dudacek Posted yesterday at 04:01 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:01 PM Not sure there is a bigger collection of defencemen in the league right now than what the Sabres have, both on the ice and in the pipeline. Power 6’6” Kesselring 6’5” Samuelsson 6’4” Timmins 6’3” Dahlin 6’3” Byram 6’1” Mrtka 6’6” Kleber 6’6” Bedkowski 6’5” Novikov 6’4” Komarov 6’4” McCarthy 6’3” Strbak 6’2” Is this intentional? Does it matter? Quote
Demoted Posted yesterday at 04:32 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:32 PM A bunch of guys that feel the rain first. I hope bigger means meaner. 1 Quote
Thorny Posted yesterday at 05:06 PM Report Posted yesterday at 05:06 PM 34 minutes ago, Demoted said: A bunch of guys that feel the rain first. I hope bigger means meaner. What goes up when the rain goes down Quote
pi2000 Posted yesterday at 05:27 PM Report Posted yesterday at 05:27 PM Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane. 3 1 Quote
Thorny Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 35 minutes ago, pi2000 said: Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane. Could hardly string together…4 words I Tarzan, you Jane Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago Just want to say it's a league wide trend. Especially with D. Quote
In The Buff Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago the bigger they are, the harder they fall? Size can be an asset for sure, but its not the size of the dog in the fight that matters, but the size of the fight in the dog. we could use some dogs out there... How many on that list would we say have that characteristic? Quote
tom webster Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, PerreaultForever said: Just want to say it's a league wide trend. Especially with D. That is actually contrary to the data. The mean height of NHL players has remained constant at 6’1” since the advent of the salary cap era. Further, teams with the taller defense are barely above .500 in playoff series wins. Quote
dudacek Posted 21 hours ago Author Report Posted 21 hours ago 21 minutes ago, In The Buff said: the bigger they are, the harder they fall? Size can be an asset for sure, but its not the size of the dog in the fight that matters, but the size of the fight in the dog. we could use some dogs out there... How many on that list would we say have that characteristic? Kesselring, Dahlin yes Power no Samuelsson Timmins not really Byram sorta? Bedkowski, Kleber, McCarthy, Novikov, Komarov yes? Strbak, Mrtka sorta? Quote
DarthEbriate Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 4 hours ago, dudacek said: Not sure there is a bigger collection of defencemen in the league right now than what the Sabres have, both on the ice and in the pipeline. Power 6’6” Kesselring 6’5” Samuelsson 6’4” Timmins 6’3” Dahlin 6’3” Byram 6’1” Mrtka 6’6” Kleber 6’6” Bedkowski 6’5” Novikov 6’4” Komarov 6’4” McCarthy 6’3” Strbak 6’2” Is this intentional? Does it matter? It is intentional, as it generally is more difficult to play against good defensemen with reach. Of course, the keyword is good. I do think you intentionally left Bryson 5'9", Jones 5'11" (one of whom is likely to play 40+ games in Buffalo this season), Johnson 6'1" (who I'm really not sure what the team thinks of at this point beyond he's a good AHLer), Metsa 5'9" (maybe top-pair AHLer next season), and Osburn 6'1" (possibly their best offensive D prospect) off the list. 😇 12 guys at 6'2" or over seems like it'd be above average though. Quote
dudacek Posted 19 hours ago Author Report Posted 19 hours ago 52 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said: It is intentional, as it generally is more difficult to play against good defensemen with reach. Of course, the keyword is good. I do think you intentionally left Bryson 5'9", Jones 5'11" (one of whom is likely to play 40+ games in Buffalo this season), Johnson 6'1" (who I'm really not sure what the team thinks of at this point beyond he's a good AHLer), Metsa 5'9" (maybe top-pair AHLer next season), and Osburn 6'1" (possibly their best offensive D prospect) off the list. 😇 12 guys at 6'2" or over seems like it'd be above average though. I absolutely did, but I wasn’t trying to be disingenuous about it. This was a “look at how big their starting six is, and look at how many other big guys they’ve been collecting” post. I read a lot on here about the Sabres needing to forge an identity. This defence corps - on paper at least - seems to have one: big and mobile. Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 6 hours ago, dudacek said: Not sure there is a bigger collection of defencemen in the league right now than what the Sabres have, both on the ice and in the pipeline. Power 6’6” Kesselring 6’5” Samuelsson 6’4” Timmins 6’3” Dahlin 6’3” Byram 6’1” Mrtka 6’6” Kleber 6’6” Bedkowski 6’5” Novikov 6’4” Komarov 6’4” McCarthy 6’3” Strbak 6’2” Is this intentional? Does it matter? I think it matters. Those are some big boys. Then again if they don’t use their size to the fullest extent then that sucks. Not going down that rabbit hole about you know who. I don’t get too much into the pipeline guys but from what I’ve read on here we can expect good things. Quote
PonyBoy2 Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago As the Sergeant Hartman asked in Full Metal Jacket... How tall are you Private Pyle? 5'-6" sir! Well...I didn't think they could stack shi* that high. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 6 hours ago, tom webster said: That is actually contrary to the data. The mean height of NHL players has remained constant at 6’1” since the advent of the salary cap era. Further, teams with the taller defense are barely above .500 in playoff series wins. Well then there must be some teams I don't pay attention to bringing the average down because it's definitely a trend. Now I'm only talking last few years and not since the salary cap but I don't know the exact numbers. Sabres are not some anomaly though. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago https://jokermag.com/average-height-nhl-players/ Quote
