Jump to content

K-9

Members
  • Posts

    10,861
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by K-9

  1. It all comes down to competing interests. There is no need to label anyone.
  2. Interesting rhetoric indeed. While others are wrapped up in the distraction of semantics, let's get down to the crux of the issue: tax dollars. The government provides numerous socialist programs with our tax dollars and has since it first started collecting them. The money for other programs is already there. The issue is one of allocation and the debate it engenders. Here's my own contribution to the rhetoric wheel: those corporations that suck at the public tit are well entrenched on K street and resent the very thought of that public money going anywhere else and they have no compunction whatsoever when it comes to demonizing other social programs that threaten.
  3. I think this is a fair observation given his level of anger immediately after the game was over. I think he was pissed off from the moment the ref called a penalty on Risto. GO SABRES!!!
  4. I wouldn't have guessed Gartner.
  5. We'll give you a waiver on those.
  6. I tend to agree with this. Between Ennis and Moulson, that's 40+ goals we were banking on this season. Who knows how many more points in the standings that production would have meant. GO SABRES!!!
  7. K-9

    Tank 3.0

    ^This. I would add learning to live with each other, too. Perhaps that's the most important aspect we are describing. Tightly-knit lockerrooms aren't forged overnight. It's a process and it takes time. GO SABRES!!!
  8. He is not partying like a rock star and putting up those kinds of numbers in a pro league. One just doesn't lend itself to the other. Why the character assassination of an 18 year old kid? Not a good optic here. Full of red flags.
  9. You had me at "spoons with a Brady fathead." Great stuff. As to the game, we need ROR to return to form and I think he does tonight. GO SABRES!!!
  10. The " ask for it" mentality applies because the implication is that if Shelby were wearing different clothes (as you suggested in a previous post), she wouldn't be the subject of salacious photos snapped by a patron and posted on the web. Feminists believe clothing shouldn't matter at all, regardless. That was the only point I was arguing. I will leave it up to you and others to argue the rest of it.
  11. Why she wears any particular clothing is beside the point to feminists. That was the only aspect of your post I was responding to. I don't want to get bogged down in your "she was asking for it" mentality. It is simply not germane to the issue. Precisely. According to feminist ideology, the clothing a women wears or whether she wears anything at all, should not make her eligible for objectification.
  12. That's the point. Your previous post suggested that if Shelby were a feminist she would be wearing different clothes, as if feminists would be wearing burqas. Feminists believe a woman should be able to tend bar naked without having to be subjected to objectification.
  13. Nice. The kid has waited a long time. I hope he plays on the Eichel/Girgs line because he can at least keep up with them. That said, I expect DD to limit him the the 4th line. GO SABRES!!!
  14. Allegations of sexual abuse or rape made by someone with compromised credibility regarding that charge really hurt legitimate complaints. Presumption of innocence is always paramount but Ashe Schow seems to imply that presumption of money grabbing gold diggers should come first.
  15. Please point to where I agree with Bylsma. That's right, you can't. I also said that Bylsma may be basing his decision on what he observes in practice. In the meantime,please acquaint yourself with the term "devil's advocate" and get the phuck out of my face, GO SABRES!!!
  16. Not saying he is right, just that he may have his reasons based on observations in practice, ergo devil's advocate. And IIRC, Jack looked feeble on his SO attempt, too. GO SABRES!!!
  17. I'll play devil's advocate and suggest DD may be reluctant to use Eichel and Reinhart in the shootouts because he has observed in practice that they just aren't very good at it and doesn't want to give them that pressure as a result. GO SABRES!!!
  18. Johnson is the Fitzpatrick of Buffalo goaltenders. You just know at some time he's gonna whiff and break your heart. Nice goal by the rat, though. Gotta tip your hat. GO SABRES!!!
  19. That's a question better asked of Brent Rossi.
  20. Mob mentality is an interesting psychological phenomenon. GO SABRES!!!
  21. In that context, his point production is pretty damned impressive. GO SABRES!!!
  22. Our equipment managers are the best. For them to go back to the room and come out with helmet decals for those two guys is awesome. GO SABRES!!!
  23. My favorite kind of shameless self-promotion! Your son is a lucky boy and vice-versa. I look forward to that tower toppling over from too much weight!
  24. I suspect you are correct about us having one or two guys who can do it consistently. My belief is that no team does one or the other exclusively and for obvious reasons. GO SABRES!!!
  25. OK, now THAT was funny. You are still delusional and paranoid, but that was comic gold, Jerry!
×
×
  • Create New...