K-9

You're one of the ever decreasing GOP goose stepping crowd that actually takes pride in how that party acted during that witch hunt. Even Ken Starr regrets that time. Only the staunchest GOP lackeys aren't embarrassed by the $74m required to get a man to lie about a BJ. BJs and stains on a dress. Good times, GOP, good times. Again, well done.

More tripe.

Well done, GOP. Free thinker, my ass.

That's a load of garbage. 75 million dollar investigation by Ken Starr and the best the GOP could do was to have Linda Tripp covertly record Lewinsky saying what they needed to hear and then entrapping a president to lie about an extra-marital affair. You and the GOP have no right to dictate to anyone what is sanctified in another person's marriage and what isn't. It's a private family matter. But I get why you and the GOP would want the Clintons to rehash the salacious details. It makes for good GOP television.

That 1998 political theater production was a private family affair that was nobody's business until the republican Congress spent millions of dollars beating the bushes, wiring Linda Tripp who got Lewinsky to say what they needed to hear, and then used that covert recording to entrap a president into lying about receiving . Well done, GOP.

Sad thing is, I'd vote for a Kardashian before I would vote for Trump.

Good luck with that, then. But that won't qualify you any more than it does Trump to lead the most powerful nation on earth.

Trump's "skill set" is celebrity. Period.

Tongue in cheek? OK, if that helps to justify yet another irresponsible gaffe by your candidate. But he's gonna get raked over the coals. Of course, you will blame the "liberal media" as that's what the right always does in these cases. You may want to stay glued to FOX in order to avoid the fallout. That was an irresponsible, phucked up thing for any politician to say, let alone a candidate for our highest office. And another indication he lacks the temperament for the job. He just can't help himself. And this is what he is when he comes out of that shell:

Seeing his name plastered on buildings might suggest those buildings are his, but they aren't. I'm amazed at the number of branded properties he doesn't have a stake in. His name has a certain cache, but it doesn't always generate revenues for his businesses.

There is no shortage of examples of people born rich who possess amazing talents and abilities that enable them to prosper further. It's Trump's lack of a discernible skill set that suggests to me he hasn't done much in the way of accomplishments. It's also his history of screwing people over that cloud those accomplishments as well. It's all well and good that he's a global brand, but it don't mean much.

They lost me in the 80s when they were co-opted by the Moral Majority and Evangelicals. I voted for Bush 41 and a couple others in various local and state elections, but it's been a while and I can't see anyone on the horizon that will influence me to do that again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html?_r=0

What skill set that made it work? It's hard to find skill sets in people born on third base that act like they've hit a home run. Let me know when you discover Trump's skill set for the office as I'd be very interested in knowing what that is.

We have a bit more than that. We have three woman and one man pressing charges for non-criminal assault at that bar. And yes, it's most important to remember the allegations haven't been proven one way or the other. But it's more than just one woman accusing here.

He's had numerous failures, too. Failures that led to a few bankruptcies. Not to mention there are literally THOUSANDS of vendors who've had to resort to lawsuits in order to get paid for services his companies simply decided not to pay them for. There's a reason he is the most litigious candidate in history. Honestly, I cannot detect ONE discernible presidential feature in the man. Not one.

Did I really hear Trump encourage Russia to commit a federal crime and hack into the DNC and Clinton servers? Really?

Listening to Trump's presser in Florida. To say he lacks intellectual agility is an understatement. My favorite quote so far: "They never should have released David Hinckley."

Yes, because they enjoyed so many freedoms under centuries of czarist imperial rule.

Yes. The law is pretty clear on this. Why do I get the impression Trump knows little about these laws and cares even less?

Bernie won't give up his independent status, but he will always caucus with the dems.

I meant that sexual assault charges have nothing to do with anything here, only the non criminal harassment and trespassing charges E Kane faces. Perhaps I caused confusion when I used Patrick Kane as an example of a white player and alluded to his troubles. My apologies if that's the case. I only used P Kane as an example to say that if it was him that night at Bottoms Up, he too, would have been arrested and treated the same if all four complainants pressed charges, regardless that he's white. Hope that clears it up.

Not only am I not saying it, I never even implied it. He is charged with non criminal harassment as a result of all four complainants pressing those charges. My whole argument with you is those charges and his subsequent arrest on those charges have nothing to do with him being black.

Outstanding! LMAO. All future posts in this thread are ruined.