spndnchz Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 Some links: https://www.nhl.com/sabres/video/thompson-locker-cleanout-6371652955112 3 2 Quote
LabattBlue Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 (edited) The only interesting thing would be if any of the players begged out of this sh$t show. Edited April 18 by LabattBlue 1 Quote
spndnchz Posted April 18 Author Report Posted April 18 Thompson McLeod Dahlin Greenway 😳 Tuch Zucker 1 Quote
Demoted Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 3 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: The only interesting thing would be if any of the players begged out of this sh$t show. Or if they beg to stay... Quote
spndnchz Posted April 18 Author Report Posted April 18 https://www.nhl.com/sabres/news/buffalo-sabres-locker-cleanout-interviews-quotes Quote
MISabresFan Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 Love the comment on Sabre's Leadership- "They're going to put together what they think is the best team and best roster " I think they were wrong. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 1 hour ago, LabattBlue said: The only interesting thing would be if any of the players begged out of this sh$t show. If it's a s**t show, the players ought to look in the mirror because they play the games. 1 1 1 1 Quote
Thorny Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 (edited) 1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said: If it's a s**t show, the players ought to look in the mirror because they play the games. Dude I’m honestly jealous. Like this is the management team you’ve been waiting for, in all seriousness - not snark. The offseason talking point is, indeed, “we assembled a fine team, they f*cked up coming in out of shape” Like, you actually got it: your management team is bulletproof to results mattering They used “the players came in overconfident” last season - so they are literally running back excuses now as far as I am concerned, fans looking to measure by the metrics the rest of the league does (ie standings) should be made aware they are welcome in the fan base, but a clear minority: they are welcome to root for wins, but that’s not what we are interested in doing here in buffalo Edited April 18 by Thorner 1 Quote
North Buffalo Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 Um why dont season have offseason training in Buffalo say every 2-3 weeks just evaluate where these guys are at... give them a month off then bring them all in? 1 2 Quote
Thorny Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 (edited) 3 minutes ago, North Buffalo said: Um why dont season have offseason training in Buffalo say every 2-3 weeks just evaluate where these guys are at... give them a month off then bring them all in? Because then it can’t be used as an excuse at season’s end get out of here with your iron-clad logic Edited April 18 by Thorner 1 3 Quote
jad1 Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 Don't know if the team is allowed to organize that in the off-season. The players would need to take it upon themselves to do it, hence the comments encouraging to do so from management. That said, the problem wasn't conditioning this year, the problem was roster construction and players too young to play outside their character. If you draft a bunch of finesse players and throw them on the ice at 21 or 22 years old, they're going to play like a finesse team. Telling them to lift weights isn't going to change that. Quote
Thorny Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 4 minutes ago, jad1 said: Don't know if the team is allowed to organize that in the off-season. The players would need to take it upon themselves to do it, hence the comments encouraging to do so from management. That said, the problem wasn't conditioning this year, the problem was roster construction and players too young to play outside their character. If you draft a bunch of finesse players and throw them on the ice at 21 or 22 years old, they're going to play like a finesse team. Telling them to lift weights isn't going to change that. This doesn’t seem to be the messaging they are going with 1 Quote
spndnchz Posted April 18 Author Report Posted April 18 CBA. Plenty of guys play hockey in the offseason. With teammates or other team’s guys. 1 Quote
JohnC Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 9 minutes ago, North Buffalo said: Um why dont season have offseason training in Buffalo say every 2-3 weeks just evaluate where these guys are at... give them a month off then bring them all in? A number of players don’t live in the country. I don’t believe the organization has the authority to require the players to periodically call them back to be checked on. Quote
jad1 Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 1 minute ago, Thorner said: This doesn’t seem to be the messaging they are going with Adams? Nah, wormtongue will spin it to get a few more years from Terry. 1 Quote
Taro T Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 5 minutes ago, North Buffalo said: Um why dont season have offseason training in Buffalo say every 2-3 weeks just evaluate where these guys are at... give them a month off then bring them all in? The reasoning given back at the B&GI's was that per the CBA the team can't force them to stay in Buffalo in the off-season (that rings true) and that they had limited communications with the individual player's personal trainers in the off-season as well (which didn't seem as true). At that, Ruff said that he plans on taking a significantly different approach to the off-season. It sounded like he wants the players and team to agree to individualized training plans; which one would've expected was already happening. Would really like to see the entirety of the coaching staff under Ruff (with the POSSIBLE exception of Bales) canned. But wouldn't be surprised if they only can some of the training staff (gotta have scapegoats) while bringing the rest of the staff back en masse. And, can believe that some of the players didn't "train the right way" through the summer as so many of them are kids, they might simply not know any better and the fact that they're pro athletes in their early 20's (for the most part) would have them getting faster and stronger simply by getting closer to their primes. But IF that is actually the case; then a WHOLE lot of management and the hockey department need to be gone; because THEY aren't kids and SHOULD know their roles within a professional athletic program. 2 Quote
