thewookie1

Foligno, Ennis, and 38th for Fowler and either a voided NMC Bieksa or Stoner?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py1DILray2Y

From a legitimate Bruins source, bcbruins1, on the Hfboards (He's confirmed by the Moderator there too.) Wow, we posted almost simultaniously on the same thing lol

0 he will have a player, ex: Jack Eichel, give the announcement

I'd be willing to give Stamkos 4x12mil, but every year longer I'd subtract 1mil so 5x11, 6x10, 7x9 Mainly because we could make it work if the cap goes up to 73mil Foligno gets 3x2.35 Girgs gets 2x2.5 Risto gets 6x5.5 Vesey gets 2x975k(ELC numbers?) McCabe gets 3x1.55 Nelson gets 2x1.25 We'd have 1mil in space left, trading Ennis and/or Franson would free up to 8mil in cap space

Are they drunk?

We have 3 remaining We have had 5 different 3rds this year. BUF VAN from Neuvirth deal to NYI then used as Bylsma's compensation STL from the Miller trade DAL from the Enroth deal MIN from the McGinn trade then used to acquire Vesey

He will sign a ELC on Weds, I predict

The REV line, Reinhart, Eichel, Vesey

Called it! Now lets get this guy a contract!

Gorges is slow, but to get into the playoffs next year he'll suffice. Not to mention he is a vet and has played in the playoffs before so he's likely rather useful.

I'd bring him in as a 6th/7th defense.

Someone proposed this on the hfboards..... Pysyk for Pearson (LAK) What do you guys think, it was met with support from both sides. Also who would you rather have? Yandle or Stamkos

I'd assume because many others want Stamkos/Okposo which I could understand they don't want that chance destroyed

If its legit, holy cow that'd be a steal. I'd take a guess though that it'd be more like, based on this "rumor" #3 for Foligno, #8, B level prospect, and a 3rd. Either that or we'd have to take Hartnell's contract instead of the B prospect I'd trade a late 3rd for Vesey's rights.

Why not, as long as he comes cheaply. A 3rd or 2 3rds would be fine. His contract ends in 2 years anyway so his money won't be a problem in the future.

Rivet is a good analyst, but he does love players similar to him. But that does make sense

Craig Custance ‏@CraigCustance 23m23 minutes ago Goligoski deal is done. Stars get 2016 5th-round pick in return from Arizona for negotiating rights to defenseman Alex Goligoski. Worrying

Zemgus himself just shot down this rumor with a meme. @zemgus94

You're nuts if you want to trade Reinhart for anything short of a legit Top 2 D man Ryan Murray like Blue doesn't strike me as anything near being worth Reinhart not to mention adding the 8th pick.

Be sure to wear a Sabres jersey

Out of them that's the only one I'd even touch presently. I'd try to get it down to #38 and a 2nd next year for Vanek and #15 I'd rather take Pommers though, I fear Vaneks influence on the youngsters I'd take a guess they'll trade others and let go of UFAs before trading Malkin. Unless Malkin wants out, he's there like Kane and Toews are tied to Chicago. Fleury is a more likely casualty of the cap situation.

never

Unsure what I'd do with that, its very tempting and seems safe enough to pull off since we'd still have a 1st and enough other assets to move back up if we so wished too. But Shattenkirk would be a 3rd 5mil + RHD It does give us a puck moving Dman however. If we make that trade though I'd be concerned about Bogosian's future since I can't see us tying up 18 mil + in cap on just RHDs with Risto around 6mil, Bogo at 5.25 and Shattenkirk likely making something similar. Granted, Bogo was mentioned as being liked by Edmonton but aside Hall I'm really underwhelmed by our options aside from him and the 4th Overall. And value wise Bogo + 28 =s 4?? I guess it would be in theory possible based on contract status of Shattenkirk vs Bogosian but that still leaves us lacking a LHD.

Looks like Eichel likes his new number