WildCard Posted September 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) Edit Edited September 25, 2015 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) EDIT: nevermind, the game starts at 7:30, that's why. Edited September 25, 2015 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 @BNHarrington: Would imagine O'Reillys starting together w/Moulson is in deference to a couple dozen family members being here. Props to Bylsma. #Sabres. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 I don't like to play board policeman, but I'm pretty sure any talk about streams (let alone links) aren't supposed to be on the public forum because SDS could be liable. Keept it to PMs gentlemen :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 No Nylander, no Eichel, but at least there's Marner and Reinhart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musichunch Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 I don't like to play board policeman, but I'm pretty sure any talk about streams (let alone links) aren't supposed to be on the public forum because SDS could be liable. Keept it to PMs gentlemen :) My bad. I edited my post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 Good board play by Reinhart there Legwand looking good too. Wins the draw, goes down the ice, keeps the puck in twice, and sets up a pretty smart shot for his defender right there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 I don't like to play board policeman, but I'm pretty sure any talk about streams (let alone links) aren't supposed to be on the public forum because SDS could be liable. Keept it to PMs gentlemen :) You are correct and I think I may have been a little on the liberal side when it comes to mentioning my favorite site. If any posts should be deleted, I won't put up a fight. Also, that has to be the first time ever that a Toronto hockey broadcast, which I totally am not watching, cuts away for a baseball update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 You are correct and I think I may have been a little on the liberal side when it comes to mentioning my favorite site. If any posts should be deleted, I won't put up a fight. So would it be bad to mention that I love the right click-inspect element? Screw trying to find those little Xs. Just delete the code. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 I think he'd benefit more from being up all year long. I believe he's mentally and physically ready to take on the challenges that playing in the NHL would bring. I think he benefits much less from refining his AHL-level game. This is definitely where I am at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 I can't stand anyone in the Leaf's Front Office Reinhart still has to learn how to use his body. Franson looking good though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 (edited) So would it be bad to mention that I love the right click-inspect element? Screw trying to find those little Xs. Just delete the code. I have NO idea what this means. I can't stand anyone in the Leaf's Front Office And you, you're on the edge of unintelligibility with that ###### up apostrophe from nowhere. Why? Why in the name of all that's good and holy, would there be an apostrophe there? WildCard, I used to like you. But now, now you have exposed yourself as the worst sort of scoundrel. A man who uses an apostrophe to form a plural. A weak, base man. Strong men use apostrophes for possessives and contractions. Weak men try to use them for plurals. Like "these are our soup's today." Or, and this really gets me, "do you think the Bill's will win tomorrow?" Please, I want to love you. Please don't do this again. It hurts my eyes. [i am picking on you because I know you can take it. This has infected this board and I am going nuts over it.] Edited September 26, 2015 by Eleven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 (edited) I have NO idea what this means. And you, you're on the edge of unintelligibility with that ###### up apostrophe from nowhere. Why? Why in the name of all that's good and holy, would there be an apostrophe there? WildCard, I used to like you. But now, now you have exposed yourself as the worst sort of scoundrel. A man who uses an apostrophe to form a plural. A weak, base man. Strong men use apostrophes for possessives and contractions. Weak men try to use them for plurals. Like "these are our soup's today." Or, and this really gets me, "do you think the Bill's will win tomorrow?" Please, I want to love you. Please don't do this again. It hurts my eyes. Pretty sure that's the right way to use an apostrophe, because it implies Toronto has ownership of their front office :flirt: I could be way off, but I always thought something like a team, Bill's, Leaf's, Sabre's, used an apostrophe when describing something they own. Definitely not "Bill's win tomorrow" but "the Bill's new stadium"? Edit: If we didn't screw with each other this board would suck. Or, is it the other way around? '1000 Man Swords' is about to be our goal song after all Oh and it seems Lehner is still pretty rusty Edited September 26, 2015 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Is Leafs' front office correct? [ducks] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Lehner has me slightly worried Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabresBillsFan Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 (edited) I'm glad this is preseason because I wasn't to thrilled about trading a first for a goalie that was on the outs in Ottawa. But I'm not gonna ride this guy off until we see him in regular season games. We should know what we have by game 40. Lehner has me slightly worried Not just you buddy. Not many were thrilled by that trade. Edited September 26, 2015 by SabresBillsFan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Pretty sure that's the right way to use an apostrophe, because it implies Toronto has ownership of their front office :flirt: I could be way off, but I always thought something like a team, Bill's, Leaf's, Sabre's, used an apostrophe when describing something they own. Definitely not "Bill's win tomorrow" but "the Bill's new stadium"? Oh and it seems Lehner is still pretty rusty *Glares disapprovingly* Is Leafs' front office correct? [ducks] I believe so, although I also believe there has been some debate over it. Lehner has me slightly worried The season hasn't even started, you have to be at least a little more positive: after the past couple of seasons, I will gladly lose games 5-4 :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 *Glares disapprovingly* *bats my eyes* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 (edited) Pretty sure that's the right way to use an apostrophe, because it implies Toronto has ownership of their front office :flirt: I could be way off, but I always thought something like a team, Bill's, Leaf's, Sabre's, used an apostrophe when describing something they own. Definitely not "Bill's win tomorrow" but "the Bill's new stadium"? Edit: If we didn't screw with each other this board would suck. Or, is it the other way around? '1000 Man Swords' is about to be our goal song after all Oh and it seems Lehner is still pretty rusty NO! No, why do you do this? http://www.angryflower.com/aposter.html Is Leafs' front office correct? [ducks] Yes. Actually, it's Leaves', but ###### 'em if they can't even get the name of their team right. And it's fine, and better, without the ', too. Lehner has me slightly worried Also yes. Although, in my case, more than s'light'ly. Edited September 26, 2015 by Eleven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 *bats my eyes* Just for this I must insist you give me that gift card for beer you promised if the Sabres finish last :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 (edited) NO! No, why do you do this? http://www.angryflower.com/aposter.html Yes. Actually, it's Leaves', but ###### 'em if they can't even get the name of their team right. Wait how am I wrong but Swamp is right? (I purposefully ###### up the middle line, but ownership rule is correct, right?) Just for this I must insist you give me that gift card for beer you promised if the Sabres finish last :P *immediately closes eyes* Edited September 26, 2015 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biodork Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 (edited) My goodness, these TO announcers are terrible. "Moulson, SCORES! ... nope." :facepalm: Foligno, 2-1! Edited September 26, 2015 by biodork Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Wait how am I wrong but Swamp is right? (I purposefully ###### up the middle line, but ownership rule is correct, right?) Does one Leaf have the office? And why in the it would be possessive anyway, grrrrrrrr...see my edit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biodork Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Reinhart and Psysk with the assists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3putt Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Pretty sure that's the right way to use an apostrophe, because it implies Toronto has ownership of their front office :flirt: I could be way off, but I always thought something like a team, Bill's, Leaf's, Sabre's, used an apostrophe when describing something they own. Definitely not "Bill's win tomorrow" but "the Bill's new stadium"? Edit: If we didn't screw with each other this board would suck. Or, is it the other way around? '1000 Man Swords' is about to be our goal song after all Oh and it seems Lehner is still pretty rusty I read earlier that they are voting on making it 1000 man penis' or was it peni? Maybe 11 can help a SSer out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.