Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Yes, this walks him to UFA status as early as he could get there. It also gets his UFA money pushed out to when Skinner's cap hit is only a bit over $2MM/year and not hitting next year's cap when Skinner's hit is over $6MM. Which gives them money to re-sign Tuch and still add more to the roster this season and next. They still need to add a veteran forward. They still need to find a way to not have the coaching equivalent of dumb and dumber and even dumber yet; realistically it looks like that will wait until next year; which is ridiculously frustrating when the concern is Dahlin, Thompson, and Tuch will want out. Of course, Dahlin, Thompson, Power, and Norris are all signed through '29-'30 so there's only so much any of them can do to get off this garbage scowl. (But don't want Tuch bolting either.) If they'd've fixed the coaching and were to bring in that aforementioned F, wouldn't hate this off-season. (It still would have needed to have the GTing work out and they didn't honestly address it. But they would've improved 2 of 4 areas in need of improvement and marginally improved another. Presuming they do bring in another F, will improving 1 of 4 and marginally improving another be enough? Only if all the items they need to break their way actually do so.)
  3. I expect his best season to be the 26/27 season, as he sniffs the big money of pending UFA status. No stats to back this up but 80-90% of career seasons happen there. That will be when they will have to trade him.
  4. If the Sabres are F-ed at the trade deadline but Byram has played very well, there will be playoff bound teams very interested in his services, especially with another year on his deal. Or if Buffalo is somehow, someway, by some hockey God's almighty will in the playoff picture, Byram probably helped get us there.
  5. The defense would certainly look worse without Byram than it does with him next to Dahlin (unless Byram's game goes to *****).
  6. We can hope he has another great season in 2025-26 and maybe move him in season or after for more talent in goal or in the forward ranks as needed. I'll give the team credit to getting him to a fair contract but all things considered think this was the second best scenario of how this played out.
  7. It'll make it easier to trade him now that his price is set.
  8. Y’all were told the only successful course of action was trading Byram for offense. Which could still happen. Unfortunately, WGR and Sabres Twitter mandated that it was the only path to success. Now, just like the WR situation with the Bills, things took a turn in a different direction and we are calling it a failure based on predetermined expectations set by outside influences.
  9. Fair contract for both sides that now takes Byram to the point of being a UFA once it's complete.
  10. I would say yes. If the GM couldn't get a fair-value return for him in a trade, then it made sense for the player and the franchise to stay here. With him, our blue line unit is more than solid, it can be quite good. Of course, there is an assumption that Power will advance as a player and that Samuelsson stabilizes his game. What this short-term deal is give the franchise more time to seek better options if they arise. There are a lot of things to criticize our GM for, but not for how he handled the Byram situation.
  11. Maybe they should convert him to a top 6 forward and see what he can do.
  12. Today
  13. Why did the coach ride JJP? It surely wasn’t because he was responding to what the coach/es were telling him. So an old school coach coached like an old school coach. Big freaking deal! The player couldn’t handle it. I’m not suggesting that JJP is a bad fellow. What’s obvious is that he wasn’t as receptive to coaching and as resilient as he needed to be. In the end, the player made it clear that he wanted out, and got out. He was traded for players that filled other needs. What this backwater franchise doesn’t need is lingering dissatisfaction in a room already filled with a lot of existing frustrations.
  14. Especially since he picked Jarmo. If they don’t make playoffs, and Adams becomes POHO and Jarmo becomes GM, then you see more conclusive proof that winning is not a priority, as if we haven’t seen it since the lazy hiring of Krueger.
  15. Manageable cap, with the ability to move him comfortably now. Either we take him into the season or hes moved. At least hes signed. Get Devon done thanks.
  16. There are a lot of ifs involved in this team hitting its ceiling. We all see it and all we can do is hope. They need to come out of blocks strong and get points early when teams are getting their legs and figuring things out. Once mid season hits and teams start grinding for playoff spots the Sabres “softness” will be exposed.
  17. Goaltending could very well be better, they added a guy who might help out a lot, we shall see. JJP gets replaced by Norris and added production by up and comers. The defense is better The team is another year older. I seriously doubt this team will fold with the lead like last years team did at start of last season. I'd be very surprised if we see them losing games again after taking leads into third period where other team just runs over them.
  18. I'm getting serious Dread Pirate Westley vibes from this photo. Good signing.
  19. I don't know hockey well enough to have an established opinion here, so I come asking questions, not stating facts: Is the NHL clsoer to MLB, where you need a robust farm system to have any chance at succeeding? Or is like the NFL/NBA, where you can cycle guys out every offseason and totally revamp the team, but as long as one or 2 superstars are anchoring your roster, you will be fine? I ask, because to the totally uninformed (me), it seems like the Sabres are riiiiiiiiight there. You look at their 20 game splits over the last 3 seasons, and they basically play like a top 5 Eastern conference team for quarter-season stretches, and then a last place team for (more) quarter-season stretches. At each point in the last 3 years tough, they have spent at least a quarter of a season playing on a heater, including the end of last season. In other sports, that's indicative of a young team finding its footing and learning how to win. I ask my original question because it colors my outlook on this team: If the entire farm system needed to be rebuilt from the ground-up to get a pipeline of talent coming in that can get the team "over the hump"... to the uninformed, it would seem like they're very close to getting over that hump. If that's not at all how success is attained in this league, and it's closer to the NFL/NBA, where we're basically just treadmilling in the 10 spot with uneven play, and have a GM that won't plop down the cash to get the team over the hump, and what ACTUALLY needs to happen is trading away the farm(system) to get expensive talent that Terry won't pay for because a new stadium is being built for Josh, then I'll plan on giving up on the Sabres again this year before Thanksgiving.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...