dudacek Posted 7 hours ago Author Report Posted 7 hours ago (edited) So Dreger said the Peterka trade has juiced the Bo Byram talks. Told Marty and Duffer that teams that had kind of faded because Buffalo’s push to get a RHD included in a Byram deal have been reenergized because Kesselring has made that less of a need. Dreger says the serious interest in Byram is 6-8 teams deep. Kings, Vegas, St. Louis, Philly, Toronto and (“weirdly”, he said) Colorado among those named among the front runners. Edited 7 hours ago by dudacek Quote
K-9 Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, dudacek said: So Dreger said the Peterka trade has juiced the Bo Byram talks. Told Marty and Duffer that teams that had kind of faded because Buffalo’s push to get a RHD included in a Byram deal have been reenergized because Kesselring has made that less of a need. Dreger says the serious interest in Byram is 6-8 teams deep. Byram to the Canucks for Pettersson? Is that at all possible? I wonder if his Swedish national teammate Dahlin could be an advocate. Quote
Thorny Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Adams hates Rossi simple as that. I would not have traded Peterka for Rossi however unless they added. I think I liked Peterka more than average here and I am pretty pissed we moved him for what we did but Rossi instead of him doesn't really fit with where this roster needs to go, especially if you are convinced Norris will play and be a solid 1C. Here's my question though. How much better than Will Borgen is Kesselring? Because to me Kesselring is 50% Borgen 50% Jokiharju so he's more well rounded than either of them but we're basically not making progress. You only like Peterka more than average around here since yesterday at around 11 pm you’re good 4 Quote
CTJoe Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 19 minutes ago, K-9 said: Byram to the Canucks for Pettersson? Is that at all possible? I wonder if his Swedish national teammate Dahlin could be an advocate. How about something like Byram, UPL, #9 overall for Demko and Pettersson? VAN say no? Leaves a gaping hole at 1B defense, next to Dahlin than would have to be found in UFA 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 46 minutes ago, Thorny said: You only like Peterka more than average around here since yesterday at around 11 pm you’re good Not true at all. Go back several years and when you were all raving about Quinn I said I thought Peterka was the guy to watch and I thought he'd be better than Quinn. That got laughed at by the usual people. So whatever. I'm listening to these Seravelli potential deals they possibly turned down and I'm just shaking my head. Adams really is a clown and there really is an internal cap. Quote
K-9 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 51 minutes ago, CTJoe said: How about something like Byram, UPL, #9 overall for Demko and Pettersson? VAN say no? Leaves a gaping hole at 1B defense, next to Dahlin than would have to be found in UFA That would work for me. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Not true at all. Go back several years and when you were all raving about Quinn I said I thought Peterka was the guy to watch and I thought he'd be better than Quinn. That got laughed at by the usual people. So whatever. I'm listening to these Seravelli potential deals they possibly turned down and I'm just shaking my head. Adams really is a clown and there really is an internal cap. What other deals besides Rossi, which I'm fine with passing? Edited 5 hours ago by PromoTheRobot Quote
Thorny Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) I saw it mentioned just as a theory by a good sabres twitter source that Bolduc would be the guy we get from STL for Byram and I honestly can’t unsee it now. It’s the exact Adams F add My money is on that shoot first, quick, ratio of 19 goals to 17 assists..this is going to be our guy Edited 5 hours ago by Thorny Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 19 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: What other deals besides Rossi, which I'm fine with passing? Quote
thewookie1 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 31 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: What other deals besides Rossi, which I'm fine with passing? Kyrou was on the table; not sure what we had to add though 2 1sts and 2 roster players; likely bad ones Rossi + a piece 1 Quote
mjd1001 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, CTJoe said: How about something like Byram, UPL, #9 overall for Demko and Pettersson? VAN say no? Leaves a gaping hole at 1B defense, next to Dahlin than would have to be found in UFA Petersson? I really like him (or should I say liked). I pushed for him as a top 10 player in the league 2 years ago, but its hard to not see that SOMETHING has happened to him. I don't know what it is, some say it was him signing the contract. Someone on a Vancouver board says he got hurt during a late February game last year vs Minnesota. I'm not sure. But he's been a different player than early in his career and its been like that for a while now. Since last Feb of 2024 in that game vs the wild (1.5 seasons ago), including the playoffs, he has played 102 games, has 21g and 46a. Thats a 16g, 37 assist, 53 point pace per 82, and that is over a full season and a half plus a playoff run, not a short term sample size. For $11.7 million per year, long term, with a no movement clause? To acquire him, it would probably be a massive mistake given his contract, unless he miraculously finds his game, or heals a big time injury here. For that money, I need a center to be giving me close to 40 goals, approaching 100 points, (maybe both?) over a full season But for the last going on almost 2 seasons, hes doing teens in goals and barely 50 points per 82. Edited 4 hours ago by mjd1001 1 Quote
