Hoss Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Waiting for food at McDonald's, so I'll fill you in. The #Sabres have jumped back into the Bobby Ryan sweeps hard. With Nash to NY it will That if NY can get Nash for that "cheap" they can get ryan for less too However if buffalo can't pull Ryan out of Anaheim within the next week or so, then buffalo will leave the table for good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Dwight Drane Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 What does Chuck Napkin have to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 I wonder what it would take - Stafford/1st? What position does he play? It seems to be general forward - but where does he like/mostly play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted July 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 I wonder what it would take - Stafford/1st? What position does he play? It seems to be general forward - but where does he like/mostly play? WAY more than that. A deal I've thought about making sense would be Stafford, Sekera, Adam and a pick. That might not be enough, but it's a starting point AT LEAST. Could potentially get a deal done. If it was Stafford and a first, Anaheim should just fold and give their players away. (I'm saying all of this after always being a guy who has seen Stafford as undervalued by many) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 What does Chuck Napkin have to say? He ain't got nothin on Joey Dirty Toilet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 WAY more than that. A deal I've thought about making sense would be Stafford, Sekera, Adam and a pick. That might not be enough, but it's a starting point AT LEAST. Could potentially get a deal done. If it was Stafford and a first, Anaheim should just fold and give their players away. That is more than CBJ got for Nash! Possibly Stafford/Adam/1st - anymore than that and it becomes too much i think. Stafford and him had similar points total last year so we are giving up Adam/1st for a player to be a bit more physical and for like 10 more points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted July 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 That is more than CBJ got for Nash! Possibly Stafford/Adam/1st - anymore than that and it becomes too much i think. Stafford and him had similar points total last year so we are giving up Adam/1st for a player to be a bit more physical and for like 10 more points No, it's not at all. Stafford is equal or less valuable than Dubinsky. Erixson is a legit d prospect. Artem is far better than Adam. It is kind of close to the other deal, but the Nash deal is still better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 I wonder what it would take - Stafford/1st? What position does he play? It seems to be general forward - but where does he like/mostly play? Left Wing, primarily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 To Buffalo: RW/LW-Bobby Ryan To Anaheim: C-Cody Hodgson LW-Nathan Gerbe D-Brayden McNabb or D-Mark Pysyk 2013 2nd round pick Would people do this? (it is a suggested trade on the ducks board) I think Stafford is equal to Dubinsky. Stafford puts up more points, Dubi is more physical. Sekera is a proven top-3 D-man, our best defensive D-man (according to the stats), which beats out the unproven prospect. And Adam has a higher ceiling than Artem, and a similar point production. Our first would probably he higher as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Was the poster a Sabres fan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted July 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 To Buffalo: RW/LW-Bobby Ryan To Anaheim: C-Cody Hodgson LW-Nathan Gerbe D-Brayden McNabb or D-Mark Pysyk 2013 2nd round pick Would people do this? (it is a suggested trade on the ducks board) I think Stafford is equal to Dubinsky. Stafford puts up more points, Dubi is more physical. Sekera is a proven top-3 D-man, our best defensive D-man (according to the stats), which beats out the unproven prospect. And Adam has a higher ceiling than Artem, and a similar point production. No. Too much. Ennis, Hodgson are off limits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 To Buffalo: RW/LW-Bobby Ryan To Anaheim: C-Cody Hodgson LW-Nathan Gerbe D-Brayden McNabb or D-Mark Pysyk 2013 2nd round pick Would people do this? (it is a suggested trade on the ducks board) No thanks--- if for no other reason then the fact we can't really afford to trade away another centerman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Anaheim seems quite happy with their D but wants a second line centre. Not our ideal trading partners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted July 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Anaheim seems quite happy with their D but wants a second line centre. Not our ideal trading partners They want a puck movin dman. We might not have the center, but they can make that move separately still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Sekera is worth so much more than Bobby Ryan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted July 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Sekera is worth so much more than Bobby Ryan. :flirt: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 If the Ducks aren't throwing in a 3rd rounder I say no deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 :flirt: I was only half kidding. If Sekera's going to Anaheim then he's the centerpiece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deluca67 Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 To Buffalo: RW/LW-Bobby Ryan To Anaheim: C-Cody Hodgson LW-Nathan Gerbe D-Brayden McNabb or D-Mark Pysyk 2013 2nd round pick Would people do this? (it is a suggested trade on the ducks board) I think Stafford is equal to Dubinsky. Stafford puts up more points, Dubi is more physical. Sekera is a proven top-3 D-man, our best defensive D-man (according to the stats), which beats out the unproven prospect. And Adam has a higher ceiling than Artem, and a similar point production. Our first would probably he higher as well Anaheim would want more. https://twitter.com/...624636035256320 Waiting for food at McDonald's, so I'll fill you in. The #Sabres have jumped back into the Bobby Ryan sweeps hard. With Nash to NY it will That if NY can get Nash for that "cheap" they can get ryan for less too https://twitter.com/...625149304803328 However if buffalo can't pull Ryan out of Anaheim within the next week or so, then buffalo will leave the table for good This line makes absolutely no sense. Columbus and Anaheim are in completely different situations. The Ducks don't have to move Ryan. In the end Ryan is likely to garner a better return than Nash did. Anaheim is not limited to a small list of teams they can deal with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Daddy Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Scott Napkin claims that Anaheim wants Brawny "Paper" Towel in exchange for Red "Solo" Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunkard Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 I'd love to get Ryan but would pass if the deal and look to upgrade the team with a trading partner elsewhere if the deal had to include Hodgson, Ennis, or Grigorenko. We are still way too thin at center to unload one of the few we have for a winger, even a very good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanny Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 That is more than CBJ got for Nash! Possibly Stafford/Adam/1st - anymore than that and it becomes too much i think. Stafford and him had similar points total last year so we are giving up Adam/1st for a player to be a bit more physical and for like 10 more points More teams will be vying for Ryan than Nash due to there not being a restricted number of teams involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Anaheim seems quite happy with their D but wants a second line centre. Not our ideal trading partners I agree. A team short on defence and deep with forwards would be our ideal trading partner. Philadelphia would probably be an ideal trading partner but I don't see that happening. What other teams fit that description right now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 I agree. A team short on defence and deep with forwards would be our ideal trading partner. Philadelphia would probably be an ideal trading partner but I don't see that happening. What other teams fit that description right now? St. Louis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robviously Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 St. Louis I hope Darcy is talking to them. Patrik Berglund is exactly the type of center Vanek needs and we have defensemen that they would want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.