Jump to content

Colin Miller: What's he worth?


LGR4GM

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Miller averaged nearly 40 points per 82 games in Vegas and was a contributor in a Stanley Cup final run.

You have weird definitions of bad.

Check his last season there.  He pts dropped, his pt dropped and he was even a healthy scratch.  He was also terrible in his own zone during his time there.  So yes he was exceedingly mediocre by the time he got traded.  Also over 40% of his points came on the PP, something he was not needed for here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Check his last season there.  He pts dropped, his pt dropped and he was even a healthy scratch.  He was also terrible in his own zone during his time there.  So yes he was exceedingly mediocre by the time he got traded.  Also over 40% of his points came on the PP, something he was not needed for here.  

He had 29 points in 65 games in his last Knights season and was an analytics darling when we acquired him. The price of a 2nd and a 5th was generally considered fair.

“Bad” does not describe Miller’s play on Vegas. “Bad” describes Carter Hutton’s play in Buffalo.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dudacek said:

He had 29 points in 65 games in his last Knights season and was an analytics darling when we acquired him. The price of a 2nd and a 5th was generally considered fair.

“Bad” does not describe Miller’s play on Vegas. “Bad” describes Carter Hutton’s play in Buffalo.

Last I looked there was more to playing defense in the NHL than simply looking at a guys points, especially when 40% of Miller's points in LV were on the PP.  By the end of his time in LV his points began to drop off ( 8 points in his last 27 games), his PT dropped (from 21+ to 17) and he was an occasional healthy scratch.  

I wrote when we acquired him that he was defensively challenged, was going to be Baloo 2 and the deal only made sense if we were trading Risto. 

We didn't trade Risto and Miller has been terrible in our zone since he arrived.  To make matters worse, he was the 4th option for PP time behind Dahlin, Risto and Montour and has been mostly a bottom pair guy here on a defensively challenged team.  So yes he was bad in LV as a defenseman.  PP specialist he was fine, except that wasn't what we needed here. 

Buyer beware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Last I looked there was more to playing defense in the NHL than simply looking at a guys points, especially when 40% of Miller's points in LV were on the PP.  By the end of his time in LV his points began to drop off ( 8 points in his last 27 games), his PT dropped (from 21+ to 17) and he was an occasional healthy scratch.  

I wrote when we acquired him that he was defensively challenged, was going to be Baloo 2 and the deal only made sense if we were trading Risto. 

We didn't trade Risto and Miller has been terrible in our zone since he arrived.  To make matters worse, he was the 4th option for PP time behind Dahlin, Risto and Montour and has been mostly a bottom pair guy here on a defensively challenged team.  So yes he was bad in LV as a defenseman.  PP specialist he was fine, except that wasn't what we needed here. 

Buyer beware.

So Miller was bad in Vegas because his points slipped in his last 27 games there, you compared him to Nate Beaulieu, and his defence sucked in Buffalo.

Got it. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dudacek said:

He had 29 points in 65 games in his last Knights season and was an analytics darling when we acquired him. The price of a 2nd and a 5th was generally considered fair.

“Bad” does not describe Miller’s play on Vegas. “Bad” describes Carter Hutton’s play in Buffalo.

You are ignoring that his defense was bad in LV which is why his minutes decreased.  So yes he was bad defensively when acquired.  Not Hutton terrible overall, but yes it was a bad acquisition of a bad defensive player for a team that didn’t need his PP skillset.  He should have been gone long before now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

You are ignoring that his defense was bad in LV which is why his minutes decreased.  So yes he was bad defensively when acquired.  Not Hutton terrible overall, but yes it was a bad acquisition of a bad defensive player for a team that didn’t need his PP skillset.  He should have been gone long before now.

Then blame your boy Botterill for getting him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

I do and did then.  It was a poor decision just like acquiring Butcher.

This might be the dumbest hill I've ever seen anyone willing to die on. I'm serious. You're now bitching in multiple threads, over Adams getting a free 5th to take a flyer on a 3rd pairing defender because it cost 2.8mil against the cap for a team that has roughly 15 million in cap space. It's asinine. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LGR4GM said:

This might be the dumbest hill I've ever seen anyone willing to die on. I'm serious. You're now bitching in multiple threads, over Adams getting a free 5th to take a flyer on a 3rd pairing defender because it cost 2.8mil against the cap for a team that has roughly 15 million in cap space. It's asinine. 


you are 100% correct, but no need to get worked up about it.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

This might be the dumbest hill I've ever seen anyone willing to die on. I'm serious. You're now bitching in multiple threads, over Adams getting a free 5th to take a flyer on a 3rd pairing defender because it cost 2.8mil against the cap for a team that has roughly 15 million in cap space. It's asinine. 

So you think it’s ok for an organization to mismanage their $ and have poor player evaluation.  Gotcha! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

So you think it’s ok for an organization to mismanage their $ and have poor player evaluation.  Gotcha! 

So it’s ok to get a pick for retaining salary for a guy you never had but it’s not ok if you get a guy to do the same thing?


I have nothing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tom webster said:

So it’s ok to get a pick for retaining salary for a guy you never had but it’s not ok if you get a guy to do the same thing?


I have nothing.

There is nothing wrong with it, I just wish that he had acquired a player who could have helped the team.

Edited by GASabresIUFAN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

There is nothing wrong with it, I just wish that he had acquired a player who could have helped the team.

Well, sure.  He took a bunch of flyers and some paid off and some didn’t.  At worst he got a 5th round pick for taking the Butcher flyer.  Maybe he’ll get another low pick for him, maybe not.  Either way he’s gone in a couple of months.

It’s certainly not worth all the sturm und drang you are inflicting on everyone in multiple threads.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sweetlou said:

How about Miller, Anderson, and 23' Vegas 2nd rd pick to NYR for RD Lundkvist and St. Louis 22' 2nd rd pick.  

Would add depth to RD for Sabres and a good pick.

Rangers get added depth for playoff run and the ability to move Georgiav.

I could get talked into taking Georgiev.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, French Collection said:

I could get talked into taking Georgiev.

Not me.  Just too inconsistent.  Also, he apparently has some attitude issues.  I don't want near our 4 young netminders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • LGR4GM locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...