JujuFish

It's $7.41 million after 3 years. If released before 6/1 of that year, it would be a $7.410 million hit in 2025. If released on or after 6/1, it becomes a $3.705 million hit in 2025 and 2026.

I think this is how it breaks down: He will receive $19.97 million in actual cash for '22, which is $1.12 million base salary + $18.525 million signing bonus + $225k roster bonus + $100k workout bonus. It looks like the signing bonus gets amortized five years, which is where the discrepancy comes into play. So $18.525 million / 5 gets counted against the '22 cap. That makes the cap hit $1.12 million base salary + $3.705 million + $225k roster bonus + $100k workout bonus which equals $5.15 million.

Duke Johnson was mentioned a page back. Greg Mancz is a guy with 9 starts in the last 4 years, clearly a depth signing.

Anyone watching Severance on AppleTV? I'm enjoying it quite a bit.

I hope the Browns go 0-16.

I also think he can still play. I think it's a combo of his salary and declining play. If his cap hit for the upcoming season had been, say, $3 million instead of $7.6 million, I bet he's still on the team.

In his three seasons with us, he's had: 4.9 > 4.3 > 3.7. There's a clear trend there. And his yards before catch also dropped this season: 6.7 > 7.5 > 4.7, and his average depth of target went 8.0 > 7.8 > 5.6. And one of Beane's first comments after the season was that he wanted players who can get yards after the catch, with the images of Hill's huge TD against us presumably on his mind.

Beasley was too expensive and his performance was dropping. His YAC plummeted this year, presumably because he's losing a step.

I'm looking at it and I don't see what you're seeing (or I'm misunderstanding what you're saying). Do you mean there is little to no penalty to end the contract after three years? Because if he's under contract, there is most definitely a cap hit.

That doesn't make any sense to me. Proof? And 33 this month means he'll be almost 39 at the end of the contract.

So we signed Von Miller until he's 38? On the one hand, I love having a beast pass rusher, but on the other, that seems a bit crazy for length.

Totally off topic, but I love Levain Bakery's chocolate chip cookies (NYC chain).

Denver is a good team everywhere except the QB position, so I'm not sure how you can decide they screwed this up. Whether or not it's enough is a different question, but it's a little silly to consider it a bad move.

He is definitely #2.

Oh good, just what I always wanted. Yet another highly talented QB in the conference. At least it wasn't Miami.

I saw one person notice how billionaires are perfectly willing to pony up billions for the highly appreciable asset (i.e. the team), but make the public pay for the assets that they need but will only deteriorate over time (e.g. the stadium). So true (to my layman eyes, anyway) and so frustrating.

I'd run it by Tre White first, considering the dirty hit Gronk laid on him a few years ago. If Tre is OK with it, then I'd be OK with it.

I'm a millennial that watched the game via an antenna pointed at a tower about 36 miles away. I picked up the antenna just to see if I could get NBC for the Super Bowl, actually. Sports are the only thing I watch live and I kind of hate the small lag (~a minute) there is between watching via antenna and streaming online.

That's weird, since I've recently learned on this very board that Knox can't catch a ball and we should probably just cut him before he goes down as the worst TE in Bills history.

Mainly just that Knox hasn't been "really, really bad" this season. So I'm comparing him to the best person not named Josh on the offense.

Diggs has a lower catch % (62.8 to 69.0), yards per catch (11.9 to 12.0), yards per target (7.5 to 8.3),TDs per target (.061 to .127), and more fumbles (1 to 0) than Knox.

For the record, I would have wholeheartedly agreed with you before this year. He took a big step forward this season, and was considerably more consistent. Last year, he'd made incredibly difficult catches and drop the easy ones. I'd say your comment of "really, really bad" tells me you have an emotional investment in this, for some reason, because I don't think that's the case at all this year.

You're not proving any point. Knox is credited with 4 drops this season. Diggs has more.

So you look at a *single* game and try to generalize from it? Are you sure you're not trolling right now? Let's look at his previous game: 5 catches for 89 yards and 2 TDs. Or how about the previous playoff game before that, our loss last year to KC: 6 catches for 42 yards and a TD.

Based on what evidence?