NHL Lottery May 5th

[Weave]

This stupid event has more pages of conversation than a mid season Sabres game.

Even Promo the Bot is more active than for actual games.

 

Edited 14 hours ago by Weave

[GASabresIUFAN]

5 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

Islanders is rigged? If it was rigged it would have been Boston or Pittsburgh. 

Rigged against Buffalo 

[inkman]

10 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Rigged against Buffalo 

The league doesn’t need to bother.  The Sabres are perfectly capable of ineptitude without the assistance.  

[GoPuckYourself]

12 hours ago, sabremike said:

The theory is the league did it as a make good for hosing them out of the ASG (which the team used access to as a renewal incentive BTW).

(Yes I know it's total nonsense).

Gotta love those conspiracies.

[dudacek]

Athletic's instant mock has the Sabres taking Brady Martin over McQueen, which I think would delight most of us.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6335303/2025/05/05/nhl-mock-draft-2025-schaefer-islanders/

Frondell, O'Brien, Mtrka were 6-7-8.

Thoughts?

[Taro T]

10 hours ago, shrader said:

Did Utah jump a full 10 spots by winning the second drawing or did they jump 9? It feels strange that the prize for them would be identical whether they win the first or the second drawing. 
 

And actually, this has me wondering about a different scenario. What if it had been reversed, Utah wins the first drawing and the Islanders the second. Does NYI wind up with 1 overall in that scenario?

Aisles would've gotten the 2nd pick in that scenario.  The Snarks would get pick 1.  The Fighting Mormons get 4 and whoever started out at 2 gets 3.

[LGR4GM]

4 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Athletic's instant mock has the Sabres taking Brady Martin over McQueen, which I think would delight most of us.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6335303/2025/05/05/nhl-mock-draft-2025-schaefer-islanders/

Frondell, O'Brien, Mtrka were 6-7-8.

Thoughts?

It's possible. Like 6ish-14ish is roughly interchangeable. Not in reality when it's all send and done but here and now. 

[shrader]

1 hour ago, Taro T said:

Aisles would've gotten the 2nd pick in that scenario.  The Snarks would get pick 1.  The Fighting Mormons get 4 and whoever started out at 2 gets 3.

I guess it doesn’t matter too much, but I feel like Utah should have moved up one less spot since they didn’t win the first draw. I guess they can’t set it up that way because it could lead to a scenario where both winners are supposed to move up to the same spot (15 wins and moves up to 5, 14 then wins and would also go up to 5th). 

[PotentPowerPlay21]

Any system that allows a team to jump up 9 or 10 places is just plain dumb and unfair. Period.

[Taro T]

3 hours ago, shrader said:

I guess it doesn’t matter too much, but I feel like Utah should have moved up one less spot since they didn’t win the first draw. I guess they can’t set it up that way because it could lead to a scenario where both winners are supposed to move up to the same spot (15 wins and moves up to 5, 14 then wins and would also go up to 5th). 

Because the NHL doesn't already make things convoluted enough; let's add 1 MORE level of complexity to something that should be really friggin' simple but the NHL CAN'T let things be simple.  Not when there's a possiblilty of making them completely unfollowable.  They aren't there YET (and even with your proposed modification they wouldn't be there, but they'd be heading in that direction) but give 'em time and more ideas like this and they'll get there.  

(Not meant for the snark to be directed at you; just the NHL and the stupid Sabres deserve the ire today.)

[shrader]

21 minutes ago, Taro T said:

Because the NHL doesn't already make things convoluted enough; let's add 1 MORE level of complexity to something that should be really friggin' simple but the NHL CAN'T let things be simple.  Not when there's a possiblilty of making them completely unfollowable.  They aren't there YET (and even with your proposed modification they wouldn't be there, but they'd be heading in that direction) but give 'em time and more ideas like this and they'll get there.  

(Not meant for the snark to be directed at you; just the NHL and the stupid Sabres deserve the ire today.)

So you’re saying that you don’t like a system that is anti-tank but still leaves in a bit of pro-tank protection by only allowing the bottom 10 teams to have a shot at the first pick?

It’s a cowardly setup. If you feel the need to create a weighted lottery (which I hate, by the way), have all of the teams involved playing for the same prize. 

[steveoath]

I like the idea that the team that amasses the most points after being mathematically eliminated from playoffs gets 1OA. 2nd most gets 2OA etc. means every team should have something to play for. 

[Taro T]

1 hour ago, shrader said:

So you’re saying that you don’t like a system that is anti-tank but still leaves in a bit of pro-tank protection by only allowing the bottom 10 teams to have a shot at the first pick?

It’s a cowardly setup. If you feel the need to create a weighted lottery (which I hate, by the way), have all of the teams involved playing for the same prize. 

No.  Don't like the system.  It's dumb.  But these rocket surgeons that run the league are going to do whatever they want regardless how dumb it is.

But, that said, making the system even MORE convoluted DOESN'T make it any better.  It just makes it an even bigger embarrassment than it already is.