Ogelthorpe Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Soft, unwilling to engage or unable, to small, issues in net. Sounds just like the Sabres. Lol 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 57 minutes ago, Ogelthorpe said: Soft, unwilling to engage or unable, to small, issues in net. Sounds just like the Sabres. Lol Sabres were like the 12th biggest nhl team this season or something but please, tell me more. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago I looked, 7th in height and 14th in weight for Buffalo. Quote
K-9 Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 3 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said: It's $120 for the entire year. Last September it was $150 for a year (iirc) and I seriously considered it at the time, but I thought I’d see how the Sabres fared first before sinking another dime for my time. Well, my revolt against the organization crystallized as the season progressed and I gave less and less of a damn as it wore on. But as usual, the season ended and my thirst for hockey returned, so I thought “what the hell” and for $30 I thought it was worth watching the farm kids in the playoffs. I just didn’t see the point in watching any more FloHockey when the Amerks got eliminated as I have no interest in the remaining Calder Cup contenders. But FloHockey is a good deal, regardless. Quote
Ctaeth Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago Amerks had a good year. I know thats not what people want to hear because they have their issues with the Sabres. But that was a successful season I do have one thing to say regarding the playoffs though. The Noah Östlund disappearing act in the playoffs hurt them bad. After that first stretch where he was figuring out the north American game, he was roughly a point per game player. They needed this guy to show up and he didn't. I know he had less opportunities bc of kulich, but you have to do more than 2 assists in 8ish games Quote
Ogelthorpe Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, LGR4GM said: Sabres were like the 12th biggest nhl team this season or something but please, tell me more. That makes their softnessl look even worse. Edited 10 hours ago by Ogelthorpe Quote
Wyldnwoody44 Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 6 hours ago, LGR4GM said: I looked, 7th in height and 14th in weight for Buffalo. And 31st in heart. 1 Quote
French Collection Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 7 hours ago, LGR4GM said: I looked, 7th in height and 14th in weight for Buffalo. Those numbers tell me that they are too young, lacking older man muscles. KA running it back will eventually get them to top 10 in weight. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, Wyldnwoody44 said: And 31st in heart. 1 Quote
Weave Posted just now Report Posted just now 7 hours ago, French Collection said: Those numbers tell me that they are too young, lacking older man muscles. KA running it back will eventually get them to top 10 in weight. Not if they all demand trades as they hit prime age. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.