shrader Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Brawndo said: I think Toronto was the only team that could sign an 8 year deal with him. Whoever holds his rights can sign him for 8 years up until the end of the day today. So if Vegas traded for him, they then had the remaining 7 or so hours today where they could give him 8 years. The 7 years thing is strictly a July 1st free agency restriction. No one can give 8 years once they hit July 1st, not even the original team. Quote
TheAud Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago I love it that the Bills compete with any team in the NFL on the field, in the public arena, and financially. Whereas the Sabres are in an entirely different league than the Vegas/Florida/Colorado types. Truly a farm club for the real teams. Quote
thewookie1 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago Provorov working on a 7x8.5mil deal with CBJ Quote
Turbo44 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 10 minutes ago, TheAud said: I love it that the Bills compete with any team in the NFL on the field, in the public arena, and financially. Whereas the Sabres are in an entirely different league than the Vegas/Florida/Colorado types. Truly a farm club for the real teams. Cuz one team is a perennial superbowl challenger with Josh Allen and the other team is a perennial lucky lottery winner who would die to play golf with Josh Allen. If you don’t get my reference for the last part, it’s from the lengthy tage interview recently done Quote
Gatorman0519 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago Florida making a serious run at three in a row. 1 Quote
Turbo44 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 9 minutes …..hold on tight the ride is about to begin For you old timers who remember crystal beach ….not a ride like the comet or the mighty mouse or even that underrated yellow roller coaster. More like the spinning cups where you spin round and round, get sick and end up going nowhere Quote
LGR4GM Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: 9 minutes …..hold on tight the ride is about to begin For you old timers who remember crystal beach ….not a ride like the comet or the mighty mouse or even that underrated yellow roller coaster. More like the spinning cups where you spin round and round, get sick and end up going nowhere What? UFA starts at noon eastern tomorrow Quote
Turbo44 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 1 minute ago, LGR4GM said: What? UFA starts at noon eastern tomorrow They can officially talk to players now and announce deals. Can’t officially sign the player until noon tomorrow Quote
LGR4GM Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago Just now, Turbo44 said: They can officially talk to players now and announce deals. Can’t officially sign the player until noon tomorrow Not under the current CBA they can't. @Taro T feel like you'd know the answer here Quote
shrader Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Not under the current CBA they can't. @Taro T feel like you'd know the answer here They are not allowed to talk to the players until noon tomorrow. The tampering threat today with the Toronto stuff probably means that they're going to be a bit more strict about it right now. 1 Quote
Turbo44 Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 5 minutes ago, shrader said: They are not allowed to talk to the players until noon tomorrow. The tampering threat today with the Toronto stuff probably means that they're going to be a bit more strict about it right now. Yep I’m wrong - sorry/ read and article that had it wrong Quote
Taro T Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 4 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Not under the current CBA they can't. @Taro T feel like you'd know the answer here Correct. They had a "legal tampering period" for about 2-3 days prior to the new league year starting for a few years, but that is no longer a thing. Don't recall the exact year they got rid of that, but it's been this way pretty much at least since the MOU was agreed to. Quote
Flashsabre Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago It’s going to be Byram for Rust tomorrow. 1 for 1. I can feel it in my Sabres bones.😝🤮 2 2 Quote
Turbo44 Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Flashsabre said: It’s going to be Byram for Rust tomorrow. 1 for 1. I can feel it in my Sabres bones.😝🤮 Even Kevin isn’t capable of something that bad. i say Byram re-upped for 2/$12: Granlund signed for the same 2/$12 and Ilya Samson’s 2/$5m Quote
Turbo44 Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 1 minute ago, Flashsabre said: Sorry, Byram and a 2nd for Rust😁 There you go, KA certainly likes throwing away 2nd rounders for marginal returns. Only good thing is I’ve liked his recent 3rd rounders: strbak and the mean kid this year 1 Quote
