kas23

Anyone still dismissing Cozens isn’t a Mitts 2.0 situation in the making?

Let’s say this is real. Who would we want, Brisson or Coughlin?

Sound about right. To me, this sounds like Terry rejecting a better trade offer in order to save money a la the ROR trade.

I’m still pissed about him being a dick and having daddy demand a trade for him.

First quarter of the Bills game was horrible. The whole first half was horrible.

Maybe that #22 should come up and Cozens sent down. He seems to another Mitts situation in the making.

Seriously, how long does Quinn and Peterka stay down there? Seems to me both have more than earned a call up.

Imagine how disgusting that food must taste by now? In reality, I bet you it hasn’t twisted and turned as much as they claim. Probably has never twisted either.

Jack should get going on the grievance. Until then, how can anyone have any sympathy for him during this impasse? The CBA is clear in what should be done in such a situation.

It was a list of Vegas players only.

For this very reason, I would demand him be included or deal is off. Then would leak the offer.

And based on what people say on here, neither is Krebs. I’ve never seen either play. Are we talking about 2C prospects here?

Good thought. But this would be akin to GMTM’s speed up the rebuild by sacrificing some of the future. Let’s do this right and let this play out and get the most possible for him. It’s a marathon, not a sprint. We’re not built for a deep playoff run this year.

The best part of that series is supposed to be the sequel. The one with Shea Theodore in it. Ending apparently in mind blowing.

Good. Quenneville has acted like a top shelf douche throughout this whole thing. Hope he’s done from the NHL.

Hutton can give him a name of an eye doctor if he needs one.

Yeah, I don’t want UPL stinking up the joint and leading to continuous losing. I want confidence growing down there, not decreasing. And I agree the game planning would likely change if we have a continued liability in net.

Not really. You have one playing on your TV and the other on your phone. 😂

I would think it would be poetic justice if Brisson helped facilitate a trade involving his own son going to the Sabres and we ended up winning the Cup before Jack does. Seriously, the Knight’s window is closing more quickly than we previously though.

I think it depends on whether the insurance company has to comply with the arbitrator’s decision. We know the Sabres will have to, but why would a 3rd party insurer have to? I don’t know, but I’m sure it’s in the fine print of the policy. A grievance would certainly help the Sabres, regardless of the decision. But, they can’t file it, Jack has to and the odds are heavily stacked against him.

Can’t imagine that. It would be like us getting pissed off Montreal flipping Scandella for a better return.

Darcy would’ve consummated this trade already and for a high return.

On the sample token, we could also do the same thing. Flip an injured unknown for Marner, then turn around and trade a healthy Marner for likely more than we could get for Eichel today.

I wouldn’t be surprised if meatballs is holding them back, then going full sprint at the end. We saw what happens when they go full throttle from the very start, they may get tired.

I’m wondering what the ramifications a filed grievance will have on the insurance situation. The media keeps saying Jack is gearing up to file a grievance and the Sabres are looking to avoid it like the plague. First, I doubt this is the truth. However, are these medical grievance rulings binding? If so, binding to who? What would happen if they rule against the wishes of the insurance company? I don’t think a 3rd party insurance agency would be compelled to follow a ruling of an NHL medical grievance. However, I think someone on here suggested the NHL has a single insurer. If this is the case, they may be more willing to go along with a grievance ruling. And if they are, how could this not be a good thing for the Sabres? That said, I don’t see Jack winning this hearing.