Weave

Timothy Dalton and it's not even close. He just didn't have any of the traits the character was supposed to have. It's like Tom Cruise playing Jack Reacher. Oh.. wait.

I don't hate that goathead. Don't love it either. At least it's not black and red.

Pretty sure it is a time-distance thing, not just distance.

I do think kids today have a much healthier idea of work life balance than we do.

Pimlach, your experience with leading millennials in engineering fields mirrors mine. Then again, I’ve only found distraction to be an issue when someone is not being challenged sufficiently, and there is no age block more affected by that than any other.

You guys are doing social media all wrong. All that garbage can be weeded out of your feed.

I'm pro BJ's, but probably wouldn't make a good Presidential candidate.

Noone called you a racist. They said you were enabling a racist. It's the simple definition of the word "enabling". By voting for someone who encourages bigotry you are assisting to put them into a position that allows them to continue encouraging bigotry. You are likely not a bigot and racist, and probably voted for Trump for some other reason, but the act of voting for him is helping to put him in a position where he can continue his bigoted behavior. That is classic enabling. Did the end justify the means? If so, then own it. For example, Bill Clinton. Those that voted for him the second time around prioritized something over his White House sexual escapades. If you voted for 2nd term Clinton, you were by definition enabling his behavior. Those voters weren't cheating dirtbags necessarily, but they sure enabled one. Again, if the end justified the means, own it. You voted for a dirtbag because you prioritized something higher than the character of the candidate. Doesn't mean you have the same character. It does mean you found that character acceptable enough to choose something else as your deciding issue. Editing to add- Enabling is the right word for supporting a candidates good things too. You vote for a candidate because you like his tax plan and by voting for him you are enabling him to act on it. Or maybe the tax plan is your trigger item but he also want to start Space Force. By voting for him for his tax plan you are enabling him to go down the Space Force path too. Enabling cuts both ways. giggle, giggle. Space Force Bwahahahahahahaha!

It's tiktok. I ain't clickin.

I think they are trying to infect the President Elect. Oh wait. I just saw the date of that tweet. Nevermind.

Relative to the Bruins, we were playing catch up alot of the time. In my fanhood the only times I think we were too much for Boston was the May, Ray, Barnaby years. And the short time John Scott was here. But we were game most of the rest of the time. Possibly outmatched, but game.

You must really have an issue with elements of the south that to this day refuse to accept, adapt or tolerate the USA that they rose against. I mean, at least the immigrants coming in want to be a part of this nation and not impose their ideas on it.....

We're debating getting together. Count case in my county is higher than it was in Spring. And the county I work in is blowing up. I really don't want to be the one who spreads it to my family. Inflammatory language helps immensely.

I'd buy your outrage over court packing if you showed any outrage over what was done with Garland in 2016, followed by the the 180 turn this September with Barrett. That's court packing too, regardless of the total number of judges. The intent was 100% the same. You don't get to do it and then claim the other side cannot. If you think what the Democrats stand for now is communism, or even socialism then you don't know what it is and how absolutely terrible it was either. Hint, noone is proposing state ownership of the means of production. And as already touched upon above, none of the previous immigration groups abandoned their cultures when they came here, why should the non-Europeans have to do it? Or is that the real issue, you don't want just the brown skinned cultures to grow here?

Call it a trend then. Point still stands.

Wookie, how was what happened over the last 4 years not packing the court?

You sure aren’t getting any new ideas or culture change by continuously hiring from within.

You're the disappointed dog at the gate that isn't in here. 😁

I'm the one in the back, eating and pretending to not pay attention.

What does a Director of Hockey Strategy even do?

Boomers are still the most populous generation and still have the ability to control elections just by their sheer numbers. It's frustrating because the only real option is to wait them out.

LOL Over 0.5 assists on average. SOMEONE WIN THE INTERNETZ!

One more point to make my point. How many consecutive elections have we heard some variation of “if elected President he’d be the oldest president ever to start a term”? Their moment had passed. Its time to let the next group have its moment.

Well, that’s part of the problem. Unlike previous generations, This generation has refused to let the next generation lead. By the time age has taken its course gen X will be at a point where they need to step aside as well. I think a key difference is gen X is willing to see what the next generation can do and won’t box them out. And unlike the boomers we probably don’t have the numbers to do it if we wanted to. And there is this as well.