JoeSchmoe

The grammar of this post says it all.

Friend of mine works for Rich's. Creamer apparently is a very, very small part of their overall business. They're a food services company. They have factories all over North America making anything and everything food related. Their customers are grocery stores, restaurants, gas stations, etc... You buy "fresh" bread at the conglomerate grocery store... there's a good chance it came from Rich's frozen bread dough. You buy pizza from the gas station... Rich's made it. You eat the pulled pork from the chain restaurant... there's a good chance it came from Rich's factory sized smokehouse and packaged up to the restaurant spec. Other than good ma and pa restaurants, nobody makes anything from scratch anymore. It's all stuff from food service customers like Rich's. That's why my friend won't eat out anymore unless it's a better non-chain place.

Didn't like his defensive game either, but had higher hopes for him based on him being more highly touted. Also he started a year younger, played for a far worse team, and was put into much higher leverage situations given there was no one else really besides him. Edit: I would have taken 7 or 7.5mill a season over 8 years when he signed his bridge deal.

From what I've seen of Power so far, I project him being worth about $8 or 9 million a season when he peaks. His draft class was seen as weak overall, and in most years he might have been in the 3 to 6 OA slot. My opinion is it's only his #1 OA pick that has him projected in the $11M ballpark. If starts using his size defensively, and greatly improves his shot, I can be proven wrong. Given he still played smaller than what he is in college, I'm thinking he doesn't have the big dog mentality in him.

Two comments... 1 Even though I'm happy he's signed, this one may set a precedent amongst the players and the days of us getting team friendly deals like the last 3 big ones might be over. 2 I'm not signing any long term contracts with Power until he shows he can play better defense. Picking up the defensive side of the game can take a few years for a young D, but I wouldn't want to take the risk given what I've seen of him so far. He needs to work on his shot too.

Tonight VO earned the spot he already had. Keep him. Benson makes the team. Greenway would be easily replaceable. Don't like his game at all. Love the spark from Krebs, but I don't see him staying ahead of similar talent in the pipeline. I don't think he's around when this team wins the cup.

I don't think that line would fly in this day and age of the analytics era. Back then you could kind of say what you wanted, and if it sounded good, it would stick. No one questioned it. Fuhr was in the right place at the right time on being on maybe the best offensive team ever. Unfortunately, we lost Andreychuk due to the old hockey trope that Fuhr knew how to win.

The Sabres lost every game by a goal against Mtl. 3 in OT. They were the eventual cup winner. When I first heard about the trade I was irate. Not because I knew Hasek was going to the the eventual GOAT. I was mad we lost our #2 goal scorer. Andreychuk had 54 goals that year. All this to pick up a goalie that was statistically worse than Hasek. The line at the time was Fuhr "knew how to win". Who the F$&! couldn't win on those Oilers teams?!?! Sabres win the cup if that trade doesn't happen.

Easily the worst trade in Sabres history, when you consider the Sabres probably win the cup with Andreychuk and Hasek.

Just some additional context... xg stats always seem to devalue big shooters like VO. I think his value is greater than his advanced stats. On the flip side, the eye test shows he generally isn't very good at making plays or playing defense. I will say though, there's been times he's looked VERY good as far as playmaking and forechecking goes. He just doesn't seem to have the natural drive to do it on a consistent basis.

Had the floppy drive, had the 13" B&W monitor, but never the printer. I would have really envied you back when I was 11 or 12 years old! My friend had a Texas Instruments computer back then too. Together we got kind of good at programming in BASIC on our respective machines... At least as good as kids our age could have got. Edit: Sorry about the thread hijack!

My first computer, an Atari 800XL had 64kB. No rads, no pumps.

Right now the mindset is you can still get a better deal on the secondary market... and there's no benefit in purchasing way ahead. Until enough people get stung by not getting their tickets upfront you'll see the box office tickets sitting there. That will happen at least a month or so after this team is a legit playoff team AND the Bills/Sabres fans go into full hockey mode after the Superbowl.

https://youtu.be/p44G0U4sLCE?si=6S-M9gEU6muYwfa_

What have you seen of him that I haven't? For a guy as light on talent as he is, you'd think he'd be giving it all to stay in the league by using his size. If he won't do that, give his spot to someone that actually cares.

If we're being completely honest with ourselves, we'll have at least 3 or 4 F's not playing opening night that are far better hockey players than Greenway. Nearly every rush his line took ended on his stick.

Step aside UPL, it's Comrie's spot on the door this season.

I've watched more baseball than this Leafs Amerks game, but from what little I've seen, Johnson hasn't looked anywhere near NHL ready.

Literally?

17 years?!?? Have you thought about changing your handle to PTSD?

Doesn't seem like the type of guy Adams is after.

My first ever GDT.

Always happy to be wrong if it means the Sabres are better for it. I'm just questioning if he's the answer for us to score more goals than get scored against, which in hockey, trumps "physicality" 10 times out of 10. If physicality leads to more goals, then sign me up... but in BOS, that was not the case for him.

Based on what I'm reading here, most people think he was brought in to be a number 4D. I would want my number 4D to be responsible for creating more scoring chances than they give up. Maybe you think it's a BS stat, but it's not like he has a long track record of being an effective defenseman in years before last year either.

It's a percentage of expected goals for vs goals against, meaning he gave up more scoring chances than he created. He was one of the worst on the team, and one of the only ones below 50%.