North Buffalo Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 6 minutes ago, spndnchz said: CBA. Plenty of guys play hockey in the offseason. With teammates or other team’s guys. Yup but team needs to work together more. Quote
LGR4GM Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 32 minutes ago, jad1 said: Don't know if the team is allowed to organize that in the off-season. The players would need to take it upon themselves to do it, hence the comments encouraging to do so from management. That said, the problem wasn't conditioning this year, the problem was roster construction and players too young to play outside their character. If you draft a bunch of finesse players and throw them on the ice at 21 or 22 years old, they're going to play like a finesse team. Telling them to lift weights isn't going to change that. Which players were these? Quote
Dr. Who Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 36 minutes ago, Taro T said: The reasoning given back at the B&GI's was that per the CBA the team can't force them to stay in Buffalo in the off-season (that rings true) and that they had limited communications with the individual player's personal trainers in the off-season as well (which didn't seem as true). At that, Ruff said that he plans on taking a significantly different approach to the off-season. It sounded like he wants the players and team to agree to individualized training plans; which one would've expected was already happening. Would really like to see the entirety of the coaching staff under Ruff (with the POSSIBLE exception of Bales) canned. But wouldn't be surprised if they only can some of the training staff (gotta have scapegoats) while bringing the rest of the staff back en masse. And, can believe that some of the players didn't "train the right way" through the summer as so many of them are kids, they might simply not know any better and the fact that they're pro athletes in their early 20's (for the most part) would have them getting faster and stronger simply by getting closer to their primes. But IF that is actually the case; then a WHOLE lot of management and the hockey department need to be gone; because THEY aren't kids and SHOULD know their roles within a professional athletic program. Just an immense lack of wisdom in the positions of authority. It starts with the owner. 1 1 Quote
Taro T Posted April 18 Report Posted April 18 12 minutes ago, Dr. Who said: Just an immense lack of wisdom in the positions of authority. It starts with the owner. Fair read. Another thing that was interesting at the B&GI's was Ruff saying (and am paraphrasing here) when asked about leadership from the players (in relation to 1 of the leaders getting traded and another being healthy scratched earlier in the year) that things look different from inside the organization than from outside and his preconceived notions on some of the players that he'd developed from playing against them were off. And he did mention how the team did have a lot of leadership, mentioning Greenway and Zucker by name as guys that helped the team's leadership group; personally got the impression that if he had it to do over again he'd likely have either just gone with Dahlin, Tuch, and Thompson as the captains (C,A,A) or added the other 2 mentioned to those 3. 2 Quote
zow2 Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 They came back from Europe with two regulation losses vs NJ in their luggage. Never recovered from that quite honestly. Two games in and it felt like the season was over. 4 Quote
shrader Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 1 hour ago, Taro T said: The reasoning given back at the B&GI's was that per the CBA the team can't force them to stay in Buffalo in the off-season (that rings true) and that they had limited communications with the individual player's personal trainers in the off-season as well (which didn't seem as true). At that, Ruff said that he plans on taking a significantly different approach to the off-season. It sounded like he wants the players and team to agree to individualized training plans; which one would've expected was already happening. Would really like to see the entirety of the coaching staff under Ruff (with the POSSIBLE exception of Bales) canned. But wouldn't be surprised if they only can some of the training staff (gotta have scapegoats) while bringing the rest of the staff back en masse. And, can believe that some of the players didn't "train the right way" through the summer as so many of them are kids, they might simply not know any better and the fact that they're pro athletes in their early 20's (for the most part) would have them getting faster and stronger simply by getting closer to their primes. But IF that is actually the case; then a WHOLE lot of management and the hockey department need to be gone; because THEY aren't kids and SHOULD know their roles within a professional athletic program. I said it months ago and I still expect to see Peca on this coaching staff next season. The rags have to clean house at this point, right? 1 Quote
gomper Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 I like Lindy but I honestly don't care what his initial analysis is from him or the players. This season was a failure of epic proportions. Roster construction is flawed more than the O rings on the Challenger. In what world does a 30+ goal scorer have to take ot upon himself to stand for his teammates? I hate this team and the 35,000 foot retrospective overlay only makes it worse. F them. 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.