mjd1001 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 49 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Not true at all. Go back several years and when you were all raving about Quinn I said I thought Peterka was the guy to watch and I thought he'd be better than Quinn. That got laughed at by the usual people. So whatever. I'm listening to these Seravelli potential deals they possibly turned down and I'm just shaking my head. Adams really is a clown and there really is an internal cap. If, IF, Kesselring is an above average defenseman, and Doan gives you mid teens in goals without being a total defensive sieve....then I'm fine with this trade. My slight doubts lie with Kesserling though, I just don't know how good he is. The automatic assumption is he will be paired with Power. But hasn't everyone said they need a stable vet d-man to pair with Power...that is what Power needs? Well Kesserling has less experience than Power. He's played only 2 full seasons..a total of 156 games, and he has less than half the total time on ice that Power has. Maybe he's good, but doesn't exactly have the "this guy has seen it all" on the ice type of experience. Edited 5 hours ago by mjd1001 1 Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Okay, so it was Rossi, Kyrou, or a mystery team with two firsts and two "players." Then one NHL exec said he thought it was a fair trade. So which part is making you upset? Quote
The Jokeman Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 37 minutes ago, Thorny said: I saw it mentioned just as a theory by a good sabres twitter source that Bolduc would be the guy we get from STL for Byram and I honestly can’t unsee it now. It’s the exact Adams F add My money is on that shoot first, quick, ratio of 19 goals to 17 assists..this is going to be our guy Ick. I hope not. Quote
Thorny Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 1 minute ago, The Jokeman said: Ick. I hope not. I think he has strong underlyings tbh. Edited 5 hours ago by Thorny Quote
LabattBlue Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago There is no way they are keeping Byram and tying up ~25-27 mil on 3 blueliners. 1 Quote
The Jokeman Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Thorny said: I think he has strong underlyings tbh. We need production. Advanced metrics don't count if a guy can't hit a wrister in an open net. I want a top 6 with a proven track record of 50-60 points with 20 or more goals in the NHL at least 2 of the last 3 seasons. Preferably at Center at least 6'2 and over 185 lbs. That or a goalie that can start 50 or more games with a GAA under 2.85 in 3 of last 4 years and at least a .918 save percentage lol Yes, I'm making up stats on the spot with no research but it's what I define as a good player. 1 Quote
Thorny Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: We need production. Advanced metrics don't count if a guy can't hit a wrister in an open net. I want a top 6 with a proven track record of 50-60 points with 20 or more goals in the NHL at least 2 of the last 3 seasons. Preferably at Center at least 6'2 and over 185 lbs. That or a goalie that can start 50 or more games with a GAA under 2.85 in 3 of last 4 years and at least a .918 save percentage lol Yes, I'm making up stats on the spot with no research but it's what I define as a good player. It will be a guy with the upside to do that and it will be a shoot first player 30-30 potential 25-20 current Quote
The Jokeman Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, Thorny said: It will be a guy with the upside to do that and it will be a shoot first player 30-30 potential 25-20 current And hopefully aged early to mid 20s due to be a RFA in next contract lol Edited 4 hours ago by The Jokeman 1 Quote
kas23 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, thewookie1 said: Kyrou was on the table; not sure what we had to add though 2 1sts and 2 roster players; likely bad ones Rossi + a piece The 2 firsts and 2 roster players; most likely cap dumps like the spare parts we got in the ROR trade. Quote
Night Train Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Well if the rumors of 5-6 teams calling the Sabres about Byram are true, it looks like a realistic opportunity to get a good return is possible. What about Trevor Moore from the Kings ? ( one of the teams calling , supposedly )..just one thought.. 4.2 Mil AAV for 5 years signed in 2022. 18 goals last year. 31 the year before. Fills JJ's slot. Not the physical game... a Lady Bing type. Quote
The Jokeman Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, thewookie1 said: Kyrou was on the table; not sure what we had to add though 2 1sts and 2 roster players; likely bad ones Rossi + a piece The 2 1sts and 2 players feels like San Jose trying to pass on Timothy Liljegren maybe Ty Dellandrea and 30OA in 2025 and Edmonton's 1st in 2026. That or Rangers passing on crap. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, mjd1001 said: If, IF, Kesselring is an above average defenseman, and Doan gives you mid teens in goals without being a total defensive sieve....then I'm fine with this trade. My slight doubts lie with Kesserling though, I just don't know how good he is. The automatic assumption is he will be paired with Power. But hasn't everyone said they need a stable vet d-man to pair with Power...that is what Power needs? Well Kesserling has less experience than Power. He's played only 2 full seasons..a total of 156 games, and he has less than half the total time on ice that Power has. Maybe he's good, but doesn't exactly have the "this guy has seen it all" on the ice type of experience. To be pessimistic he's bigger, but I'm not sure Kesserling is all that much better than Clifton. There's a ceiling not reached yet, but there's no certainty. 3 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said: Okay, so it was Rossi, Kyrou, or a mystery team with two firsts and two "players." Then one NHL exec said he thought it was a fair trade. So which part is making you upset? The return for Peterka. We aren't a better team after the trade and as I said elsewhere Peterka was one of only 5 players I really wanted to keep and build around. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 44 minutes ago Report Posted 44 minutes ago (edited) 1 hour ago, PerreaultForever said: The return for Peterka. We aren't a better team after the trade and as I said elsewhere Peterka was one of only 5 players I really wanted to keep and build around. Not better, if all you're looking at is offense. We got better defensively. Edited 43 minutes ago by PromoTheRobot Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.