JohnC Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 12 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I’m going to call BS on that stat. There is no way that 14.7% 5 on 5 is an NHL record. I also disagree that a regression is going to happen. The kid has improved all 3 NHL seasons. He may top out as a 75 pt guy, but how many forwards of even that level have we drafted and developed since the tank? 2, Eichel and Reinhart who were both 2nd overall picks. We didn’t draft Thompson. You made the succinct potent point as to why he shouldn't be dealt. None of us really know what the player wants to do. Is he maneuvering for a gilded long-term contract or is he another disillusioned Sabre player who wants to get the freak out of this toxic waste franchise. Who can criticize someone for desiring a better chance for individual and team success. This is what happens when a franchise becomes known for its generational failure and understandably is not a destination for players not only outside the system but also within it. The organization needs to do everything within reason to keep him. 1 Quote
dudacek Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago Seravalli's latest: Scoop: There may be no better player available, period, on the trade market this summer – let alone one of Peterka’s age at 23, already a top-line producer. Embattled Sabres GM Kevyn Adams previously said he has no interest in trading Peterka, but he’s apparently come around on the inevitability. He declined to say Tuesday whether Peterka requested a trade. More than a handful of teams have expressed legitimate interest: both the Rangers and Islanders, Lightning, Mammoth, Blackhawks and Canucks, and they’re not alone. Buffalo is determined to get an impact roster player back for the present as opposed to futures. Quote
Mr Peabody Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago If JJ gets offer sheeted we’ll end up with ~ $30M of our cap between JJ, Muel, Power, and Norris. In about 3 years that may be a deal but it’s a stretch for next season. Quote
dudacek Posted 2 hours ago Author Report Posted 2 hours ago What do we think of JJ for Jordan Kyrou? A new name that’s out there, seems kinda sideways for me, but he is a youngish veteran with term. Kinda looks like the Cozens/Norris move. Quote
The Jokeman Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Mr Peabody said: If JJ gets offer sheeted we’ll end up with ~ $30M of our cap between JJ, Muel, Power, and Norris. In about 3 years that may be a deal but it’s a stretch for next season. Then trade Muel to a team with cap room to spare for a bag of pucks. Quote
The Jokeman Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, dudacek said: What do we think of JJ for Jordan Kyrou? A new name that’s out there, seems kinda sideways for me, but he is a youngish veteran with term. Kinda looks like the Cozens/Norris move. Jordan's 4 years older than JJP but I mean it isn't a horrible move toss in does give us another right handed shot. Only issue since it's a 1 for 1 are we doing anything to improve the team? Not really so we'd still need another top 6 player IMO and a top 4 RHD and Goalie to pair with UPL or Levi and $8million less of cap room. Quote
Drag0nDan Posted 29 minutes ago Report Posted 29 minutes ago 1 hour ago, The Jokeman said: Jordan's 4 years older than JJP but I mean it isn't a horrible move toss in does give us another right handed shot. Only issue since it's a 1 for 1 are we doing anything to improve the team? Not really so we'd still need another top 6 player IMO and a top 4 RHD and Goalie to pair with UPL or Levi and $8million less of cap room. He is better than Peterka right now though as a full hockey player from end to end. Assuming they want Peterka in the trade (I think they could make a case for Byram)... You probably want tage back at center and it'd look something like: Benson - Tage - Tuch Zucker - Norris - Kyrou Kulich - Mcleod - Quinn Greenway - Krebs - Malenstyn Quote
JustOutsideChicago Posted 15 minutes ago Report Posted 15 minutes ago 17 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: Oh good. Terry gave his blessing.. Quote
jahnyc Posted 5 minutes ago Report Posted 5 minutes ago It will be incredibly depressing if the Sabres trade Peterka. Why would a team that has failed to make the playoffs for 14 years be trading a player that is considered to be the top asset (only 23 years old) available this offseason? Sabres can't continue to be the development team for quality players that will be traded for much less value to teams with quality front offices and organizations. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.