Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Weave said:

Inky, tell me more about these two.

Tischke is a former bottom of the roster D that is more than a willing combatant.  Kuntar is obviously former Sabres goalie coach Les Kuntar’s kid.  Haven’t seen him play much but his PIMs are rather high.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, inkman said:

Tischke is a former bottom of the roster D that is more than a willing combatant.  Kuntar is obviously former Sabres goalie coach Les Kuntar’s kid.  Haven’t seen him play much but his PIMs are rather high.  

Well, an overall entertaining Amerks squad might just get me out to a few games.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

While I'm not deep into the details of the Amerks' roster, I believe that their last two playoff exits were to teams that were bigger, stronger, tougher, and older, but perhaps less skilled.  Adding some tenacity and muscle doesn't sound like a bad idea.  Same applies to the parent club, except that in order to have a "playoff exit" you must first have a "playoff appearance."

Posted
7 minutes ago, inkman said:

Tischke is a former bottom of the roster D that is more than a willing combatant.  Kuntar is obviously former Sabres goalie coach Les Kuntar’s kid.  Haven’t seen him play much but his PIMs are rather high.  

Oh you Rochester watchers are going to love Kuntar. He's a tempest in a teapot and gets in everybody's face. Bruins fans were wishing he'd become a new s##t disturber for them but he didn't show the skills required for the NHL. He's an AHL guy but the kind of guy Rochester could use big time to go with their skill guys. 

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, PerreaultForever said:

Oh you Rochester watchers are going to love Kuntar. He's a tempest in a teapot and gets in everybody's face. Bruins fans were wishing he'd become a new s##t disturber for them but he didn't show the skills required for the NHL. He's an AHL guy but the kind of guy Rochester could use big time to go with their skill guys. 

Shocked 30 Rock GIF

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, msw2112 said:

While I'm not deep into the details of the Amerks' roster, I believe that their last two playoff exits were to teams that were bigger, stronger, tougher, and older, but perhaps less skilled.  Adding some tenacity and muscle doesn't sound like a bad idea.  Same applies to the parent club, except that in order to have a "playoff exit" you must first have a "playoff appearance."

This is correct. Why the ***** didn’t Kevyn do the same for the Sabres?  

Posted
1 hour ago, Weave said:

Well, an overall entertaining Amerks squad might just get me out to a few games.

We haven't done an Amerks trip in quite a while.

Posted
1 hour ago, msw2112 said:

While I'm not deep into the details of the Amerks' roster, I believe that their last two playoff exits were to teams that were bigger, stronger, tougher, and older, but perhaps less skilled.  Adding some tenacity and muscle doesn't sound like a bad idea.  Same applies to the parent club, except that in order to have a "playoff exit" you must first have a "playoff appearance."

What do these words mean? I don't think that's a real thing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...