dudacek Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago There are 18 forwards, and I'm wondering if Meyer is injured or has been because he's a weird keep and we haven't seen a sniff of him. It look slike Östlund, Dunne, Kozak, Geertsen fighting for the final 1 or 2 spots with Greenway injured. Quote
shrader Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Taro T said: Kind of surprisng that Komorov is getting brought back up. There was no need to waive him the other day if they were considering keeping him up. Is there another injury to the D that we don't know about? Because with Samuelsson injured, that would give them 9 healthy D on the big roster. He’s still waiver exempt, isn’t he? Teams play so many games at this time of the year with the timing of these moves. 1 Quote
Taro T Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, shrader said: He’s still waiver exempt, isn’t he? Teams play so many games at this time of the year with the timing of these moves. Yes, he's still waiver exempt. So, they aren't "sneaking" him down or up. Quote
Brawndo Posted 8 hours ago Author Report Posted 8 hours ago No Byram at practice this AM. He Kulich and Samuelsson are not on the ice 1 Quote
Taro T Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 22 minutes ago, Brawndo said: No Byram at practice this AM. He Kulich and Samuelsson are not on the ice And that's 8 healthy/available D for practice with Novikov. Komorov. 🍺 Edited 7 hours ago by Taro T Durn Russian names. D'oh!!! Quote
LGR4GM Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Taro T said: And that's 8 healthy/available D for practice with Novikov. 🍺 Isn't Novikov in Rochester? 1 Quote
Taro T Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Isn't Novikov in Rochester? He was recalled when Jones was sent down. D'oh! Meant to type Komorov. Edited 7 hours ago by Taro T Quote
dudacek Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Taro T said: He was recalled when Jones was sent down. The recall was Komarov, not Novikov 1 Quote
rickshaw Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Mtrka will surely be sent to Seattle for another year in junior, no? Quote
That Aud Smell Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 35 minutes ago, dudacek said: The recall was Komarov, not Novikov 2 Quote
ponokasabre Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 9 minutes ago, rickshaw said: Mtrka will surely be sent to Seattle for another year in junior, no? Yes he has to be. I agree he has looked amazing and really looks exactly like the kind of player we have been clamoring for. But he has only played 40 games in junior cause he came over mid season last year. I would personally send him back to junior and let him dominate, I would hope that his team maybe has an ok and then doesnt make the play-offs, then he can go to the Amerks for an extended playoff run. He then could be the big piece for the Amerks next year playing in all situations, maybe getting a call up here or there. And then in 2 years you could have a situation where he steps right into the top 4 of Buffalo. Maybe even as a Byram replacement with Dahlin Quote
Mustache of God Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, rickshaw said: Mtrka will surely be sent to Seattle for another year in junior, no? I'd imagine so, but I think he should be kept up with the team for the entirety of training camp so he can absorb all the NHL experience he can. Since he's on loan from Europe and not bound by the CHL rules, can he be "called up" to the AHL mid-way through the season if injuries happen or if they decide there's not much more development for him in Seattle? Quote
LGR4GM Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Mustache of God said: I'd imagine so, but I think he should be kept up with the team for the entirety of training camp so he can absorb all the NHL experience he can. Since he's on loan from Europe and not bound by the CHL rules, can he be "called up" to the AHL mid-way through the season if injuries happen or if they decide there's not much more development for him in Seattle? I don't think he can. Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Looks like the last two preseason games will be in ESPN+. Quote
Captain Caveman Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, rickshaw said: Mtrka will surely be sent to Seattle for another year in junior, no? Mrtka at this point seems more likely to go to the AHL. And yes, apparently he can go to AHL - I saw in another thread that the reasoning had to do with him being on loan from his Czech league to the WHL, rather than a typical North American player, not sure if that's actually what's happening, but several articles have been written about the likelihood of him going directly to the AHL. https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/buffalo-sabres/latest-news/mrtka-s-future-may-not-include-return-to-whl Edited 3 hours ago by Captain Caveman Quote
Ctaeth Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago They had a bit on after the whistle about what to do with mrtka today. Rivet said to send him to rochester because he is physically ready and peters said send him to junior bc he's just a kid. Imo, the decision should be made based on what skills you want him to improve. If you want to improve with the puck, send him to junior... he will have more time with it on his stick than in the ahl. Plus he can run the pp, which he probably wouldn't be doing in his first year in rottenchester. If you want him to begin learning how to properly defend against full grown men within a sabres like system then send him to the ahl. Quote
dudacek Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Athletic hockey podcast had an interesting and largely worthwhile breakdown of our division. Fairburn was good as usual with some of his usual stuff, but it was notable how non-invested the hosts were in the Sabres compared to the rest of the division. I mean it’s pretty clear that underlying the professionalism there was a strong undercurrent of “this team doesn’t really matter.” I think it’s reflective of the general tone of the national media toward Buffalo this off-season: we’re the awkward cousin that they slide over because they have to while waiting to get to the more interesting people at the wedding. As far as I’m concerned the team is reaping what it’s sown, but I’m not putting a lot of stock in what the national media is saying, rightly or wrongly because I don’t think they’re paying much attention. Edited 1 hour ago by dudacek Quote
LGR4GM Posted 59 minutes ago Report Posted 59 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, dudacek said: Athletic hockey podcast had an interesting and largely worthwhile breakdown of our division. Fairburn was good as usual with some of his usual stuff, but it was notable how non-invested the hosts were in the Sabres compared to the rest of the division. I mean it’s pretty clear that underlying the professionalism there was a strong undercurrent of “this team doesn’t really matter.” I think it’s reflective of the general tone of the national media toward Buffalo this off-season: we’re the awkward cousin that they slide over because they have to while waiting to get to the more interesting people at the wedding. As far as I’m concerned the team is reaping what it’s sown, but I’m not putting a lot of stock in what the national media is saying, rightly or wrongly because I don’t think they’re paying much attention. Several analytics models like the Sabres to make the playoffs. Quote
Taro T Posted 55 minutes ago Report Posted 55 minutes ago Just now, LGR4GM said: Several analytics models like the Sabres to make the playoffs. True, but aren't even those still seeing them in only the low 90's? If that's where they are they're still putting a huge portion of their destiny on others failing rather than them succeeding. (And yes, in the East, it's been that way for at least 3 years, so it makes sense for it to happen again. But it's just so frustrating to see them once again not step up in the off-season and put themselves in a position where it would take some serious bad luck for them to miss rather than needing some serious good luck to make it.) 1 Quote
dudacek Posted 4 minutes ago Report Posted 4 minutes ago 35 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Several analytics models like the Sabres to make the playoffs. Yep, there’s been a notable difference between what the models are saying and what the traditional hockey media is saying. I think that may be exactly at the heart of what I’m talking about. For example above podcast posed the question: Dahlin/Thompson, Seider/Raymond or Sanderson/Tkachuk? Nobody even considered the Sabres, despite the fact that by the Athletic’s own rankings Dahlin is a full tier above the rest. Instead they talked about Sanderson breaking through. Even Dahlin is an afterthought. The Sabres stink is a real thing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.