thewookie1

Hopefully they break each other to an extent they just let us in the playoffs

How much would Dumba be worth if we dealt him?

I don't trade him then. If we can't get a giant return; there's no way to save ticket sales otherwise

I will always wonder why Botts didn't trade Risto + a 4th for Ehlers Why would a GM in any circumstance, go into a season with 4 LHDs and 5 RHDs after literally acquiring another RHD without having a general strategy to divest from one of the RHDs? Then choose to trade Scandella over a month early while still within easy distance of a playoff spot to a team we were chasing the spot with. It still completely baffles me. We very likely go to the playoffs last year with almost any differing scenario including acquiring Ehlers or merely keeping Scandella. Where Tim Murray played "all in" on every hand; Botterill seemed to think he was playing Go Fish Adams thus far has done mediocre in trades. Johansson for Staal was a great trade, and made great sense. Staal however chose to give little to nothing each game which sullied the trade. He then dealt him for a 3rd & 5th rounder which was a solid return seeing as Johansson likely wouldn't of fetched even that. Now Montreal goes on a run and the picks get effectively trashed. Montour was a shrug. Hall was the only bad trade he made thus far and that may have had other circumstances behind it. In the end his likely trade of Eichel will decide his fate; can he find a way to extract as much value out of Eichel as conceivably possible or does he trip over his own feet like Botts did with ROR. No Eichel trade will satisfy us entirely as we will lose the best player in the deal and the whole purpose of much of our suffering in the tank years. However there is a great deal of difference between Adams acquiring 3OA, Zegras and Comtois and Adams acquiring Rakell, Henrique, and a JAG prospect. The former would inspire sadness but have genuine hope stemming from it where as the latter would make me want to curl up in a ball and cry.

Add their 2022 1st too 🙂

Technically you have to boil a lot of it down due to cap issues. The more concise version would be Glass, Krebs, Tuch, Smith/Fleury, 2021 & 2022 1sts But then I still felt it was a tad light so I added Hague. From there it slowly spiraled into a 10 player deal

I'd rather take Beniers 1st and let Seattle choose between Eklund and Power in that case. We'd win either way. 3OA to me is a solid prospect but not one worth anything near a Zegras/Dach type. I want a Zegras/Dach type as evidence they don't intend to sit on their hands the next few years hoping to get 1OA again. I want to at least have a slight hope for a playoff berth if things fall a certain way.

Why exactly, I don't see what makes him all that special?

Well he was a cap dump/depth.

Well Vegas should certainly help in driving up the price for Eichel

What do you guys think of this monstrosity I just proposed lol https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2499551

What's Glass like? I'd imagine a Vegas trade would be more or less a fleecing job(as much as you can when still trading the best player) due to Vegas's "go big or go home" strategy.

I think we do get someone of that tier to be honest; the fact GMs are saying the price is too high and what not makes me feel confident that eventually a team will step up their offer.

Then I guess Dach 🙂

I need someone to play 1C next year, the last thing I want to do is send a Center group of Zegras, Cozens, Mitts and Girgs; they'll get ran over.

Quick question, if we could trade Reinhart for 9OA with Vancouver, I wonder if we could finagle that 9OA to get Cirelli from Tampa.

Here's a monster trade Glass, Krebs, Tuch, Smith, Reaves, Fleury, Holden and VGK's 1sts in 2021 and 2022 for Eichel, Olofsson and Ristolainen(50%)

Eichel for Dach, Reichel, 11th OA and some type of lottery protected 1st in 2022 would be my target.

Rest In Peace Mr. Robert.

I thought of a Tkachuk extension of 5x8mil

No thanks, no interest in keeping him in the East for lukewarm returns

He's 1 year left with his contract as the season year changes over. So he should be able to discuss extensions.

What would you think we'd extend Tkachuk for? I wouldn't trade for him without 1

Reinhart for Tkachuk anyone? I'd rather keep Reinhart but if he's determined to leave then sure.

Depends on my circumstances to be honest. Give Barkov, Eichel’s contract and my current roster; it would certainly be a tempting offer however I’d likely try to switch one of the Centers out due to the sheer depth it would gouge out. Additionally 50/50 is a tad under reporting the many outcomes that could come in the future. For instance if we have a 50% chance of getting great Eichel, a 10% chance 90% Eichel and then it cascades from there then I’d say yes with my previous caveat. After all a 75% Eichel or Barkov is likely better than any of the other players mentioned.