Jump to content

Will Byslma be the HC Next Year?


WildCard

  

60 members have voted

  1. 1. Will DD Be the HC Next Season?

    • Yes
      25
    • No
      16
    • Yes, but he won't make it through the year
      16


Recommended Posts

The only way he isn't is if we have a 4-5 game stretch like the games in Brooklyn. Which is possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I still want him gone today. 

 

Struggling to start the season next year, unless we make the playoffs this year, will end his time here.

Winning and not being historically bad at offense will let him stay as long as he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way he isn't is if we have a 4-5 game stretch like the games in Brooklyn. Which is possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

 

I still want him gone today. 

 

Struggling to start the season next year, unless we make the playoffs this year, will end his time here.

 

Winning and not being historically bad at offense will let him stay as long as he wants.

I will quibble with the last line, because you have not defined what winning means. I think if we could see into the deep recesses of GMTM's brain, past the bathtubs full of poutine and the chubby ref anime, we'd see a plan to get rid of Bylsma once the Sabres reached a certain threshold of contendability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will quibble with the last line, because you have not defined what winning means. I think if we could see into the deep recesses of GMTM's brain, past the bathtubs full of poutine and the chubby ref anime, we'd see a plan to get rid of Bylsma once the Sabres reached a certain threshold of contendability.

Being a 2-3 seed in the Atlantic division next season and then a division winner ECF team the season after? I'm not sure. 

 

I do think that Bylsma was always going to be the guy that got fired mid-season for our Mike Sullivan. Or Dan Bylsma.  :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will quibble with the last line, because you have not defined what winning means. I think if we could see into the deep recesses of GMTM's brain, past the bathtubs full of poutine and the chubby ref anime, we'd see a plan to get rid of Bylsma once the Sabres reached a certain threshold of contendability.

 

Yes, but it seems the time table of contend-ability (auto corrected) may be the tipping factor for an earlier dismissal.  They seem to be regressing this year. GMTM's deep recesses where not factoring in just how bad this team could/would play for stretches under DDB because he didn't think that it was a reasonable possibility and plan accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

Due in part to the injuries and roster issues this season, but mainly due to the fact that he is a good coach.

+1 You are not alone brother and no I am not your Cain. 

 

Plus I don't think GMTM's firing list will include "he makes Drunkard  :sick: sick  :sick: "

Edited by jsb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread needs a poll. Anyway, I say yes. This time next year? Mayhaps not.

Did the Trump election not make you distrustful of polls???

 

 

 

Dang that WASN'T A POLITICAL STATEMENT...... I swear  :P  :P  :P

Edited by jsb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 You are not alone brother and no I am not your Cain. 

 

Plus I don't think GMTM's firing list will include "he makes Drunkard  :sick: sick  :sick: "

 

I doubt the call even goes to Murray anymore. This organization now has the snake oil salesman's stink on it. Russ Brandon will keep DB just to keep satisfying the Pegula fetish with Pittsburgh (except for the winning part of course).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm interested to hear your defense of him

 

OK.

 

Due to multiple injuries and a roster that is somewhat lacking the type of player he needs, he was not able to play the system he prefers ... dump and chase and grind it out, with enough skill players (which I think he has here now) to finish the scoring chances generated, with a goalie that can more than hold his own as the final line of defence, while the defence have enough mobility and are skilled enough to get the puck up ice and contribute to the scoring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK.

 

Due to multiple injuries and a roster that is somewhat lacking the type of player he needs, he was not able to play the system he prefers ... dump and chase and grind it out, with enough skill players (which I think he has here now) to finish the scoring chances generated, with a goalie that can more than hold his own as the final line of defence, while the defence have enough mobility and are skilled enough to get the puck up ice and contribute to the scoring.

Did you stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK.

 

Due to multiple injuries and a roster that is somewhat lacking the type of player he needs, he was not able to play the system he prefers ... dump and chase and grind it out, with enough skill players (which I think he has here now) to finish the scoring chances generated, with a goalie that can more than hold his own as the final line of defence, while the defence have enough mobility and are skilled enough to get the puck up ice and contribute to the scoring.

My rebuttal would be that there are stretches where he has had a fully healthy roster, and still played the same style or had the same results, losing and losing badly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...