thewookie1

To be honest I see 11 as just another asset, like a way to exchange funds. For instance Kane won't fit on the Wild but the 11th overall would

I'm no where near that foolish, I've never been that out of left field

Slightly better D, and a few more points while averaging 24/25 minutes a game.

I'm unwilling to trade down

Trade them Kulikov and Peterson's rights for a 3 Or sign and trade Kulikov while retaining a little and Peterson to get a prospect preferably Debrincat

Aside from Lindholm none of the Duck dmen would be worth trading Reinhart. Montour/Theodore/ extended Fowler would be more Nylander worthy.

Tippet seems destined to be a bust based on his 5v5 contributions. I'd rather turn Glass into a winger for if there's a run on Dmen

Best part of the combine being here :)

Any inside scoops Brawn?

No thank you

If we trade Kane I would be very interested in being Vanek in for a year. Only because he's still pretty good and he could help our 2nd PP and shootouts. Use him more in the offensive zone and just let him snipe. He'd also get us out of our funk with the Bruins

Duncan Keith and Hyjrmlsson, or however his name is spelled, certainly are up there.

Jesus he was born on June 99th? :)

So effectively it should say, you're Buffalo. Enjoy your skilled locker room cancer or trade him for rubbish. Oh and that ruins any hope of us getting a Dman because I'm completely unwilling to deal Reinhart+ just to get Hanifin

Reinhart, Borgen, 8, 37, 55 for OEL, 23

I'd trade Kane, end of story. I just don't trust him as a person. He is likely a problem child in the locker room and I'm unwilling to give a guy with his persona a large long term contract. The sad part to me is he's the player I've always wanted in terms of on ice style. Fast, hard hitting, eats nails and can score goals. Also I can't see us keeping him and Reinhart and I'll vote for Reinhart every time over Kane's questionable off ice stuff. I read on capfriendly that someone heard on the radio in Chicago the idea of Kane(50%) retained for Anisimov. And while we are desperate for D, I'd take that trade since I think he'd be a great LW for Eichel since he knows how to play with puck possessing speedsters and play D.

I think he has a great camp, but Bots wants him to start in the AHL to many fans disappointment and by January he's a bit bigger and stronger and a Sabre. Similar to Guentzal's track

If the 4th best forward and the 5th best dman is there I'm taking the forward or trying to trade down.

MODO feeds the homeless and is a lucky charm for the Sabres and their AHL affiliate. I hope your Mom is doing better

No, Letang while great is a walking cast at this point

I think Risto can certainly be Seabrook+ not relying on a partner but not really supporting a pair by his merits alone either.If we need a vet Dman, we need one to teach him how to conserve energy and position himself better. Plus reduce his taxing TOI to a bit more reasonable levels.

Aside Condon who's a solid backup I'd have zero interest in any of them unless they'd pay us and they only have 1 year left

To LV: Ennis, Girgensons & 3rd Round Pick To BUF: Expansion Player = Bogosian/Moulson, and a 5th rounder Vegas gets 2 guys who have preformed very well when 1st line key characters and a 3rd

7th D or buried, no buyout needed

Risto's offense is definitely on the way to becoming Norris worthy, his D however needs work in order to truly become an "elite" dman.