Scottysabres Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Sidc3000 said: Why? What made you think they turned the corner? They’ve so far avoided their annual mid/late November 10+ game losing streak. Which, as I pointed out, has become an annual event. Quote
Jävə Keith Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 10 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Went to the David Byrne concert. Not sorry I missed the game. While you were enjoying the concert, we got to watch our own Psycho Killer! "Qu'est-ce que c'est?" in the Sabres instance is French for WTF? Edited 1 hour ago by Jävə Keith Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 9 hours ago, Crusader1969 said: I'm glad you can admit the Flyers goalie was better If you look at the expected goals. Flyers were at 5.38 and got 5. So he was ok at best Sabres were at 5.72 and scored 2 The Flyers goalie was clearly better again not blaming Ellis but he needs to be better. I actually want them to make him their #1 and see what he can do. I edited my post to an A- because of the first goal Ersson let in. (Zucker) Ellis had a far more difficult job last night because of the greater number of dangerous chances he had to stop. Proof the NHL has different rules for the Sabres 1 Quote
Slack_in_MA Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, #freejame said: I don’t think it’s about jumping on the bandwagon. Speaking for myself, I want to enjoy Sabres hockey so much that I’ll tell myself they are something they’re not at the faintest glimpse of hope. I know I’m lying to myself, but I want to believe. I liken it to watching your kid play youth sports. You follow their every movement and see what you want to see because you want the best for them. Then they go up against “real” competition and you find out how good they really are. And it’s deflating. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 10 hours ago, Crusader1969 said: I'm glad you can admit the Flyers goalie was better If you look at the expected goals. Flyers were at 5.38 and got 5. So he was ok at best Sabres were at 5.72 and scored 2 The Flyers goalie was clearly better again not blaming Ellis but he needs to be better. I actually want them to make him their #1 and see what he can do. Let's not forget Ersson let in three goals last night but had the third overturned. He was beat by Benson moving across the crease. Before that he waves at a puck Byram scores on and let Zucker beat him five-hole on the power play. The rest of the night the Sabres hit him in the crest. Don't forget the goal Ellis allowed when a Flyer hit his blocker with his stick. No GI call because Buffalo. We seen to have different standards for goalies depending if they are Sabres or the opponent. Edited 1 hour ago by PromoTheRobot Quote
MISabresFan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Piss poor effort. Blaming it on puck luck. What BS, suck it up buttercup. This is the NHL not backyard ball. The puck does not have a brain and if you are lazy it will find you. 1 1 Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Man, that game was a gut punch. I thought we were different with Norris back. 1 Quote
French Collection Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 10 hours ago, SwampD said: That video coach isn’t blameless, either. That couple of minutes was a bad move and put the momentum on Philly’s side. The Sabres were done and played without the extra effort for most of the game. There needs to be a major house cleaning but TP probably still believes the answer is in the room. This forum has way better answers. 1 Quote
Scottysabres Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: Let's not forget Ersson let in three goals last night but had the third overturned. He was beat by Benson moving across the crease. Before that he waves at a puck Byram scores on and let Zucker beat him five-hole on the power play. The rest of the night the Sabres hit him in the crest. Don't forget the goal Ellis allowed when a Flyer hit his blocker with his stick. No GI call because Buffalo. We seen to have different standards for goalies depending if they are Sabres or the opponent. If the Sabres shooters could hit the broadside of a barn it could have easily been a 6 or 7 to 5 Sabres victory. At least 4 open nets were shot right in to the goalie or, worse, wide or high, a common trademark of Sabres shooters as of late. Edited 1 hour ago by Scottysabres 2 Quote
zow2 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Why is Ruff still the coach here? If they get fewer than 6 points on this road trip he should be fired upon arrival back in Buffalo. 1 Quote
