Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Taro T said:

There is ALWAYS a spot for another top 6 winger.  It might be on the 3rd line, but that is a 1st World problem that would be a very nice problem to have.

You also have to give something to get something. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, shrader said:

You also have to give something to get something. 

Yes.  But the Sabres don't ALWAYS have to be the team giving up the best player.  What's the point of having too friggin' many prospects to ever have them all in the lineup if you aren't willing to use some of them as the proverbial sweeteners to actually be the team giving up quantity for quality.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Taro T said:

Yes.  But the Sabres don't ALWAYS have to be the team giving up the best player.  What's the point of having too friggin' many prospects to ever have them all in the lineup if you aren't willing to use some of them as the proverbial sweeteners to actually be the team giving up quantity for quality.

So a player I’ve been thinking about is Kulich.  He’s a center, right?  And he’s not really a bottom 6 type of center.  If we go and get a 2C then what are we going to do with Kulich?  He’s not a 4th line guy.  Do we send him back to Rochester?  
i think he’s possibly going to be a big piece going out in a trade because there’s not really a place for him.  

  • dislike 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Taro T said:

Yes.  But the Sabres don't ALWAYS have to be the team giving up the best player.  What's the point of having too friggin' many prospects to ever have them all in the lineup if you aren't willing to use some of them as the proverbial sweeteners to actually be the team giving up quantity for quality.

If a move of Peterka leads to a top 6 forward or a #2 center, are they really giving up the best player though?

Posted
46 minutes ago, Mr. Allen said:

So a player I’ve been thinking about is Kulich.  He’s a center, right?  And he’s not really a bottom 6 type of center.  If we go and get a 2C then what are we going to do with Kulich?  He’s not a 4th line guy.  Do we send him back to Rochester?  
i think he’s possibly going to be a big piece going out in a trade because there’s not really a place for him.  

Fair but kulich can play wing too

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...