Weave

Lol

Are there advanced stats for those?

Logjam…. LOL Every good team has a Zemgus. We won’t have one if we move him.

Yup. This is a faith based extension, not a results based one. We’ll see where it goes….

I think there is a fair amount of irrational exuberance and shiny new toy syndrome at play. Had any team hit on half their picks 2 drafts in a row? I think it is far more likely that we have 2x more Daniel Catenacci’s (remember how he looked in training camps?) in our prospect pool than Daniel Briere’s. I do think we may just have enough prospects to keep the team moving forward over the next few seasons. I don’t think we’ve got 6 or 7 sure fire soon-to-be NHLers like suggested lately.

Hell of a line of thunderstorms roaring through Buffalo this morning. It wouldn’t matter what airline you were on. I’m sure they are all delayed.

Our prospects scored more goals than their prospects. Shayne Corson’s son acted like the apple didn’t fall far from the tree at the end of the game. Sabres fans went home happy.

No analysis here. Enjoyable, entertaining game. Awfully nice to see good hockey on the TV again. And Buffalo was tilting the ice for most of what I saw. That’ll sell tickets.

And the average league hight went up 1.5”.

25-30 pts seems about right. I think if most of the kids hit near their ceilings Asplund is going to look more and more limited. But for at least this season he’ll be a useful middle 6er.

I wonder if a deeper team doesn’t negatively impact his scoring stats. He won’t be leaned on quite as heavily if the others around him take a step up.

Ugh. I’ve found the VPN I purchased last fall completely useless for steaming ESPN+. So disappointing….

I’d lean this way, but with so much uncertainty I’d never consider putting any money on it. Not even fun bet money.

We’ve seen his best. I think we’ll see a couple more seasons of it.

I boted #2 but I really expect between 25-30 is right.

Wrong Casey?

These guys know their *****. https://forum.tvfool.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10

Yeah, no player is quite like any other. I guess they are all unicorns. Really, generational QBs, WRs, CBs, DEs, LBs come along 2-3 times every generation. And Allen isn’t generational yet. He’s still got legitimate debate whether he’s #1, 2, or 3 right now. He’s not a unicorn. He’s an elite QB for this era.

By naming equivalents you just proved he’s not a unicorn. And what makes him a unicorn anyway? That something in his skillset wasn’t noticed or prioritized by the teams that passed him over? Happens every draft. And every few years one of them turn into an elite player. Glad it worked out in our favor for a change.

A bit harsh in an RIP thread, but yeah, I agree. Even moreso considering the butchery this lineage used to maintain the legacy over the ages. Stay out of Twitter if you want to maintain that opinion.

Who was on the off wing, Tuch or Okposo?

Take it again in 3-5 days.

Yeah, I’ll take voting for someone that potentially represents me rather than hope for a benevolent head that earned the position via heredity. Your mileage may vary.

Page 13. You indirectly commented on it LOL.

He has the reputation of a hitter. I haven’t watched him play either, so I can only go by what I’ve read.