Mr. MVP Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: There you go, KA certainly likes throwing away 2nd rounders for marginal returns. Only good thing is I’ve liked his recent 3rd rounders: strbak and the mean kid this year Careful. There’s posters on here that will try to make you feel stupid and tell you 2nd rounders mean nothing. 1 Quote
Turbo44 Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago (edited) Let’s have fun and make some Sabres predictions for the UFA next few days My prediction: Granlund lw/c 2/12millon Ilya Samsonov g 2/4 million Dmitri Orlov lhd 3/18 million Byram traded for a 2026 1st rd pick to ANA, lottery protected makes for a much better/much more experienced team and Granlund and orlov are character guys Edited 12 hours ago by Turbo44 1 Quote
Brawndo Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, shrader said: Whoever holds his rights can sign him for 8 years up until the end of the day today. So if Vegas traded for him, they then had the remaining 7 or so hours today where they could give him 8 years. The 7 years thing is strictly a July 1st free agency restriction. No one can give 8 years once they hit July 1st, not even the original team. I’m going to bring in the board’s CBA Guru on this @Taro T, but I always thought under the existing CBA a player had to be on a team’s roster at the that season’s trade deadline in order to qualify for an 8 year deal. So Toronto would be the only team that could do so in Marner’s Case. I could be wrong though. Quote
Turbo44 Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Just now, Brawndo said: I’m going to bring in the board’s CBA Guru on this @Taro T, but I always thought under the existing CBA a player had to be on a team’s roster at the that season’s trade deadline in order to qualify for an 8 year deal. So Toronto would be the only team that could do so in Marner’s Case. I could be wrong though. Isn’t that why it’s a sign (by Toronto) and a trade to Vegas? Quote
Brawndo Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Just now, Turbo44 said: Isn’t that why it’s a sign (by Toronto) and a trade to Vegas? I believe so Quote
Brawndo Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 50 minutes ago, Mr. Allen said: Careful. There’s posters on here that will try to make you feel stupid and tell you 2nd rounders mean nothing. 2024 2nd for Beck 2025 2nd to Dump Clifton’s Contract and a player who was traded for a 5th on March 7th as another cap dump 2026 2nd for JBD who was not given a Qualifying Offer Great asset management there Kevyn Beck and Timmons are good players but should have been acquired for 4th and 5th round picks Edited 11 hours ago by Brawndo 1 1 1 Quote
Taro T Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Brawndo said: I’m going to bring in the board’s CBA Guru on this @Taro T, but I always thought under the existing CBA a player had to be on a team’s roster at the that season’s trade deadline in order to qualify for an 8 year deal. So Toronto would be the only team that could do so in Marner’s Case. I could be wrong though. Yes, prior to the MOU a player needed to essentially be on a team for a full year to be eligible for an 8 year contract with his current club. This was done to keep players from getting traded at the deadline and then become eligible for the 8 year deal. This was supposed to be an incentive allowing teams to keep "home grown" talent as the team the player had been with was the only one that could offer 8 year deals; new teams could only offer 7 year deals. With the MOU, they modified that and allowed players that get traded by the deadline to also be eligible for 8 year deals. So, while the rumor was Vegas and TO were negotiating a trade for Marner because TO was going to press tampering charges, it is also possible that the reason they were negotiating was to allow Vegas to give him an 8 year deal even though technically they could only offer him a 7 year deal. And as to somebody else's Q about teams interviewing upcoming UFAs, that practice was eliminated with the MOU. (Was pretty sure hadn't seen that allowed since then; and that's because that is when the practice was removed. Really don't understand why they did that. It seemed to be a useful tool for teams, players, and agents. Thus they must disallow it. It made sense. 😉 ) 1 1 Quote
SabresBillsFan Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago I would hold on to Byram and you don’t want Samsonov he’s flipping terrible. Orlov’s best hockey is behind him so that’s a no go. But Granlund on the other hand is worth taking a shot on as well as Pius Suter Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Free agents disappearing by the minute. There's not going to be much left except a Boeser/Ehlers bidding war tomorrow. I doubt the Sabres do much of anything. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.