Weave

Not bitter. Just an extension of my Because Buffalo disappointment.

Yup.

And probably cloud cover.

Ok, this is awesome. A story from the old days that I had not heard previously. Very cool.

Owen Power’s ceiling?

The only experience here was a rapid darkness and then the rapid lightening. The cloud cover was heavy, very threatening rain looking. Had a less than 30 sec look in a gap in the clouds when the sun was about 30% obscured. Thats it. Disappointing. Would have liked to see a show. Oh well. Next time. Nevermind.

The gloom in the sky matches the gloom in Sabreland.

Byram is not the guy you move for Parayko. Byram is a win now and win later player. Think prospects.

Just once before I die. Kinda like championship expectations around here.

T minus - 1hr and my locale is solidly blocked in with cloud cover. Not optimistic that I will see much of a show.

We are expected to move on from ~3 forwards. If the 3 prospects I mentioned take their place, there is not room on the roster unless KA starts trading folks. I don’t foresee that happening, but am willing to get excited if it does. And if the trades are veterans out, we still aren’t improving the number of veterans on the team overall.

Veteran leadership specifically. This is what you can expect when the team building focus is “don’t block the kids”. If our roster changes for next season include Kulich, Rosen, Savoie, replacing our FA’s this will happen again next season.

Progress!

Same story as last season, they start to get things interesting, a little pressure is on, and they can’t get it done.

Wooooo! Tue future is bright!

It’s drunken boomer posting in the wrong thread day.

Wait….. Luke Gadzik is on a broadcast team? I thought all he could do is grunt and snort.

Wrong thread.

This seems to be about as close as they can get. Every time they get within a couple of games they screw it up.

i was pretty agnostic about Kane to Buffalo, but if the Sabres did make an attempt to sign him and he chose Detroit because he liked the chances there better, I hope Detroit goes down in flames. Not that he was necessarily wrong, though. LOL

Some of them are serving in Congress currently and have commented on it already.

Thry create “weather” forecasts, not “sky viewing “ forecasts. You are being unrealistic.

Don’t cha’know? It takes a perennial rebuild to create a perennial contender.

Lol you complain that the models can’t predict rain and you want them to predict density of cloud cover in a small area, during a small window of time? I concede.

Wait….. wasn’t it just a couple of days ago the NWS was in the pockets of the Buffalo Chamber of Commerce? I suspect most of this is you playing the grumpy old man character. You are asking meteorologists to predict when an area maybe 60 miles wide is going to have mid or low atmospheric elevations see water vapor condense into microdroplets around a -1hr time window, something their models are poorly tuned to predict given their emphasis on actually impactful predictive modeling. Yes, if you want to know if it going to be party sunny within your viewing horizon around a specific, short period of time, your porch window is always going to be your most accurate tool.