Turbo44 Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Believer said: Then again, UPL has one clean OT and 5 frame shoot out win. Ellis can’t say the same. Except for one 3 month period, UPL has proven to be a below replacement level goalie, not counting his last year in juniors. He’s not becoming the next ullmark Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: I'm thinking forward not creating crises. If you are a good GM you can't wait for the crisis, you have to think ahead about what is coming and what you need. You know there will be extra roster players very soon. You also see you just lost your D man for "an extended time" so if you want to compete seriously you make a move. You at least try and look for opportunities. I don't want to blow a season on any sort of if only they'd................ I am certain they are listening for offers on goalies right now. But they aren't going to fire sale them. Edited 13 hours ago by PromoTheRobot Quote
Turbo44 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: I am certain they are listening for offers on goalies right now. But they aren't going to fire sale them. Always worry about injuries but if you can trade UPL and one of Ellis or Lyon gets hurt, you call up Levi. If Ellis or Lyon fall off a cliff, you call up Levi. It’s not rocket science except for probably Adams 1 Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: Always worry about injuries but if you can trade UPL and one of Ellis or Lyon gets hurt, you call up Levi. If Ellis or Lyon fall off a cliff, you call up Levi. It’s not rocket science except for probably Adams It's a team effort. Fairburn calls it Kev-mo. 🤣 Quote
bob_sauve28 Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 8 hours ago, Doohickie said: St. Louis Blues have no choice but make a trade for a new goalie to save their season Yes, UPL to the Blues rescue! 🤣 1 Quote
... Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago I believe the window to get the best return and settle the goalie issue is open now while there are still players out with injuries. You waive UPL and he makes it through his value is virtually forever tarnished by that. It would take a long time and a consistent level of play UPL has barely managed once before to recover. GMKA needs to trade him now for whatevers and take what Adams would consider an ego punch, although, ironically, smart Sabres fans would actually appreciate the move. 2 Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, bob_sauve28 said: Yes, UPL to the Blues rescue! 🤣 What happened to the guy who blanked us, Joel Hofer? Turned back into a pumpkin? 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 4 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said: I am certain they are listening for offers on goalies right now. But they aren't going to fire sale them. I just don't want Adams to try to "win the trade". Just make the deal to make the team better now. 2 Quote
mjd1001 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: I just don't want Adams to try to "win the trade". Just make the deal to make the team better now. Agree. If they can trade UPL, I don't think 'waiting it out' to get the best offer is going to make much of a difference. I think his worth on the trade market is pretty low, and that isn't going to change. The value in moving him is not in the return you get, but in any potential cap space relief, just getting rid of one goalie when you have so many between Buffao and rochester, and not having to use an extra roster spot in Buffalo for 3 goalies. If you could Move UPL and get that cap space, an extra roster spot, room for the exisiting guys to play more, and a mid round draft pick...I might say that mid round pick is the least valuable to the team now. I want those other things 'yesterday', and If that isn't possible, give them to me no later than 'today'. Edited 3 hours ago by mjd1001 1 Quote
French Collection Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, mjd1001 said: Agree. If they can trade UPL, I don't think 'waiting it out' to get the best offer is going to make much of a difference. I think his worth on the trade market is pretty low, and that isn't going to change. The value in moving him is not in the return you get, but in any potential cap space relief, just getting rid of one goalie when you have so many between Buffao and rochester, and not having to use an extra roster spot in Buffalo for 3 goalies. If you could Move UPL and get that cap space, an extra roster spot, room for the exisiting guys to play more, and a mid round draft pick...I might say that mid round pick is the least valuable to the team now. I want those other things 'yesterday', and If that isn't possible, give them to me no later than 'today'. I think another plus is the intangible effect he has on his teammates when he is in the net. I think he brings Eeyore vibes to the team. I agree that you move him ASAP. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: I just don't want Adams to try to "win the trade". Just make the deal to make the team better now. So you want him to get taken to the cleaners? So you can complain about what a bad trade he made? Quote
mjd1001 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: So you want him to get taken to the cleaners? So you can complain about what a bad trade he made? As per my post above, I just want him off the team. Is there a chance he could find his game and turn into a good goalie for someone else? Sure. There's also a chance that never happens. And right now I think the team benefits going forward having one less goaltender on it, that being UPL. If you give him away with no return at all except having an extra roster spot, I'm okay with it. I wouldn't consider that being taken to the cleaners. Not moving him, having him play games where he's below average, having three goaltenders on the roster, paying him the couple percent of cap space that you're paying him..... Everyday that continues, I consider that being taken to the cleaners. Quote
Archie Lee Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said: So you want him to get taken to the cleaners? So you can complain about what a bad trade he made? I've been a UPL supporter, but even I don't think it is possible to be "taken to the cleaners" on a UPL trade right now. The combination of his play over the past 12 months and his contract mean if you could move him for future considerations you are getting out of what currently looks like a bad contract. Of course, UPL could find his game on another team with a better coaching staff and D structure. Samuelsson's contract looked bad 2 months ago. Edited 1 hour ago by Archie Lee 2 Quote
Archie Lee Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 56 minutes ago, mjd1001 said: As per my post above, I just want him off the team. Is there a chance he could find his game and turn into a good goalie for someone else? Sure. There's also a chance that never happens. And right now I think the team benefits going forward having one less goaltender on it, that being UPL. If you give him away with no return at all except having an extra roster spot, I'm okay with it. I wouldn't consider that being taken to the cleaners. Not moving him, having him play games where he's below average, having three goaltenders on the roster, paying him the couple percent of cap space that you're paying him..... Everyday that continues, I consider that being taken to the cleaners. I largely agree. But, the Sabres could also get a head coach and staff that do a better job of putting their players in a position to be successful. 1 Quote
inkman Posted 56 minutes ago Report Posted 56 minutes ago 36 minutes ago, Archie Lee said: I've been a UPL supporter, but even I don't think it is possible to be "taken to the cleaners" on a UPL trade right now. The combination of his play over the past 12 months and his contract mean if you could move him for future considerations you are getting out of what currently looks like a bad contract. Of course, UPL could find his game on another team with a better coaching staff and D structure. Samuelsson's contract looked bad 2 months ago. I still don’t think Samuelsson or Greenway’s contract are “bad”. Are they ideal? No. Is it essentially what an average NHL forward or dman make commensurate with their play. Pretty much. Sure you could replace those guys with cheaper versions but until the cap becomes a constraint, I’m not worried. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted 30 minutes ago Report Posted 30 minutes ago 13 hours ago, Turbo44 said: Played the last 2 games, will play again cs Calgary tomorrow and we have 2 other goalies who need work. Pretty obvious Perhaps only to the most brilliant hockey minds that deign to visit this message board. Quote
kas23 Posted 20 minutes ago Report Posted 20 minutes ago 2 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said: So you want him to get taken to the cleaners? So you can complain about what a bad trade he made? Taken to the cleaners for UPL? I think most on here would be satisfied with “future considerations” to get that contract off the books. Terry would be even happier. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.