Jump to content

Buffalo's Forward Group, as a whole, A Poll   

38 members have voted

  1. 1. How Do You Feel About Sabre’s Forward Group as Currently Comprised?

    • I love them, not only do they score lots of goals but they have toughness, block shots and most importantly have room to still really grow
      0
    • They are really good, very good actually, but I question their commitment to team defense but I hope that will change
      4
    • Talented group yes, but they rely on youth too much and lack mental toughness
      10
    • Bunch of individualists with no commitment to team defense. Only play hard when they feel like it
      7
    • They are just not the material you build a winning hockey program around. Their talent is overrated and commitment to winning is a joke
      4
    • I hate to be that guy, but it depends. If Norris stays healthy then I think this group can be great, but if he is hurt all the time that will leave a big hole
      5
    • They need to add another big time player
      4
    • *Consult your physician before engaging with this poll, side effects include bleeding under the finger nails and out your eye balls, periods of intense homicidal rage, followed by equally intense episodes of euphoric rapture, swelling of testicles , loss of vision and a slow horribly painful death
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted

I’ve said it a bunch of times.  Every player in this lineup is capable of being a good, contributing player on a good playoff team.  But the roster sucks as built.  I can speculate as to what I think it might be, but honestly, I am not sure.  I just know that there is something significantly not right with this collection of good enough to be better than what they are players.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
38 minutes ago, Weave said:

I’ve said it a bunch of times.  Every player in this lineup is capable of being a good, contributing player on a good playoff team.  But the roster sucks as built.  I can speculate as to what I think it might be, but honestly, I am not sure.  I just know that there is something significantly not right with this collection of good enough to be better than what they are players.

Too young? 

Posted (edited)

Some good players at forward.  Very still young overall.  A lot of similar style players and most of them lack a two-way game.   They need another top 6 veteran, not sold on Norris due to health reasons but a good and healthy season from him would be a pleasant surprise.   

They need better play from the bottom 6 in the line up.   Some true shut down players.   Last off-seasons  4th line remake was not a success.  Get a guy that will punch the lights out of people and can play 4th line minutes. 

Edited by Pimlach
Posted

I think they are a bit overrated. Our top line is a descent scoring second. We lack a versatile top line that can adequately score and play two way hockey. 

From my perspective, minutes deserved, we have a second line, 2 third lines and a mediocre fourth line. 

This team is far from being competitive. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Posted

The key is as a whole to me... as a whole they are lazy uninspired weak cowardly underachieving self centered losers that are better suited to the ice capades. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pimlach said:

Some good players at forward.  Very still young overall.  A lot of similar style players and most of them lack a two-way game.   They need another top 6 veteran, not sold on Norris due to health reasons but a good and healthy season from him would be a pleasant surprise.   

They need better play from the bottom 6 in the line up.   Some true shut down players.   Last off-seasons the 4th line remake was not a success.  Get a guy that will punch the lights out of people and can play 4th line minutes. 

Benson, Kulick, Quinn and JJP all babies still. Best years ahead of them, but growing pains still ahead. 

Watching Florida and Carolina play you see how their forwards are defense first and then make the big plays in key moments. Have to work towards that. Hopefully they take a step forward next year to at least end the draught 

Posted
1 hour ago, oddoublee said:

I think they are a bit overrated. Our top line is a descent scoring second. We lack a versatile top line that can adequately score and play two way hockey. 

 

Thompson Tuch Peterka sports a GF% of 57.9

Thompson Kulich Benson is 55.6%

Their most effective combo was Thompson, Kulich Peterka with 65.4%

 

Best group in the league (minimum 200 minutes) was Fiala Byfield and Laferriere at 76.9%

Some big name lines:

  • Hyman Draisaitl McDavid 72.7%
  • Knies Matthews Marner 61%
  • Verhaege Barkov Reinhart 58.3%
  • Lehkonen McKinnon Rantanen 55.6%
  • Tkachuk Bennett Verhaege 44.4%
  • Thanks (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Thorny said:

If anything we completely ripped Florida off when we bagged Kulich.

Kulich and Levi could eventually become a good haul for Reinhart but right now this trade is in Florida’s. favor.   
 

Reinhart’s SC winning game 7 goal is going to be hard to beat.   Plus he is a steady two way 50 goal scorer.  
 

Im doubting they will ever regret the trade. 

Edited by Pimlach
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

Im doubting they will regret the trade. 

