All Activity

I disagree, he has very good lateral movement, skating and speed for his size. He will develop further. The reason he went 71 and not 21 is his lack of offense. He'll struggle with that, but not a huge concern if he ends up being a 3rd pair dman

Ok I’m in love

But yea... gt was awful. Upl was basically the worst starter in the league.

if you want to get excited for the future - watch these 2 interviews - David blows the doors off:

I mean I’m all for it except he might allow a goal every time he’s on the ice. His talent is his violence. I don’t think the rest of his game is anywhere near where it needs to be. Otherwise, he’s a first round pick.

Marginally better but don’t see the playoffs as it stands.

Agreed. Was it defense or goaltending? Not a loaded question. I know the analytics are out there but I’ve seen numbers indicating a goalie upgrade is necessary.

stopped in to say thanks for the analysis, @Eleven - and lol, Soviets.

good idea but then he better have a 1B d lined up to play with Dahlin

Scrabble tiles. Outstanding!

Also, palm trees.

Yep. There's a man in charge now. Two, if we count Jarmo.

Fixed that for you.

Seems Adams wants a bigger team, he's added size, I guess thats good.

I don’t know if the Sabres will trade Byram before camp begins. If he isn’t dealt then the unit is better with the additions of Kesserling and Timmons. Will Samuelson have a bounce back year? I’m more hopeful than most here. In tabulating the results so far it comes down to what is the impact of the JJP subtraction? And another critical issue is: will the owner allow the salary savings to be utilized on other moves? As it stands, I’m more troubled than not. I’m still hoping for more moves. There needs to be less plodding along and a greater demonstration of urgency.

The Soviet Union has not been around since 1991 lol.

Can't give a grade yet until we see if he can lure a top 6 forward in free agency. With an improved defense and overall tougher team, we should see some actual steps forward next year. Unfortunately, we are nowhere near a playoff team. If we can get to 90 points that would be progress and probably the ceiling for this roster. This is a long-term project to fix. On the flip side, we could be flirting with total disaster if no progress is made.

Y'all know we were 10th in the entire NHL in goals all while Kulich we a rookie and Cozens only managed 11 cuz he's awful? We need to reduce goals against more than anything.

Well he only has a year left on his deal so they could negotiate the 8 year before the trade I guess Yea, Mitch you wanna come play on kulichs wing or jack eichels?

Short answer, they are about the same, I think if there are no major injuries, slightly better....but that is only if there are no major injuries...and slightly is not good enough to make a major jump in the standings. 1.) Cozens/Norris. If Norris is healthy, this make the team better. The advanced stats, the simple stats, watching the games....all of those things pointed to Cozens hurting the team more than (or at least as much as) he helped. 2.) I liked Jokiharju, I think he was better than most people thought, but at BEST he was a serviceable mid-pair guy. Losing him not a huge factor. 3.) No clue. I think Peterka caused almost as many problems as he solved with his goals, but the key word there is 'almost'. While I think Cozens was a net negative player, Peterka was still an overall positive. He will be a loss, but hopefully the return will negate that loss. 4.) Clifton for Timmins? Not a big deal either way. 5.) Quinn. If he played like he did the last 1.5 years, I don't want him on the team. I guess the hope is he turns his bad play around (his own end and unwillingness to go to the net). More needs to be done. It'll be easier to have an answer to this question when we know if Byrum re-signs or what the return for him is...and we know more about the quality of goaltending they will get. This team had problem last year, but in my opinion the problems were in this order. 1.) How bad the goaltending was 2.) How bad Cozens and Quinn were without the puck 3.) D-partners/pairings that didn't look in sync with each other. #1 is still a wide open question. #2 has partially been solved, but not totall. #3, well, they are making an attempt, but we have no idea until October (or later) how successful their attempt is.

That was funny. My response should not take away from that! For me, 44 years of seeing the first name bryan probably...idk. lol If promise not to do it again...but that would be disingenuous

Maybe. Perhaps the post was performative. You've got to admit "while Scrabble tiles marinates in juniors" is pretty damn good. (And what is it about Byram that his name just begs to be misspelled?)

Not a terrible deal for a bottom end of the roster. 2nd rounders in the NHL are generally Meh anyways and Clifton was a warm body on a terrible team. Problem is, this does nothing to help move this team from 79 pts to the playoffs. Never any apparent urgency to make the top of the roster any better is the annual issue. And would any of us trust KA to make that happen?

The Blues are strapped for cap space and four of their top 6 D are 32 or older. Byram for Kyrou (6 more years @ $8.125MM, I know, not a C) makes a lot of sense. Throw in Rosen or Rousek if you have to, a '26 pick, but not Helenius.

They didn't trade a 2nd round pick for an ECHL defenceman. It's Clifton and a 2nd round pick for Timmons and the ECHL defenceman.