GASabresIUFAN Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago (edited) Current Roster (players under contract) Forwards (10) Norris, Thompson, Zucker, Tuch, Greenway, Krebs, Lafferty, Malenstyn, Benson & Kulich (Cap Cost 35.23) Defense (5) Dahlin, Power, Samuelsson, Clifton & Byrson (Cap Cost 27.869) Goalies (1) UPL (Cap cost 4.75) Dead Cap (1) Skinner (Cap Cost 4.444) Total Cap 16 players (72.293) RFAs: JJP, McLeod, Quinn, Kozak, Byram, JBD, R Johnson, Brannstrom, and Levi Relevant Trade deadline moves A) Traded Cozens for Norris and Bernard-Docker B) Re-signed Greenway and Zucker Offseason changes, moves and retentions 1) retaining the services of both Ruff and Adams (and Appert) 2) fired the strength and conditioning coach 3) Hired Eric Staal as a special asst to Adams 4) Rumored to be trading Byram and possibly Quinn this summer 5) Rumored that Karmanos and Ventura will leave the organization after the Amerks season ends. 6) Rumored to be adding a senior executive for the hockey dept. Edited 17 hours ago by GASabresIUFAN Quote
CallawaySabres Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Just get a GodDam goalie and 2 defensemen please. Nothing else matters. Actually, better get 3 now that Byram is probably gone. 1 Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted 17 hours ago Author Report Posted 17 hours ago 9 minutes ago, CallawaySabres said: Just get a GodDam goalie and 2 defensemen please. Nothing else matters. Actually, better get 3 now that Byram is probably gone. Ain’t that the friggin truth. Amen brother! Quote
dudacek Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 14 minutes ago, CallawaySabres said: Just get a GodDam goalie and 2 defensemen please. Nothing else matters. Actually, better get 3 now that Byram is probably gone. This is what gets me shaking my head about the Byram conversation. Never mind what “kind” of defenceman he is, he was the team’s 2nd-best defenceman and +11 at 23 minutes night. They’re going to get 3 better defenceman than that this summer? I don’t think they’ve had three better defencemen than that in the last decade. 1 Quote
LabattBlue Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 17 minutes ago, dudacek said: I don’t think they’ve had three better defencemen than that in the last decade. Ahhhhh….memories of that dynamic duo, Messy Balls. 😂 Quote
tom webster Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 40 minutes ago, dudacek said: This is what gets me shaking my head about the Byram conversation. Never mind what “kind” of defenceman he is, he was the team’s 2nd-best defenceman and +11 at 23 minutes night. They’re going to get 3 better defenceman than that this summer? I don’t think they’ve had three better defencemen than that in the last decade. I think it’s more that he wants the chance to be a #1 and expects to be paid accordingly. If he would sign for #3 money, they’d keep him. 2 Quote
Stads Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Ain’t that the friggin truth. Amen brother! Quote
7+6=13 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 hours ago, tom webster said: I think it’s more that he wants the chance to be a #1 and expects to be paid accordingly. If he would sign for #3 money, they’d keep him. This is an interesting take. So you think he wants north of 9 mil per? Do you think he could get that from a team willing to trade for him, with the said team having to likely give a good player back? Quote
dudacek Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, 7+6=13 said: This is an interesting take. So you think he wants north of 9 mil per? Do you think he could get that from a team willing to trade for him, with the said team having to likely give a good player back? it's more like wanting to be on a team where he gets the opportunity. You don't get the big bucks without the big points. And you don't get the big points without being on the power play. Byram doesn't play on the power play and won't as long as he's on a team with Dahlin. ES points: Fox 40 $9.5M Karlsson 38 $11.5M Carlson 37 $8M Chabot 37 $8M Byram 35 RFA Chychrun 32 $9M Montour 30 $7.1M Pietrangelo 29 $8.8M Sergachev 29 $8.5M Dobson 26 RFA Burns 26 $8M Hamilton 25 $9M Sanderson 23 $8M Seider 22 $8.5M Josi 21 $9M Look at those numbers and you can see his point. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted 10 hours ago Author Report Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, dudacek said: it's more like wanting to be on a team where he gets the opportunity. You don't get the big bucks without the big points. And you don't get the big points without being on the power play. Byram doesn't play on the power play and won't as long as he's on a team with Dahlin. ES points: Fox 40 $9.5M Karlsson 38 $11.5M Carlson 37 $8M Chabot 37 $8M Byram 35 RFA Chychrun 32 $9M Montour 30 $7.1M Pietrangelo 29 $8.8M Sergachev 29 $8.5M Dobson 26 RFA Burns 26 $8M Hamilton 25 $9M Sanderson 23 $8M Seider 22 $8.5M Josi 21 $9M Look at those numbers and you can see his point. Why did you leave off Power's 34 EV points? Your post is further proof that one of Byram or Power is redundant. Dahlin is the 1st PP and Byram or Power on the 2nd. However, neither of these guys is able to carry a D pairing successfully on their own. Keep one and trade the other and then use that opportunity to get the "survivor" a real smart defensively responsible partner. It wouldn't hurt to get Dahlin one as well so that we can free him up to be even more dominate offensively. 1 Quote
inkman Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 12 hours ago, dudacek said: This is what gets me shaking my head about the Byram conversation. Never mind what “kind” of defenceman he is, he was the team’s 2nd-best defenceman and +11 at 23 minutes night. They’re going to get 3 better defenceman than that this summer? I don’t think they’ve had three better defencemen than that in the last decade. His counting stats are fine. It’s his underlying stats that get me nervous. He was flat out bad away from Dahlin. Quote
dudacek Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 7 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Why did you leave off Power's 34 EV points? Because this is a list of defencemen whose PP production helped them get paid. The entire point of the post was to show the coin Byram might be able to access if he got a shot on the PP to pad his stats. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 9 minutes ago, dudacek said: Because this is a list of defencemen whose PP production helped them get paid. The entire point of the post was to show the coin Byram might be able to access if he got a shot on the PP to pad his stats. Why would you put Byram on the pp when you have Rasmus Dahlin? 2 Quote
dudacek Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, inkman said: His counting stats are fine. It’s his underlying stats that get me nervous. He was flat out bad away from Dahlin. You know who else who had terrible underlying stats away from Dahlin? Jake Sanderson and Mortiz Seider For a little apples to apples: These are Byram's numbers with Dahlin GF% 70, xG% 53.1, SA% 54.2% These are Byram's numbers with Power GF% 50, xG% 42.6, SA% 51.7% These are Byram's numbers with Clifton GF% 50.4, xG% 46.4% SA% 41.8% These are Sanderson's number with his #1 guy, Zub GF% 47.4, xG% 56.3, SA% 51.2 These are Sanderson's number with his #2 guy, Hamonic GF% 23.8, xG% 46.2, SA% 47.3 These are Sanderson's number with his #3 guy, Jensen GF% 49.3, xG% 57.1, SA% 49.4 These are Seider's number with his #1 guy, Chiarot GF% 49.2, xG% 47.1, SA% 46.6 These are Seider's number with his #2 guy, Edvinsson GF% 62.5, xG% 51.6, SA% 53.3 These are Seider's number with his #3 guy, Holl GF% 0, xG% 60.7, SA% 56.6 Young D playing 1st-pairing minutes on mediocre teams don't typically have great analytics. For some reason Byram is held to a different standard. 🤷♂️ 27 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Why would you put Byram on the pp when you have Rasmus Dahlin? Exactly Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) @dudacek none of this info changes the facts that none of our D are good defensively away from Dahlin. As I’ve stated many times, I’d trade Power and keep Byram. I think Byram is the better player who at least makes an effort defensively and is willing to be physical. Power makes no effort defensively and will never be a physical player. I have also stated that there was no way the Sabres would or could keep both Byram and Power. Now that a Byram trade is more likely, I think we are kind of beating a dead horse. The Sabres have to fix the defensive skills of our D group and moving on from Byram is the first step, whether we agree with Adams or not. The next steps are sending our other D failures, Clifton and Samuelsson, packing as well. Edited 1 hour ago by GASabresIUFAN Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.