Pimlach Posted 56 minutes ago Report Posted 56 minutes ago (edited) Interesting commentary. Pretty much everything went wrong and the Sabres once again failed to handle adversity. The best players did not step up once again. Thompson’s lazy effort on a PP leads to his hooking call that nullified the PP. Tuch’s failure to clear the puck on a PK leads to a goal. The failed challenge, and another goal. The coach not calling timeout to settle things down, then another goal off of a Benson-Thompson give away. 3 goals in 59 seconds is a BIG problem. After that it was dysfunctional. Missed opportunities, the goalie throws his stick, a power play that does not shoot. The Sabres finally score and then give up a goal immediately afterwards. Then the Benson goal comes off the board, for offside - Tochett shows Ruff how its done. Dahlin’s match penalty. Hell, Dunne couldn’t even convince Des Laueriers to fight. The team lacked cohesion and maturity last night. This road trip will either make ‘em or break ‘em. 22 minutes ago, zow2 said: Why is Ruff still the coach here? If they get fewer than 6 points on this road trip he should be fired upon arrival back in Buffalo. Terry knows him. Edited 46 minutes ago by Pimlach 1 Quote
Mustache of God Posted 30 minutes ago Report Posted 30 minutes ago 13 hours ago, LGR4GM said: Ellis has been bad I don't understand why he's still on the roster. He was a waiver claim as insurance if UPL was injured longer term. Keeping 3 goalies on the roster kills the morale of your goalies. There's a reason just about every other team in the league only carries 2. Just waive him at this point. It's not a wasted asset if you gave up nothing to get him. Quote
Taro T Posted 20 minutes ago Report Posted 20 minutes ago 54 minutes ago, JoeSchmoe said: Man, that game was a gut punch. I thought we were different with Norris back. Was wondering how much of the incredible play on Monday had been due to the overall team adrenaline from getting Norris back finally healthy after so long and how much of it was getting a true top 6 skater into the lineup. Hard to read too much into last night's game because of the way how that 2 minute or so streak of horrible decisions and a bit of bad puck luck torpedoed the night. But, though Norris did have a hand in the PP goal (didn't he get the 2nd assist on the Zucker goal?), his line didn't look special even before the wheels fell off and the Appert appears to be stronger than the Norris as the PP didn't do squat after they got that 1 PP goal and it was poor play by Thompson on the PP that started the ball rolling downhill. They moved the puck well on the PP that worked. They did a lot of standing around waiting for Dahlin or Byram to get the puck to Thompson or Norris for a 1 timer outside of that. Again, the Appert is strong with this crew. Tomorrow's game will be a better indication of what they'll really get with Norris in the lineup. Am wondering how long it takes before we see Ruff's revised original plan for how to deploy the lines with Norris in the lineup. (Aka Thompson and Norris each centering their own lines.) Quote
Believer Posted 14 minutes ago Report Posted 14 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Scottysabres said: If the Sabres shooters could hit the broadside of a barn it could have easily been a 6 or 7 to 5 Sabres victory. At least 4 open nets were shot right in to the goalie or, worse, wide or high, a common trademark of Sabres shooters as of late. Agree. Only a couple of our players have demonstrated they have quick hands, puck poise before shooting in close, and the eye to snipe. Makes you wonder what our scouts look for in prospects and what they work on in practice. Character doesn’t shoot the puck, and frankly I haven’t seen much character from our guys anyway. Quote
PASabreFan Posted 10 minutes ago Report Posted 10 minutes ago 1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said: I edited my post to an A- because of the first goal Ersson let in. (Zucker) Ellis had a far more difficult job last night because of the greater number of dangerous chances he had to stop. Proof the NHL has different rules for the Sabres Just gonna go by photos? Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted 6 minutes ago Report Posted 6 minutes ago 10 minutes ago, Taro T said: Was wondering how much of the incredible play on Monday had been due to the overall team adrenaline from getting Norris back finally healthy after so long and how much of it was getting a true top 6 skater into the lineup. Hard to read too much into last night's game because of the way how that 2 minute or so streak of horrible decisions and a bit of bad puck luck torpedoed the night. But, though Norris did have a hand in the PP goal (didn't he get the 2nd assist on the Zucker goal?), his line didn't look special even before the wheels fell off and the Appert appears to be stronger than the Norris as the PP didn't do squat after they got that 1 PP goal and it was poor play by Thompson on the PP that started the ball rolling downhill. They moved the puck well on the PP that worked. They did a lot of standing around waiting for Dahlin or Byram to get the puck to Thompson or Norris for a 1 timer outside of that. Again, the Appert is strong with this crew. Tomorrow's game will be a better indication of what they'll really get with Norris in the lineup. Am wondering how long it takes before we see Ruff's revised original plan for how to deploy the lines with Norris in the lineup. (Aka Thompson and Norris each centering their own lines.) I personally like Thompson at C. It shouldn't be this way, but I do feel he seems more engaged there. Send Östlund back to ROC and bring Rosen back up to play wing. Then move McLeod back to 3rd line C where he's better suited. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.