All Activity

Here's how I see it. Every goalie we bring in starts well but regresses to an inadequate performance level. When these things keep happening I ask why? Is it just a coincidence that every goalie the Sabres sign is equally bad? Or is it the way we play the game in front of them wears them out eventually? We'll never know for sure, unless you put 100% faith in stats. From what I see the bad goaltending starts in front of the goalie, all the way to the opposing blue line. All 5 skaters are sloppy, they don't know how to handle a puck, they skate themselves into trouble, and all opposing teams need to do is wait for us to cough up the puck and they're off to the races. Night after night after night it's like this. Now think back to the Winnipeg game in Buffalo. The Jets came in flat and the Sabres played a near flawless game. UPL gives up one goal. One breakaway, few if any turnovers at the blue line, and the ones that happened, skaters got back and erased the mistake. When the Sabres play like that, suddenly goaltending looks pretty good. When you watch other games, you simply do not see the level of sloppiness you see in this team. So go ahead and say this goalie or that one isn't good enough, and spew all the advanced analytics you want. I know what I see and you will NEVER find that mythical goalie we all dream of because no goalie stands a chance playing behind the Sabres.

I would look at a Liam Greentree from LA, Samoskevich from Florida as mentioned, or Utah which is has picks and prospects

miss Rick, too. keep me updated on your cat

If there is a more colorful Sabrespace poster, I’ve never read them. And garlic powder is perfectly suitable in a dry spice blend.

Truly. I mean, it was probably better for the Bills if they'd won, but I don't care. I want to see them crash and burn.

Now, now, now, Kevyn....

What'd he say?

Just saw Ruff’s answer about Östlund going back to Rochester. That makes twice in the past week he’s quietly thrown shade at Adams and the rest of management.

Meh Whatever

Coaching staff, August 2011 Yes, there was that initial new owner spike and standings surge when it was just good vibes and a rebuilt Regier/Ruff team rising from the ashes of 2007 --- yes, only dramatic charges to 8th and 9th. But now they could drill wells. And then Pegula started making decisions. But also during that summer his apprentice came aboard.

I knew you would like that. And benchmark, don't forget benchmark. 91 points is the standard of excellence that Adams brought to us.

I'd much rather have them trade him and get a big return out of it...but I don't think the return on a trade matters as much anymore. If this team has a GOOD GM/Front office eventually, the $10m in cap space you will have by him not being here is likely to be more valuable than a mid-to-late 1st round pick (and what that may become in 3-4 years) and a mid-level prospect.

If the country cared about and paid more attention to the NHL, "Pegula" would be a verb right now.... When a new owner buys a team, the local media and fanbase can say "Just don't Pegula things up" When an owner makes big time changes, hires an uknown coach or GM (stuff like that) and not everyone agree with them "He's going to Pegula the franchise up" Alas, the majority of the USA doesn't know the Pegula chapter of the Sabres story for that to likely catch on.

So if the glass is half-full then we have 14 more years to go?

And yet every single day that passes brings them that much closer to their next playoff berth. (Glass halffull indeed.)

He may have bought the team in Feb 2011, but the team from Feb 2011 to the end of the season really wan't "his" team. If was in the offseason he started to take control in a way that impacted the team, roster, and front office. That basically will line up with the peak of that graph. It was very VERY close to the start of the downfall the moment Pegula started to 'exercise' his power as owner.

Pegulian just sounds right.

My above post was intended to be sarcastic. I think that when the Rigas corruption scandal and the NHL take over that was the original lowest point. The Golisano era revived things and the Pegula era pumped everyone up for a very short time. In Pegulian times the abrupt leaving of LaFontaine started a downward trend that reached a new low when they tanked and failed to win the lottery twice. New lows were achieved when ROR was dealt away for hating to lose, and then again when Eichel was dealt for away under the EEE plan. New lows have been then norm since the Adams Benchmark 91 point season. Since we are setting NHL records and I guess you can just say that each playoff miss adds is the new lowest point.

Some in the Houston game were from immediate pressure. Anderson abused a 1 armed Spencer Brown like a rented mule

Needs to be a tshirt and worn by everyone attending a Sabres home game

It should be colour coded. It took him not even half a season to make his mark. Buys the team in Feb 2011, they fall off a cliff from Oct 2011 to today

I dunno. I thought of you when he said it.

By the way, I had to work 7 hrs today to make 40 for the week, I was scheduled for tue., wed., thur. 7pm to 7am, only, the company pays 11 instead of 12 for shifty’s, something I’m told will be corrected after the 1st of the year, long story unto itself there but trust me when I tell you it’s not a win. Anyways, I had the company town hall today which they’ve turned in to a training session. And like The Fat Electrician always says, that inner smart arse all us vets have in ourselves came out. They did a D.E.I. Questionnaire, my table nominated me as the spokesman. I stated I work with a Swede, 2 Mexicans and a Philipino and we do a dam fine job in the E&I dept. Everyone laughed, the plant manager was writing notes, I expect a meeting when I return from vacation next Monday 😂

It won't. what are the odds he even knows they are playing tonight?? And if he does know they play tonight, does he care?

Do you know what Temu is?