All Activity
- Past hour
-
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
Gatorman0519 replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
The Calgary feed is shredding the ineptitude of that Sabres power play. -
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
Pimlach replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
Good evening Teammates, my immediate impression is those Calgary Uni’s are dog $hit. -
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
JohninMinn. replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
I think Tuch is playing retired hockey. -
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
#freejame replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
Can’t wait to watch what the $4M Greenman does on the top line. -
A good GM could have got him here. He was a kid when that incident took place. It could have been worked out.
-
GDT: Sabres @ Jets, December 5, 2025 @ 7PM on MSG, TSN, ESPN+
Spoonman replied to SABRES 0311's topic in The Aud Club
I will blame Kevyn for whatever I want! # F Facts! 🤣 -
I never heard of it either. Reading the Wiki synopsis, it sounds like a Coen Brothers film.
-
Not sure if this has been fine tuned since then (I should probably find out), but here's what it says on the Moneypuck website. https://moneypuck.com/about.htm
-
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
_Q_ replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
6-7 Sabres? -
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
Stads replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
I was going to go with QVC. I'm in the market for some decorative Christmas tins -
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
Doohickie replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
Or Monday Night Football.... eh, not with Troy... he's such a tool. -
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
Doohickie replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
And really... it's hinting. It's only blatant to the Kevyn haters. -
It sounds like the colts were disappointed when they realized Johnny Unitas wasn’t available for a workout.
-
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
Doohickie replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
That's hardly "throwing shade." I think everything he said is pretty objectively accurate. -
For me the question is simple. Do you want to pay Tuch $11 million a year when he's turning 30 in May, and this season has been a mixed bag for him? Keeping in mind if they signed him, this would impact signing our younger players like Benson. If he's firm on $11 million, I would absolutely trade him for what I can get.
-
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
JohnC replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
If KA is elevated to a position with a loftier title without much authority, then I would be fine with that. He can have whatever title he wants as long as another GM is the one authorized to make the hockey decisions. Will that be the case in this weird Pegula organization? I don't know. -
We moved the ball all day long, didn’t punt, and shot ourselves in the foot more than anything the Bengals D did. And the fact that they were 10 points up at one point is a reflection of their ability to move against our defense and had nothing to do with what our offense was doing. I will agree to disagree with the rest of it.
-
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
LGR4GM replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
Taking out your testicular cancer just to put it into your head, seems counter productive. - Today
-
GDT: Sabres @ Flames, Dec 8, 2025, 9pm. WGR, MSG, ESPN+(out of market)
JohnC replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
I wouldn't be bothered if KA was promoted to the POHO position. The issue then becomes is he still making the hockey decisions or would the next GM be making the personnel decisions. The issue isn't what position he has as it is how empowered is he. -
I'd take Greentree.
-
That's the thing I keep asking: who decides what's low danger, high danger or an expected goal? Just because something is based on "years of data" doesn't answer the question. It is. Many times. You just don't notice.
-
That's not what's happening.
