All Activity

I mentioned you quit the politics forum, because you SAID you were quitting the politics forum. I didn't single you out, you were one of many that I mentioned I I meant nothing derogatory by it. When you responded I even said I missed interacting with you. Yes, we disagree about many things. I try to be civil about it, but you can get all sissy, take your ball, and go home. Again. Hit me with another taylor swift video on your way out. Kinda weird for a grown man without kids to have that at the ready.

I would agree with all of this.

Yeah, I was confused and missed the draft too.

As usual, you're wrong, I DO understand that. What you DON'T understand, probably because you won't lower yourself to actually read something that came from Trump, is that the BBB limits reimbursements to hospitals regarding illegal immigrants. I'm also guessing you felt it was beneath you to read posts upthread showing Schumer requesting those limits to reimbursements, cuts according to the Democrats, be rescinded.

One Battle After Another was pure excellence. Straight to the top of my PTA ranking

I’ve wondered about it too and came to the conclusion that they probably would have the foresight ..but then I remind myself we are talking about the Buffalo Sabres under Terry Pegula and… well I’m glad I’ve got it, just in case

Protesting is one thing. This is asking to be a case study in Darwinism.

If I was wrong about the start time, sorry about that. For some reason, I thought it was going to be later tonight.

I've wondered if the Sabres also have something on file, thought of as the team foundered and Rick got up in years. Fwiw, Rick was always bad at the fake play by play stuff. The 75 vs. 99 game was OK tho.

What a cop out answer. If I understand you correctly, you do not support the violent actions of the "protesters". Good for you.

It’s really good. The only bad thing is all the stupid Hard Rock million spins commercials.

Me and my dad do have a recorded video of him announcing the sabres as Stanley Cup champions, just saying If it ever should be in need

But bad. Some risky picks, but happy with that

No, I should have added that trade in as well. I was saying Peterka for Doan.

If during his stint in Rochester he demonstrates that he can handle the rigors of the AHL, then keep him there. Let his play be the determining factor. From the little that I’ve seen of him it seems to me that he can handle the challenges, including struggles, of the higher league. One benefit he will have in the AHL that he won’t get in the juniors is mentorship by older players.

Sorry, are you saying Cozens was the top 6 and Norris is the top 9?

No. Only RJ is RJ. Accept no substitute. And it very well could stifle future innovation and creative thought.

I think this is simple. The kid has played just 43 games in Junior A WHL. He will not be 19 until this coming season ENDS. I would send him back to juniors and expect him to dominate and be a team leader. The AHL is his next step after that. He played a few preseason games for the Sabres against mixed roster competition, not true NHL teams in real games that count. He did ok but there is no reason to think he is ready for the rigors of professional hockey in North America at age 18. He needs to play a lot of minutes, not watch others doing it. I suspect that after a few weeks in Rochester he goes back to Seattle.

Not much beyond the expected fringe changes every team does every summer, at least- and certainly not relative to the “heads will roll” narrative sold last offseason

Speaking of score effects:

Wait, is this live now? Did I get the 1st pick?

I'd burn my Sabres jerseys in alumni plaza.

Absofreakinglutely not.

It’s not. -Hamas wants to use the releasing of hostages as a bargaining chip. Trump wants a cease fire. https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-gaza-hamas-trump-10-04-25 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna234632 -IMO blowing up drug boats yields little return so I wonder if it’s meant to provoke the cartels justifying a bigger U.S. response. We can’t bomb the drug fields inside sovereign countries but if the cartels respond with attacks on U.S. vessels, embassies, or DoS personnel that’s different.

I use the X occasionally to express disagreement. That’s what it’s there for. Equal but opposite to a like which I give out very abundantly. That’s the main reason why I took issue with your post: I don’t want it construed that simply leaving an X means there’s no counter point to be made lol. I use it if I think my contention would be obvious given the over abundance of words I’m already using