JujuFish

Well, thank you for outing yourself as someone not worth interacting with.

You might want to re-read what was written, because (1) Scotty said survive the season without serious injuries and (2) Scotty agrees with your sentiment about the Bills still being good. Don't let your rage (toward people who are critical of the Bills) blind you.

Douglas is not better than pre-injury Tre. Post-injury, sure. Wait, I just realized we're probably talking about two different injuries.

If the NFL could decide who Buffalo picks, surely they would want AD Mitchell. That way, we can have this constant storyline of whether the Chiefs or Bills drafted the better Texas WR, especially after the trade.

I've seen this take a lot from Bills fans, and there is absolutely zero logic in it. If the Bills weren't going to draft Worthy, then the Chiefs were going to get him regardless. It doesn't matter at all whether Worthy is a star, a bust, or somewhere in between.

I'm not familiar with this concept

It's the 4th round compensatory pick for Edmunds that should have been a 3rd round pick to begin with.

Late to the party, but to answer the title: anyone who has told the Saudis to shove it.

8-2 starts and leading the league in run differential? Didn't expect that start for Cleveland. I will enjoy it while it lasts.

Sheffield

Went with a couple of friends to their friend's house in northern VT. Turns out the guy is a Rochester native, which was fun. The weather was great. Traffic coming back was horrible. I'm glad I made the trip.

The Bills have drafted 3 WRs (Moulds, Evans, Watkins) in the first round in the last 40+ years. Beane alone has drafted 3 front seven players (Edmunds, Oliver, Rousseau) in the first round. I am not following the comparison.

You could teach a masterclass in how to show off one's insecurity.

Restructuring with Buffalo wouldn't have changed his cap hit after moving him to Houston. That hit is the amount of money Buffalo had already paid Diggs that hadn't yet been counted against their salary cap (signing bonuses which get spread throughout the length of the contract).

With only a 6th round pick involved in this year's draft, I do wonder why they didn't wait until after the draft to pull the trigger. Now it seems like an inevitability that they'll be going WR with their first pick. I wonder how that affects teams' drafting strategies.

Well damn. Diggs, I'm going to miss your passion. I wish you had gone to the NFC so I could cheer you a little better. Good luck out there.

I hope Ohtani is clean. He is one of the greatest players baseball has ever seen, and I'm sure a hero to many Japanese kids (and others, of course).

Is the idea that it's safer because there is less room to reach full speed? Is that increase in safety enough to counter the decrease in safety caused by an increased number of returns?

I picked up a $2 ticket to see it Tuesday (Fandango has a $5 off code (FROZENGHOST)). For that price, I'll give it plenty of leeway.

I'm with your wife on this one, but I will readily admit that watching in IMAX versus watching at home (like I did for part 1) influences this.

Looking forward to this. Living near Boston, I have to drive a few hours to be in position, but there won't be another chance to see totality anywhere near here until 2079.

I'll add another complaint (though not relevant to a written medium like this forum). It really rubs me the wrong way when I hear someone pronounce the plurals of bias and process with an -eez ending. Lots of words do get plurals like this: ellipsis, diagnosis, parenthesis, genesis, catharthis, metamorphosis, psychosis, synopsis, and many more. But these are all -sis words of Greek origin, which isn't the case for bias or process. This is something I mainly hear from otherwise well-educated people, which makes it baffling to me. It's like some form of pattern recognition gone wrong.

I don't particularly enjoy 'whom' being misused. 'Who' is perfectly acceptable these days in all but the most formal of occasions.

Even more specifically, it was only the plural objective case (back when we used to decline more pronouns than I/me and we/us). The subjective form was 'ye' for plural, 'thee' for singular.

https://youtu.be/om7O0MFkmpw