I think a reasonable argument can be made to go D over wing when talent is relatively equal, as it's the more important position. I was a Nylander booster anyway, but I don't think it's inherently a poor argument. On the other hand, anything resembling "Sergachev was a slam dunk pick" is clearly hindsight.
Yea, Sergachev had plenty of questions and McAvoy would have been a "reach." It happens. This draft looks similar in that any of like 5 guys could end up being second best after Dahlin.
There is no prompt on mobile dammit! :cry: