Doohickie

He was.... is he addicted to the stuff or what?

The mentioned the chicken parm several times; felt they were overdoing it. Does no other city serve chicken parm?

Simple math: 6-on-5 (end of game with goalie pulled): 1.2 times the manpower 5-on-4: 1.25 times the manpower 4-on-3: 1.33 times the panpower 3-on-2: 1.5 times the manpower (doesn't happen in the NHL but just to show the trend) 2-on-1: 2 times the manpower (ditto)

I disagree with the justification, but basically they said because Benson went into the crease voluntarily, but then was constrained there by the defender, the fact that he went in on his own is why it was called. Watching the replay it looks like he was in the top of the crease but then actually got his feet out of the crease before the puck went in. Ummm.... I dunno. I thought it was a good goal. I'm trying not to look back. That's the best I can do.

Oh, different player for sure. But fills a similar role. Given a choice I'm not sure who I pick. Would I want Mitts back and not have Byram? Or is the team better overall with Byram and McLeod? .... .... ....maybe? Small-ish sample size.

I said earlier that McLeod is our Mitts now. Hangs out on the 3rd line, can elevate to the 1st line if needed.

"Are you talking to *me*?"

Coaching matters.

As much as I love Tage as a player, there's no way he makes the pass McLeod just made.

Are you ***** kidding me????

Can't be interference if Benson was pushed into the goalie.

They look good. Horrible turnover led to StL goal.

Sabres on pace for (does the math) 48 shots on goal. I wanna say I'm getting a mancrush on Benson but he's less than a third of my age so...

Peterka's got that dawg in 'im. I'll tell you what that Benson is a player right there you betcha

Beaut of a save by Levi.

The Sabres have more jump after scoring the goal.

OMG SHUT THOSE DAMNED FLAGS OFF DURING THE POWERPLAY!

You're not wrong...

Byram has some wheels I'll tell you what