Weave

Let's not get carried away here.

Questioning fanhood and suggesting posters go away because they fan differently than you do is stupid. Its also childish. And I know a thing or four about being childish.

Somewhere on a Kings forum someone psoted the same about the Sabres.

Why in the hell don't I remember that? EDIT- my wife, who is also from that area, does not remember a Mighty Taco across from the old Ground Round while we were dating. Could it be that it opened 1990ish when we were already moved out? Our late night/early morning Mighty Taco experiences were typically at the Union Road location near the Town and Country restaurant, where Guitar Center is now.

Lol You’re younger than me. No Mighty on French Road in my day. The Ground Round building was still standing on that site.

Oh man, that's my old stomping grounds. If my head cold makes a big reversal tomorrow, I'm in. I'll text if I can do it.

Judging by your avatar, you need to get you to the rod and gun club thread.

The problem is too many Thursday games. Buffalo Sabres Stats‏ @SabresStats 22m22 minutes ago Want a little bit of good news for the #Sabres next game? It’s not on a Thursday! So far this season, BUF is 0-3 on Thursdays and have been outscored 15-2!! On every other day of the week they are 3-1 and have outscored their opponents 11-7.

This seems like the least of any problems the team might have. And aren't we starting to get some scuttlebutt around the league that Ullmark is seen as more of a good backup/fringe starter type goalie than a potential all star?

IMO the last thing a team with a young core needs is rook behind the bench. It might make sense with a more veteran squad to bring in fresh ideas because the vets on the ice can provide good feedback to the coach regarding what will/won't work. A rookie coach won't get that much needed benefit from a young team.

No more rookie NHL head coaches, please.

So, we drafted and traded to build an entire team of below NHL average intelligence? I don't buy it. Every team runs a system, and most team systems have very similar elements to them. Phyllis isn't trying to install a genius level system here. I seriously doubt it requires any more thought on the players parts than any other team system.

Kane was a #2 unit PP guy, not exactly key, but he was a key PKer for us and so was ROR. Neither were replaced at the level of performance they both had on the PK, and you are correct, ROR was "replaced" on the PP but it isn't working out to date.

Is Skinner a PKer? I haven't noticed that?

Well, we dumped our most effective PK'ers (Kane and ROR), and one of our key PP contributors. Neither were replaced at that level. Can you smell that, Mr. Anderson? It's the smell of inevitability.

In the context of the title..... You aren't picking winning Sabres numbers.

They're all losers.

Now I know what Eleven watching a meme gif feels like.

This might be news to some posters here.

*feels left out of the ROR angst*

I don't agree with that. Getting to the net with traffic is key to consistent scoring in all cases, not just for bombing away from the points.

They don't get paid enough to make it a career. They have second jobs. Not unlike professional indoor lacrosse (or at least the way it used to be).

#settingthemarket. Here we go!

Oh, man. She brought a selfie stick..... And nice fish!