Jump to content

thewookie1

Members
  • Posts

    8,136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by thewookie1

  1. Grigo too :flirt:
  2. Yes, however the product is lesser quality than the past two years. Leaving the scrimmage at 10 would of been fine to me, the 3v3 thing though disgusts me.
  3. Utter joke this whole thing. Hillary gets people killed and leaks classified documents and merely gets a slap on the hand. Guess it pays to have so much political power.......
  4. The 3v3 thing really pisses me off since it wasn't even filled with Eichel last year and it was free
  5. I think a bit of both are true, if we don't give Moulson a chance to bounce back Okposo might not like it along with many of the team's player that are friends with MattyMo. However if he gets the opportunity and fails they'd likely all support it it and potentially even Moulson deep down would know he's lost it.
  6. It looks better now with the Es
  7. Honestly I think it really could go 3 ways: He starts hot, then peters out by about the half way point He starts hot and stays hot in long enough stretches to be considered to have had a bounce back year He starts cold, stays cold and finishes the season in Rochester
  8. I'm guess if Lehner goes down Ullmark starts with Nilsson still being the backup
  9. The Es and the B look a little weird.
  10. I'm honestly rather disappointed, I won't likely be going now. I can swallow $10 at the office to thin the demand but the amount of people going already is going down with the lack of Eichel and Reinhart so making it $20 is unnecessary. I'm honestly curious as to the entire league supposed inability to be profitable aside from Toronto and Montreal with all the money we seem to bring in. Hell I even understood charging for the draft due to the risk of problems with overcrowding/ a gluttony of angry fans who go and can't get in. But this is merely a money grabbing move
  11. A tad better? To Buffalo: Landeskog, G Tyson Barrie's rights To Colorado: Kane, E Bogosian, Z 2017 1st round pick (BUF) (Top 10 Overall after lottery Protected, turns into 2018 1st and BUF's 2017 2nd) 2017 2nd round pick (MIN) 2017 3rd round pick (WSH) 2018 3rd round pick (BUF)
  12. My random trade idea of the day :unsure: To Buffalo: Landeskog, G 2017 2nd round pick (COL) 2017 4th round pick (COL) 2018 2nd round pick (COL) (only transfers if 1st round pick moves to 2018) Tyson Barrie's rights To Colorado: Kane, E Bogosian, Z 2017 1st round pick (BUF) (Top 10 Overall after lottery Protected, turns into 2018 1st and BUF's 2017 2nd) 2017 2nd round pick (MIN) 2017 3rd round pick (WSH) Then we sign Barrie and Risto to matching 5.8mil contracts 7 & 8 years respectively
  13. How high would you go at 3 years? I'd go 4mil But would you go 3.75? 3.5? 3.25?
  14. I wouldn't say dragging, propping up a bit sure but dragging alludes to him being completely incapable. He's not Moulson during his scoreless drought.
  15. McGinn's agent may have found underwhelming interest for his client at his desired price and has decided to settle with whatever reasonable offer GMTM gave him prior to the deadline. I could honestly see McGinn deciding not to try to grind out an extra 500k to just go and play with friends. Let's say our offer was 3x3.5mil and they were hoping to get 5x5mil. They go around and receive little in terms of willingness of teams to go that high, thus they negotiate with GMTM up to 3x4 or 4x4 and thus settle. It makes sense. Especially if we end up trading Kane, McGinn is a good 3rd liner who can float up the lineup in a pinch and produce. If we can get McGinn and Vesey, regardless of Kane, that tells me either Foligno is a goner or they are not so optimistic of Moulson's return to relative skill.
  16. I'm certainly not trading my 2017 1st, I have 2 2nds I'd trade however. He had 20+ goals so I wouldn't say he had a terrible year. I think Kane + 2nd + a 3rd could fetch Shattenkirk potentially. Kane(about 20%) retained and a 3rd for Brodin?
  17. I might not mind getting Vanek on 1year deal.
  18. Wasn't there a picture that seemed to look like it?
  19. Hows this idea? https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/144626
  20. I feel bad for Nashville though, in 8 years if Weber is contemplating retirement the Preds will have to pay out the nose to get him back so they can keep him from hurting their cap. 24mil cap hit penalty would literally sink a team, even if the cap is at 100mil in 10 years.
  21. 0g,4a, in 7 games at the end of the season
  22. Honestly I couldn't even of concocted either of these deals..... :worthy: I bow to Bergevin in making me look like a genius.
  23. Error: Weber is signed for 10 more years Subban has 6 years left. Makes it 12x worse Weber will be 40 at his contract's end
  24. UFA next year
  25. This is downright strange, at least the Hall-Larsson makes sense on a basic level with its projected values being blown out of the water. This one make little to no sense to me. Weber is 30 with 5yrs at $7,857,142 Subban is 27 with 5yrs at 9mil So Montreal gets older and saves 1.15mil....... wow......
×
×
  • Create New...