JujuFish

I'm looking at it and I don't see what you're seeing (or I'm misunderstanding what you're saying). Do you mean there is little to no penalty to end the contract after three years? Because if he's under contract, there is most definitely a cap hit.

That doesn't make any sense to me. Proof? And 33 this month means he'll be almost 39 at the end of the contract.

So we signed Von Miller until he's 38? On the one hand, I love having a beast pass rusher, but on the other, that seems a bit crazy for length.

Totally off topic, but I love Levain Bakery's chocolate chip cookies (NYC chain).

Denver is a good team everywhere except the QB position, so I'm not sure how you can decide they screwed this up. Whether or not it's enough is a different question, but it's a little silly to consider it a bad move.

He is definitely #2.

Oh good, just what I always wanted. Yet another highly talented QB in the conference. At least it wasn't Miami.

I saw one person notice how billionaires are perfectly willing to pony up billions for the highly appreciable asset (i.e. the team), but make the public pay for the assets that they need but will only deteriorate over time (e.g. the stadium). So true (to my layman eyes, anyway) and so frustrating.

I'd run it by Tre White first, considering the dirty hit Gronk laid on him a few years ago. If Tre is OK with it, then I'd be OK with it.

I'm a millennial that watched the game via an antenna pointed at a tower about 36 miles away. I picked up the antenna just to see if I could get NBC for the Super Bowl, actually. Sports are the only thing I watch live and I kind of hate the small lag (~a minute) there is between watching via antenna and streaming online.

That's weird, since I've recently learned on this very board that Knox can't catch a ball and we should probably just cut him before he goes down as the worst TE in Bills history.

Mainly just that Knox hasn't been "really, really bad" this season. So I'm comparing him to the best person not named Josh on the offense.

Diggs has a lower catch % (62.8 to 69.0), yards per catch (11.9 to 12.0), yards per target (7.5 to 8.3),TDs per target (.061 to .127), and more fumbles (1 to 0) than Knox.

For the record, I would have wholeheartedly agreed with you before this year. He took a big step forward this season, and was considerably more consistent. Last year, he'd made incredibly difficult catches and drop the easy ones. I'd say your comment of "really, really bad" tells me you have an emotional investment in this, for some reason, because I don't think that's the case at all this year.

You're not proving any point. Knox is credited with 4 drops this season. Diggs has more.

So you look at a *single* game and try to generalize from it? Are you sure you're not trolling right now? Let's look at his previous game: 5 catches for 89 yards and 2 TDs. Or how about the previous playoff game before that, our loss last year to KC: 6 catches for 42 yards and a TD.

Based on what evidence?

Congrats to Nadal for 21. Thanks to the absence of the two men responsible for 10 of the previous 11 championships, Nadal was able to seize the opportunity and complete his second career grand slam

Only one of these things is true. Then we're agreeing with each other.

No, he was 8th. And seriously, stop conflating the fact that Allen does not have elite accuracy with Allen not being elite. And the Bills were 19th in dropped passes last year.

Sigh. I already addressed this with on-target percentage. Still 24th in the league this year. Josh does not have and has never had elite accuracy. He is elite in other areas of his game, but it absolutely boggles my mind that you are arguing against this objectively true point.

How about on target percentage? 24th there, too. "I don't like numbers because they don't agree with me."

Oh give me a break. Back your argument up with stats, then.

FFS, pay attention. We're talking about his accuracy. It's 24th in the league. That is not elite. It simply isn't.

24th in completion percentage, Do you consider that elite?