Florida will never regret the trade. They got their first Cup.

The forwards are too young still. But Adams is the GM EEEternal, so just wait 3 more years and everything will work out. That’s the plan and we’re simply along for the ride. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
20 hours ago, bob_sauve28 said:

Benson, Kulick, Quinn and JJP all babies still. Best years ahead of them, but growing pains still ahead. 

Watching Florida and Carolina play you see how their forwards are defense first and then make the big plays in key moments. Have to work towards that. Hopefully they take a step forward next year to at least end the draught 

Would only keep Benson and Kulich of those four. Quinn is soft and skates in quicksand. JJP can't or won't play defense. 

Posted
21 hours ago, bob_sauve28 said:

Benson, Kulick, Quinn and JJP all babies still. Best years ahead of them, but growing pains still ahead. 

Watching Florida and Carolina play you see how their forwards are defense first and then make the big plays in key moments. Have to work towards that. Hopefully they take a step forward next year to at least end the draught 

Their forwards have a lot of nasty in them as well... we have almost no nasty except for the smallest guy on the team... 

Posted

Over the past six seasons the leagues youngest team has ranked 30th (OTT), 28th (NJD), 31st (DET), 32nd (CBJ), 32nd (ANA) and 29th (BUF) in goals against.    

So blame KA for icing the youngest team in the league and expecting playoffs. 

The players themselves will be fine, they have enough talent... they just haven't learned how to defend at the NHL level yet.

It takes physical growth, coaching, experience and patience.  

You want the instant gratification of making the playoffs?   Then you'll need to swap out some youngsters for some veterans.   

But is that really the goal?   Are you willing to sacrifice future returns just to squeak into a wildcard spot and get walloped in the 1st round?

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, pi2000 said:

Over the past six seasons the leagues youngest team has ranked 30th (OTT), 28th (NJD), 31st (DET), 32nd (CBJ), 32nd (ANA) and 29th (BUF) in goals against.    

So blame KA for icing the youngest team in the league and expecting playoffs. 

The players themselves will be fine, they have enough talent... they just haven't learned how to defend at the NHL level yet.

It takes physical growth, coaching, experience and patience.  

You want the instant gratification of making the playoffs?   Then you'll need to swap out some youngsters for some veterans.   

But is that really the goal?   Are you willing to sacrifice future returns just to squeak into a wildcard spot and get walloped in the 1st round?

Lmfao. Yea... 14yrs of no playoffs is us sacrificing the future and wanting instant gratification. 

5yrs of Adams selling a future that's never coming because he's too stupid to fix the gt.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Lmfao. Yea... 14yrs of no playoffs is us sacrificing the future and wanting instant gratification. 

5yrs of Adams selling a future that's never coming because he's too stupid to fix the gt.

Will they be more successful over the next decade if they....

A - continue to develop their young talent and let them grow into complete players

or

B - trade away young talent for veterans who can get them into a wildcard spot in 2025-26

  • dislike 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Lmfao. Yea... 14yrs of no playoffs is us sacrificing the future and wanting instant gratification. 

5yrs of Adams selling a future that's never coming because he's too stupid to fix the gt.

When was that? Did I miss something?

13 minutes ago, pi2000 said:

Will they be more successful over the next decade if they....

A - continue to develop their young talent and let them grow into complete players

or

B - trade away young talent for veterans who can get them into a wildcard spot in 2025-26

B

Posted
35 minutes ago, pi2000 said:

Will they be more successful over the next decade if they....

A - continue to develop their young talent and let them grow into complete players

or

B - trade away young talent for veterans who can get them into a wildcard spot in 2025-26

Your options here are *****. Designed to force an answer that gives you a win. 

They will be more successful if the identify which young talent to keep and which to trade. You're so wrong on all this and we have years is proof. What, if we trade Östlund and Samuelsson for a 29yr defender we're gonna lose in round 1 and won't be good for a decade? What a fake set of choices.

We traded Savoie for McLeod, guess we're losing in round 1 instead of being good for a decade. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

The Sabres have lots of young* players, they should trade some lottery tickets for sure things. Not all of them but some. 

Edited by LGR4GM
  • Agree 2
Posted

I’m fine with the forward group as is.  It’s not perfect, a few small changes might help, but I like the core of Benson, Tuch, TNT, Kulich, McLeod, Zucker, & JJP. With a healthy Norris so much better.  This is not the area that kept this team from winning. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...