dudacek Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 23 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Well then there must be some teams I don't pay attention to bringing the average down because it's definitely a trend. Now I'm only talking last few years and not since the salary cap but I don't know the exact numbers. Sabres are not some anomaly though. 21 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: https://jokermag.com/average-height-nhl-players/ I'm a little confused. According to this, the Sabres starting 6 averages of 6'3.67", more than 2 inches above the NHL median for defencemen. Just running through some quick math on the conference, the Sabres are: Tied with the Devils 3 inches taller than Boston 3 inches taller than Florida 3 inches taller than Tampa 6 inches taller than Toronto 6 inches taller than the Rangers 8 inches taller than Detroit 9 inches taller than Philadelphia 11 inches taller than Carolina 11 inches taller than Washington 12 inches taller than the Islanders 12 inches taller than Ottawa 13 inches taller than Montreal 13 inches taller than Columbus 16 inches taller than Pittsburgh I don't know if it means anything, but it does seem pretty notable Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Well okay, I guess they are statistically taller (assuming Bryson's not playing). I guess Clifton leaving helped with that. It also obviously doesn't mean all that much. Quote
tom webster Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 6 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Well then there must be some teams I don't pay attention to bringing the average down because it's definitely a trend. Now I'm only talking last few years and not since the salary cap but I don't know the exact numbers. Sabres are not some anomaly though. Like I have said previously, I don’t post other people’s work but if you look up an article by Jonathan Willis, the numbers don’t back up your assertions, especially amongst playoff teams. The median height has remained constant and the mean weight has gone down. Florida was the third lightest team in the playoffs last year, ahead of only Tampa and Colorado. Quote
gilbert11 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 17 hours ago, pi2000 said: Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane. That’s Owen Power. Quote
ska-T Palmtown Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 8 hours ago, dudacek said: I'm a little confused. According to this, the Sabres starting 6 averages of 6'3.67", more than 2 inches above the NHL median for defencemen. Just running through some quick math on the conference, the Sabres are: Tied with the Devils 3 inches taller than Boston 3 inches taller than Florida 3 inches taller than Tampa 6 inches taller than Toronto 6 inches taller than the Rangers 8 inches taller than Detroit 9 inches taller than Philadelphia 11 inches taller than Carolina 11 inches taller than Washington 12 inches taller than the Islanders 12 inches taller than Ottawa 13 inches taller than Montreal 13 inches taller than Columbus 16 inches taller than Pittsburgh I don't know if it means anything, but it does seem pretty notable Well something ain't quite right here. If the Sabres are 6'-3 5/8" average ... and Pitt is 16 inches shorter, that makes them (quick goat math) ... 4'-11 3/8"? Honestly, nothing beyond being, say 3" taller than another team (using averages) makes much sense. That link was so ... click-baity I had trouble finding too many real stats. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago I hate the "clickbait" style thread title. ***** hate it. Several ppl have and are talking about it. NHL teams drafted 0 defenders under 6ft in the draft this year. Teams want size in defense due to reach. When power was drafted it was all "so rare 6'6" defenders" and now Buffalo has another 1st rounder (who might be better than power) who's at that 6'6" threshold. The problem at extreme height is leverage. If you can work under that reach, it's harder for long defenders to regain leverage which is why physically pushing you away matters there. All that said, there might be 3 nhl defenders in the Sabres rhd prospect pool. Bedkowski is less talented more physical Kleber so idk where that goes. I think Strbak is also ahead of both. Mrtka slots in at the top of that pile. Komarov might be a 5/6 in a couple more years. These are all RHD and we haven't even touched on Kesselring or the Dahlin plays his off side. McCarthy, I see no path to the Sabres roster he'd be behind 4 prospects at least. Quote
dudacek Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, ska-T Palmtown said: Well something ain't quite right here. If the Sabres are 6'-3 5/8" average ... and Pitt is 16 inches shorter, that makes them (quick goat math) ... 4'-11 3/8"? Honestly, nothing beyond being, say 3" taller than another team (using averages) makes much sense. That link was so ... click-baity I had trouble finding too many real stats. Sorry for the confusion. Those represent actual difference in inches of the six starters combined. So the Sabres on average are a 1/2 inch taller than the Bruins and 2 inches taller than the Senators. Quote
Ross Rhea Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Taller they are (Power) the softer they get, lol! Quote
Thorny Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 11 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Sabres are not some anomaly though. Hmm i strenuously disagree 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.