JohnC Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 12 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I’m going to call BS on that stat. There is no way that 14.7% 5 on 5 is an NHL record. I also disagree that a regression is going to happen. The kid has improved all 3 NHL seasons. He may top out as a 75 pt guy, but how many forwards of even that level have we drafted and developed since the tank? 2, Eichel and Reinhart who were both 2nd overall picks. We didn’t draft Thompson. You made the succinct potent point as to why he shouldn't be dealt. None of us really know what the player wants to do. Is he maneuvering for a gilded long-term contract or is he another disillusioned Sabre player who wants to get the freak out of this toxic waste franchise. Who can criticize someone for desiring a better chance for individual and team success. This is what happens when a franchise becomes known for its generational failure and understandably is not a destination for players not only outside the system but also within it. The organization needs to do everything within reason to keep him. 1 Quote
dudacek Posted 7 hours ago Author Report Posted 7 hours ago Seravalli's latest: Scoop: There may be no better player available, period, on the trade market this summer – let alone one of Peterka’s age at 23, already a top-line producer. Embattled Sabres GM Kevyn Adams previously said he has no interest in trading Peterka, but he’s apparently come around on the inevitability. He declined to say Tuesday whether Peterka requested a trade. More than a handful of teams have expressed legitimate interest: both the Rangers and Islanders, Lightning, Mammoth, Blackhawks and Canucks, and they’re not alone. Buffalo is determined to get an impact roster player back for the present as opposed to futures. Quote
Mr Peabody Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago If JJ gets offer sheeted we’ll end up with ~ $30M of our cap between JJ, Muel, Power, and Norris. In about 3 years that may be a deal but it’s a stretch for next season. Quote
dudacek Posted 4 hours ago Author Report Posted 4 hours ago What do we think of JJ for Jordan Kyrou? A new name that’s out there, seems kinda sideways for me, but he is a youngish veteran with term. Kinda looks like the Cozens/Norris move. Quote
The Jokeman Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Mr Peabody said: If JJ gets offer sheeted we’ll end up with ~ $30M of our cap between JJ, Muel, Power, and Norris. In about 3 years that may be a deal but it’s a stretch for next season. Then trade Muel to a team with cap room to spare for a bag of pucks. Quote
The Jokeman Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, dudacek said: What do we think of JJ for Jordan Kyrou? A new name that’s out there, seems kinda sideways for me, but he is a youngish veteran with term. Kinda looks like the Cozens/Norris move. Jordan's 4 years older than JJP but I mean it isn't a horrible move toss in does give us another right handed shot. Only issue since it's a 1 for 1 are we doing anything to improve the team? Not really so we'd still need another top 6 player IMO and a top 4 RHD and Goalie to pair with UPL or Levi and $8million less of cap room. Quote
Drag0nDan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Jokeman said: Jordan's 4 years older than JJP but I mean it isn't a horrible move toss in does give us another right handed shot. Only issue since it's a 1 for 1 are we doing anything to improve the team? Not really so we'd still need another top 6 player IMO and a top 4 RHD and Goalie to pair with UPL or Levi and $8million less of cap room. He is better than Peterka right now though as a full hockey player from end to end. Assuming they want Peterka in the trade (I think they could make a case for Byram)... You probably want tage back at center and it'd look something like: Benson - Tage - Tuch Zucker - Norris - Kyrou Kulich - Mcleod - Quinn Greenway - Krebs - Malenstyn Quote
JustOutsideChicago Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: Oh good. Terry gave his blessing.. Quote
jahnyc Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago It will be incredibly depressing if the Sabres trade Peterka. Why would a team that has failed to make the playoffs for 14 years be trading a player that is considered to be the top asset (only 23 years old) available this offseason? Sabres can't continue to be the development team for quality players that will be traded for much less value to teams with quality front offices and organizations. Quote
The Jokeman Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 31 minutes ago, Drag0nDan said: He is better than Peterka right now though as a full hockey player from end to end. Assuming they want Peterka in the trade (I think they could make a case for Byram)... You probably want tage back at center and it'd look something like: Benson - Tage - Tuch Zucker - Norris - Kyrou Kulich - Mcleod - Quinn Greenway - Krebs - Malenstyn I'm not quiet in my disliking Benson on the top 2 lines. Quote
kas23 Posted 58 minutes ago Report Posted 58 minutes ago 39 minutes ago, jahnyc said: It will be incredibly depressing if the Sabres trade Peterka. Why would a team that has failed to make the playoffs for 14 years be trading a player that is considered to be the top asset (only 23 years old) available this offseason? Sabres can't continue to be the development team for quality players that will be traded for much less value to teams with quality front offices and organizations. I guess “we’re gonna build through the draft” isn’t quite working. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 52 minutes ago Report Posted 52 minutes ago 37 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: I'm not quiet in my disliking Benson on the top 2 lines. Benson is going to blow your doors off. Quote
ponokasabre Posted 41 minutes ago Report Posted 41 minutes ago 10 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Benson is going to blow your doors off. Ya I really feel this year is the year we see the full Benson experience and we are all gonna love it Quote
sabremike Posted 34 minutes ago Report Posted 34 minutes ago 54 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: I'm not quiet in my disliking Benson on the top 2 lines. You probably should be because it's a really bad take. Quote
inkman Posted 13 minutes ago Report Posted 13 minutes ago 38 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Benson is going to blow your doors off. And he’s good at hockey 1 hour ago, The Jokeman said: I'm not quiet in my disliking Benson on the top 2 lines. At face value this take doesn’t suck but his underlying metrics are special. He’s got it. Whatever it is. He has it in droves and he’s a dick on the ice. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 5 minutes ago Report Posted 5 minutes ago Maybe Ruff won't stupidly bench for a penalty while everyone else Sunday skates around. Or maybe Benson will finally get pp time. Quote
ponokasabre Posted just now Report Posted just now Elliotte Friedman: I think the chances are pretty good that Sabres Bowen Byram gets dealt, with JJ Peterka I still don't think Buffalo's heart is really in it - SN 590 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.