shrader

Yeah, you don’t like me, I get it. But anyway, I come here to read about this trade and instead I get the same three or four posters rapid fire bitching. This place used to be be a great source of information no but unfortunately it has become a steaming pile. Be proud.

You know how they say a room full of women will eventually have their cycles sync up? I imagine that’s a lot like this board tonight.

Can you cancel your account here while you’re at it? You’re not happy, we get it.

Is he the one who was going to sign in Dallas a few years ago but then stabbed them in the back last second?

You’d have to imagine that they had a conversation or two prior to making the trade.

If the players already have a contract in place with the CHL team, that is the reason why an agreement even exists between the two leagues. It’s the same reason there are transfer agreements with the European leagues. There needs to be some set standard on how they are able to essentially break the already existing deal that the player has.

There’s no room for him at this point. He’s not going to sign anywhere just to be thrown in the ECHL. At this stage, Rochester needs someone with more experience.

They’re not rumors if you just throw the names out there yourself

Vaseline? That guy needs to be paired up with Pekar

You speak out often about the mega threads. Politics is a pretty broad label. That’s a lot of topics to be confined to a single thread. I’d lean more towards a sub forum if possible, that way you can have multiple threads, but those who want to avoid it don’t have to see every single one of them on the front page. Maybe the software doesn’t allow for that, but it’s the way I would do it if I would stupidly put in charge.

I’m pretty sure his new contract is an AHL only deal.

He can’t be very good though if he can only go for about 30 seconds each time.

So Tavares shot you down and it’s time to move on to someone else?

Because of Fox?

It’s funny when you see that people clearly didn’t read the thread. Anyway, so with those clubs, is it essentially the person who starts the group that winds up as the so called moderator? If it’s closed, someone has to have the power to let someone in.

Whatever it is, it should definitely not be pinned. Those are the first thing you see when you get here. Not a good approach when many want to avoid it.

I haven’t seen that function before. I’m about as basic with these boards as possible. Do they use it much over there?

I’d go with the PPP model. Keep it isolated to where you knowingly have to navigate over to it.

Nevermind?

Why on earth would you use his first name to make a nickname?

It's little kid hockey. I'm amazed there isn't a hit every 3 seconds in such confined spaces.

I would gladly take excessive turn signal use if it got rid of the people who never use them.

Interesting, I've never seen it setup that way. I bet people still find a way to screw it up. Stupidity always wins out in the end.

The way they report these has gotten very sloppy. It should just be labeled as "a conditional 2019 draft pick". Under one set of conditions it is a 3rd, under the other it is a 4th. I'm not sure exactly when it changed, but they never used to include the round the way they do now by saying "conditional 3rd round draft pick". This again is a product of the twitter world we live in. They are trying to give as much information as they can while dealing with a character limit. They used to say conditional pick and then follow that up by explaining the conditions.

This should be good