Does winning matter?

[PerreaultForever]

1 hour ago, Weave said:

 

You guys are forgetting basically 0 for the 80s (I know Taro, its not quite that, but 0 for the 80s is easier to type out), and the Aud was puny.  There were stretches of half filled seats between games against Adams division foes and games against Pittsburgh. Darth Sator, anyone?

You always needed to provide base level entertainment to get the fans to come.

idk, and it's been a long time since I lived around there so times and type of ticket buyers does change. If Buffalo is like Canada though (and to some extent I think it is) then they should sell out with a winner. Canucks are not much better than Sabres and they don't provide much extra entertainment and yet that's a really hard to come by ticket. Is it really that different?

[kas23]

I think perspective matters. 
 

For the league, having a team win on the ice doesn’t matter. It’s a zero-sum game and someone is always going to win. “Winning” to the league means are revenues rising. 
 

For owners, winning probably means something. Mostly as a status symbol. They usually make money anyways (see TOR). 
 

For players, until they get older, yes, winning is almost everything. If we had a winning team, they would flock here, palm trees or not. 
 

For fans, I think entertainment is higher on the list, but winning gives you that warm feeling, even though you had nothing to do with it. 
 

For Pegula, no, winning doesn’t matter.