ponokasabre Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 35 minutes ago, Ctaeth said: Lol.. Great line, good for him 3 1 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago if you want to be optimistic, they have a .716 winning percentage over the last 7 games need to come out mad in the next game and take both points 3 Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 55 minutes ago, K012010 said: Hahaha it actually is so funny to read through the posts right after a loss, even one in which we got a point and recovered nicely after a very lackluster first period against a solid team. Some of you really don’t know how childish you come off following a loss. Reduced from a cogent adult to a tantruming five-year-old. 1 Quote
JP51 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago Just for reference this is the Sabres record thru 10 games 16/17: 4-4-2 17/18: 3-5-2 18/19: 6-4-0 19/20: 8-1-1 20/21: 4-4-2 21/22: 5-4-1 22/23: 7-3-0 23/24: 5-5-0 24/25: 4-5-1 25/26: 4-4-2 Quote
Stads Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 22 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: How do you think Power will do in the playoffs? There he goes Edited 9 hours ago by Stads 4 1 Quote
Bangarang Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago (edited) That outcome was predictable. One team was skating hard and winning puck battles while the other seemed content with playing for OT. As soon as this team starts building any kind of momentum they just piss it all away. These are the kinds of losses that you look back at as the reason why we can't get to the playoffs. Edited 9 hours ago by Bangarang 1 1 Quote
Broken Ankles Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 34 minutes ago, bob_sauve28 said: We are not trading our young defender. How many people hated Samuleson? Another GM, a real GM would. But one beholden to “their” contracts will not. Just think what it would be like to have Rasmus Andersson on this squad at $4.5 instead of Power. A more mature player at half the salary. Your implication is our hate for Samuelson is past tense. Mine is still there, it’s just on airplane mode. Let’s see how long the flight is before I reconnect. 1 Quote
ExWNYer Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 31 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said: if you want to be optimistic, they have a .716 winning percentage over the last 7 games 🤔 1 Quote
sabremike Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago At NHL .500 after 10 games with 7 at home. NOT. GOOD. ENOUGH. People are badly underplaying the very favorable schedule that is about to get much tougher. They really needed to take advantage of it and simply failed to do so. 2 1 Quote
HumanSlinky39 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, Turbo44 said: Playoffs we’re talking playoffs? Quote
Pimlach Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, bob_sauve28 said: Ruff blames Kulich on the ot goal I blame Ruff for playing Kulich. I blame Adams that Kulich is the 1C. I blame Terry for everything else. Quote
ASlugAbove Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, K012010 said: Haha just a classic childish, no nuance comment. I gave context and asked a question. Are we celebrating the losses? 1 Quote
Pimlach Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bangarang said: That outcome was predictable. One team was skating hard and winning puck battles while the other seemed content with playing for OT. As soon as this team starts building any kind of momentum they just piss it all away. These are the kinds of losses that you look back at as the reason why we can't get to the playoffs. Bisonette said it clearly, the Sabres have a lot of bad habits that they repeat. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Loser point is still better than no points. Winnable game but kind of an even game too. Difference might have been Sabres have Owen Power. The good takeaway though is they have some guys on the roster now that weren't here last year that go to the paint. They go hard net front. One can only hope this becomes more normal for them and some of the passengers from past seasons start to get the message and join in. If not, replace them. Starting to look more like a real hockey team, but we've been fooled before. 1 Quote
SabreFinn Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 4 hours ago, LGR4GM said: No. You trade Power it's for either a bonafide 1st line guy or more likely for a young player about to have that pedigree. To Sharks for Feŕraro and Musty. Quote
clink Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, ASlugAbove said: I gave context and asked a question. Are we celebrating the losses? It's all good You're taking "maturity" lessons from a person who uses personal attacks on a sports team's chat page How does one compete with fallacies of THAT level O' maturity 🤣🤣🤣 Quote
triumph_communes Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago They crawled back from a deficit. There’s an upside at least Quote
Cityo'Rasmii Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Someone please check me on this. Was Power on the ice for 3 of 4 jackets goals? Quote
Shoot da Puck Posted 46 minutes ago Report Posted 46 minutes ago Hold your horses here. The problem with this team for the last 15 years is failing to earn a single point in way to many games. The Sabres did this twice in 2 nights. I hate a loss as much as the next guy but the Sabres are trending upward and will easily make the playoffs I am betting one US dollar OR 10 dimes. Quote
OverPowerYou Posted 22 minutes ago Report Posted 22 minutes ago The Sabres always look slow and sloppy. One thing that drew me to this team 20 years ago was how insanely fast and precise their passing was Quote
Archie Lee Posted 15 minutes ago Report Posted 15 minutes ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, Shoot da Puck said: Hold your horses here. The problem with this team for the last 15 years is failing to earn a single point in way to many games. The Sabres did this twice in 2 nights. I hate a loss as much as the next guy but the Sabres are trending upward and will easily make the playoffs I am betting one US dollar OR 10 dimes. 4-1-2 in 7 games is good. Repeat that over the next 7 and they will have 20 points in 17 games; that is a pace for 96.5 points. But, on the loser point thing, I think the past criticism is that they too often did not find a way to squeeze a point out of a game where it looked like they would get none. The last two games are more of the opposite: failing to get a 2nd point by giving up the lead in the last 6 minutes of the third. Edited 14 minutes ago by Archie Lee Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.