Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, LGR4GM said:

Impo, since Buffalo has Dahlin, forwards are much more valuable at the top of drafts than defenders. You can find 2nd pairing defenders pretty consistently in late round 1 and in round 2. But, the Sabres are gonna Sabre and there's a good chance in this draft, at 9 you get the 2nd defender taken. It could really pay off but we'll have to see. It's funny that 6'6" mrtka is "omg his size" but there's less of that with 6'4" Smith who skates better. 

The Sabres can’t find a second pairing dman to save their lives.

I agree though to take the best forward at 9 if it isn’t moved (Adams doesn’t have the balls to pull that off)

Posted

Given their most recent 1st round picks (Benson, Helenius in the AHL playoffs) and also Ziemer, and also the in-division dominance of tougher teams Florida/Tampa/Boston, I have slightly better feeling that they will prioritize the aggression in the player.

So I think there's a better chance they do prioritize Martin, Bear, Aitcheson, Smith, or Eklund (though very lightweight) over the less-attacking O'Brien, Mrtka, etc.

Posted

i'm real curious who the "Forton 6-7" are.

Misa and Schaefer would seem to be a given.

Does is include Hagens, Martone, Frondell, and Desnoyers, who seems to be in the consensus top 6 or 7, or are they down on someone in that group.

Does it include any late risers like O'Brien and Martin, or one of the next 3 defenders? Where does Roger McQueen fit?

Will they be more inclined to move up a couple spots if one of their guys is falling? Move down is they don't? Trade for a player?

Posted
29 minutes ago, dudacek said:

i'm real curious who the "Forton 6-7" are.

Misa and Schaefer would seem to be a given.

Does is include Hagens, Martone, Frondell, and Desnoyers, who seems to be in the consensus top 6 or 7, or are they down on someone in that group.

Does it include any late risers like O'Brien and Martin, or one of the next 3 defenders? Where does Roger McQueen fit?

Will they be more inclined to move up a couple spots if one of their guys is falling? Move down is they don't? Trade for a player?

There seems to be someone falling every draft, maybe they are banking on that happening again. Hagens, because of his size?

Perhaps their list has someone as a consensus 10-12 that they view as a 6-7.

I wouldn’t move down unless it is for Schaefer or Misa.

Posted
1 hour ago, French Collection said:

Hagens, because of his size?

For all his expectations, Hagens underproduced. He had two high end linemates, both of whom out produced him. Still, he'd collect his share of points by virtue of playing with them. The end story though is that Hagens was likely the passenger... Not the driver.

I haven't watched him though, so the boots on the ground report may say otherwise. Hard to argue with the scoresheet though.

Posted
3 hours ago, LGR4GM said:

 

 

I joked we'd take him when draft positions first came out as he's more of the same of what have in the system. It seems like he might not be there as things are today.  That said I prefer Carter Bear or McQueen. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

I joked we'd take him when draft positions first came out as he's more of the same of what have in the system. It seems like he might not be there as things are today.  That said I prefer Carter Bear or McQueen. 

I think you might be confusing him with Eklund, his winger?

Frondell is a 6’2” centre, Eklund is the small skilled guy with pace.

Posted (edited)

A lot of chatter that Frondell could go as early as number 2 to SJ. He is the most interesting selection of the top 10 to me. Polarizing between those that don’t think much of him and those that see him as a Barkov type.

https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/sam-cosentinos-2025-nhl-mock-draft-how-will-the-first-round-unfold/

This has Frondell #2 to SJ too. Passing on Hagens at 9 to take Carbonneau is not something I would endorse.

Edited by Flashsabre
Posted
40 minutes ago, dudacek said:

I think you might be confusing him with Eklund, his winger?

Frondell is a 6’2” centre, Eklund is the small skilled guy with pace.

Frondell is 6'1.25" with 0 and I mean 0 transition to his game. He's a shooting center and is more of what we have in the NHL compared to Norris, Peterka, Tuch, Tage... all shooters. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, dudacek said:

I think you might be confusing him with Eklund, his winger?

Frondell is a 6’2” centre, Eklund is the small skilled guy with pace.

No, am familiar with Frondell he got hurt early this season but came back and performed great and why his stock up again. Frondell has okay size but he doesn't play to it and that's what looking for in Bear. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I just want a mean-spirited bastard who will not be a defensive liability and who can score a little when needed. Think a McLeod type player who is a complete dick. 

Posted

As I’ve said before, the only way I take picks is within a Peterka to Chicago deal for 3 and using some of Byram’s value to get #2 to take Misa who is NHL ready.

Otherwise if we use #9, I want the best non-small forward/defender we can get.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...