shrader

That would be nice actually. At least that way I don't have to worry that the wrong person is walking by as some still shot of a half naked girl is on my screen or the text description of a video is full of obscenities.

Have we ever actually heard anything credible stating that the accusation was against Kane and Kane alone?

If Stamkos wants to leave, he's going to leave. And if he does, they're going to trade him near the deadline. They cannot let him walk for nothing. I feel like he'd give them the courtesy of letting them know if it was indeed his plan to leave. Granted he was much older, but they've already made a similar move recently with the St. Louis trade, a franchise icon. It would be tough, but they will if they have to.

I have bad news for you, Taro isn't real. :ph34r:

I bet there's a black copyright or trademark symbol somewhere in there. That would be a fun way to create a loophole.

No, not Spiro! I can no longer speculate about the whereabouts of Spiro Spacek, he and Jaro's secret love child.

So then it becomes a question of how much was there and if he had any matching marks?

Does it count as a color scheme if there is no color in it?

If they're trying to imply that no DNA being found down below clears him of rape, how does that mesh with the DNA found under the finger nails? I'm trying to think of a reasonable explanation for why that's there. What exactly is the claim they're making? Just some random possibilities that come to mind: 1. There was consensual sex and that is where the finger nail DNA came from. 2. He wanted more but she cut him off, and in the process of resisting scratched him. No sex occurred. So in the first scenario, the lack of DNA down below is meaningless. In the second scenario, the best I can see is that it accounts for the difference between rape and attempted rape. Would he get to walk there due to double jeopardy if they did present a rape charge? I'm sure someone can come up with some better ideas than I just did. The finger nail thing confuses me quite a bit.

Ford?

I just want to add to this that it's not just about the bag getting out, but that it got out with, apparently, all the identifying information still on it. There's a hell of a lot of explanation needed right now.

You could just go Despicable Me style and install a fart horn.

Yeah smell, I've joked about your obsession for a while now, but that comment freaked me out.

For some reason I read that as a barber shot quartet singing Enter Sandman. That's something I might actually want to see.

It continued to be an issue because he continued to use that same poor wording. At some point you lose the option of claiming that defense if you keep doing it over and over.

You stopped being funny hours ago.

I kind of wish they were only posted in link form. That way you don't have to worry about what is going to pop up on your screen at work.

That would actually fit my office pretty well. We don't exactly have many options here.

I don't think you'd have things soaking into the bag in this case. That's just begging for contamination. Any fluids are going to be contained within their own containers inside the bag.

Seriously, enough with the gifs and videos.

It's raining men. I dare anyone to top this choice.

Thanks. I don't know what I'd do without you.

That's obvious, but you still need to stop. It's way too juvenile. A bag that previously contained evidence is not evidence.

Plenty of games. I got to be one of those little kids on the ice once too. It really doesn't stick out in my mind too much though. Of course, I don't even remember what I had for lunch today.

For the 85th time, no evidence showed up at her door. Are you intentionally ignoring everything here? LGR, stop. You're not helping.