and operating in the red. Does $180MM/yr pay the bills? I don't know all the Sabres expenses.

Does 180 million pay all the bills for a team that only spends half that on the cap? I'd hope so. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Does 180 million pay all the bills for a team that only spends half that on the cap? I'd hope so. 

Are the Sabres in the red or black when the revenues/costs are tabulated?

Just my opinion, but if the owner had a competitive team that made the playoffs, the generated revenue would be around 50% more. Save a penny and lose a dollar.

Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, tom webster said:

It’s only shocking if people have believed the long held myth that these franchises lose money. 

Making small amounts of money by pinching every penny possible like many NHL teams do versus making crap loads of money while spending money like it's free as they do in the NFL are completely different things.

Also "revenue" is not profit.

Edited by Big Guava
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Does 180 million pay all the bills for a team that only spends half that on the cap? I'd hope so. 

I don't know. What other expenses are there? Teams have more employees than just players. What about rent, taxes, insurance? Are you aware that a salary is only about 60% of the cost of an employee?

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

I don't know. What other expenses are there? Teams have more employees than just players.

Yea I'm sure Jan in accounting is really making it hard for Terry to afford her 60k a year. 

Also as noted up thread, Terry is saving a penny to cost himself a dollar. This team would make far more money if they made the playoffs. 

Edited by LGR4GM

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...