That Aud Smell

I'm not so sure. Recent events have made me especially leery of billionaires lampooning ©hump journalists.

As a consumer of media, I take shots at Harrington and generally avoid him. It concerns me, however, when a prominent public figure would act likewise.

A lot of them are shmucks, as you say. But that's slippery business -- cutting off local reporters who are critical of what you do (while also being shmucks, yes, true for many of them) and eliciting coverage from (national) reporters who will, how you say, work with you a bit more. By my italics I was alluding to another prominent president who is not shy about decrying members of the free press.

Perhaps more likely that she'd just turn to social media platforms to communicate directly with the public. Okay - I'll stop.

Kim Pegula is taking a potshot at reporters whose content does not suit her purposes, you say? Hmm. Does that forecast what sort of president she is apt to be?

I think it's a decidedly open question whether that sort of thing portends good or ill for her preparedness and capacity to serve as president of the teams and the overall conglomerate. If, as people are saying, that's her daughters' account, then her reply is even a bit more ... well, more of whatever it otherwise would be. I'll grant her this: She's apparently going to do things her way. I'm not a fan of that sort of thing, for my own part.

I think he was talking only about the fake dog account, which is presumably not associated with the Pegulas.

Oh hell yeah. IIRC, he shut out the Habs 2x in a 5-game series once, Ha! Interesting factoids. But if you're an anglo from Quebec, doesn't that disqualify you?

Kane was limited by injuries? Including a shoulder injury? Shocking.

Harrington got into a subtweet beef with a fake (?) Pegula dog account? Sounds about right.

Judging by how teams defend in the QMJHL (ils ne), there are few of them generally.

Yep.

These hypotheticals are all well and good. I’m dealing with the matter at hand. (And it’s been a good give and take.)

I mentioned upthread that it was weird that she’s not listed as an owner of the Bills. Days gone by, she was patently a Bills owner and not a Sabres owner. Nah? Anyhoo. You hafta realize that a significant part of why I engage is because I enjoy it as an exercise. Sparring. (Yin to my Yang?)

That’s a good post. I’m on a mobile - can’t reply at length. I’ve touched on plenty of material to substantiate my take that part of what’s at play is a discomfort with a lady taking the reins. And I’ll stand by that. One thing: The old saw about she’s here because “her husband bought the team” is contrary not only to basic concepts of he marital estate (I ain’t litigating it), fuzzier and less legal but nonetheless transcendent concepts surrounding marriage covenants, it’s also a jab at Kim by virtue of her status as Terry’s wife and a woman. I won’t abide it.

Those poor Buffalo News reporters. Will they still get their big ol’ goody bags from Russ at the holidays?

I’m unsure of Kim’s precise experience to date. I’m sure she has material experience in business administration. I’m unsure how she’ll fare as president of the Sabres and Bills. I am sure she co-owns the teams. I’m sure she’s president of the teams — not president of business nor president of hockey (football) ops. I’m confident that JBOT has principal responsibility for hockey ops, and Beane for football ops. I am sure those 2 GMs will work collaboratively with their president, who will have high level input on hockey/football matters, as will owner and CEO Terry. I am sure that success hinges on how well JBOT and Beane can do their jobs. I am optimistic in that regard. I think bias is revealed by saying Kim’s husband bought the teams.

I can’t post it at the moment, but there’s a Tweet out there that compares and contrasts how Bucky addressed alleged sleazy behaviour by Lesean McCoy and Brandon. The McCoy stuff occurred some time ago. McCoy got dragged by Bucky as repugnant; an immature idiot not worth the team’s time. Bucky acted as a scathing scold. Brandon was treated as a tragic figure - “seduced” by his power and position. Bucky refused to serve as the morals police and said private matters are private. Sod off forever, Bucky. Forever.

If there is, as is suggested, some massive interest in knowing precisely what that lady is doing (seriously: WHAT IS SHE DOING?!), then that just proves the point. She’s president of a hockey team like dozens of other businessmen have been before her. Something about *her* appears to be engendering a peculiar level of interest, though, in knowing just what (she thinks) she’ll be doing. /drums figures /arches eyebrows /smirks knowingly

What was Brandon’s title? President, right?

There’s no issue, as I see it. The Sabres have no president of business and no president of hockey. They have a president. As a practical matter, JBOT is like a senior vp of hockey at this point. Kim and Terry are in charge. Same as it ever was — or, at least, same as it’s been since February 2011.

LOL.

We are through the looking glass at this point.

Fair enough. There's a flavour that does seem to emerge more as you scroll through his Tweets and Replies. He doesn't really acknowledge the legitimacy of the points made in reply that there are plenty of successful top execs in the NHL who aren't "hockey people", who are more business people, and who are, as it so happens, men. In any case, and IIRC, Harrington has a decent track record of being good to and about women in sports (I think he used to cover girls HS stuff back when no one else was doing it?). So, I don't think this really goes too far. It's more Harrington being a Twitter d1ck, as per usual (and hence why Friedman was, like, peace-out). The sexist boor is Bucky. Far as I can tell, no one here has assumed or even suggested that.